Sentences with phrase «different than the gospel»

Second, I view «justification» not as something different than the gospel, but a subset, or a subcategory of the gospel.

Some have said that Paul's gospel was different than the gospel that John the Baptist preached, which was different again from the gospel that Jesus proclaimed.

Not exact matches

1st Timothy 3.7 Now, being disgraced for the Gospel's sake is totally different than falling out of favor amongst those to whom you are to be salt...

They move to San Francisco, become gay, and zealously preach the gospel of atheism whether people want to hear them or not... all the while thinking how much different and better than daddy they are.

I might believe in a different Gospel than Jeffres, but that is a different issue:)

He is using 2 different Greek works (heteros --RRB- and (allos) to show that the believers at Galatia are being led astray by those who are presenting a gospel of a «COMPLETELY different kind» — heteros, than what they had received.

This «threat» seems to increase when a leader perceives the gospel different than before: an elder or pastor will face some pretty petty attacks.

Matthew and Luke — written later than Mark's Gospel and Paul's letters — tell us that Jesus fulfilled these prophecies (but as we said, have different explanations of how he fulfilled two of the three).

The Gospel of John, written a good deal later than these, is different in structure, style, and quite largely in content.

There are different ways of living for Jesus than taking time on the company payroll to read the Bible and pray, and then annoy all the coworkers by singing Gospel songs and quoting Scripture verses at them all day.

Rather than getting bogged down in the minutiae of this or that passage, he shows that the achievement of the gospels is to help us understand why discipleship makes sense, why the Jesus whose life they capture in different ways is worthy of following.

Since the bible is a collection of individual books and letters, etc., written over the span of many years, by many different authors, some of which who wrote anonymously (including the authors of all four gospels), then we might say that it has no purpose other than what people use it for.

The Gospel of Thomas tells the story of the lost sheep in a different way than the canonical gospels do.

Well, the Sermon on the Mount is probably recorded in more than one gospel (at least a similar sermon, although perhaps preached in a different location).

However impressive the alleged sign or wonder might be, we are not to pay heed to any messenger who leads us toward a different god than the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, or to accept another gospel than the one the Church received from the apostles in the first century.

John is the only Gospel to portray Jesus as different in nature from the prophets, as more than the culminating high point of the succession of people called by God and commissioned with special tasks.

The Christ of the gospels teaches a very different religion than that of the Hebrews and includes many eastern philosophies.

«Barnabas probably found the form of worship and presentation of the gospel among Gentiles to be different than among Jews.

The gospel is so radically different than what we know or could imagine, that we never could have cooked it up.

The «Gospel» is different than «eternal life» and both are different again from «salvation.»

The word «gospel» originally meant «good news,» and that's news about something that has happened as a result of which everything is different, including who we are, but it's much bigger than that.

How is the «prosperity gospel» any different than any «feel good» entertainment like adult industry?

A gospel presentation to a group of 5th graders will be different than one before a group of PhD's which will be different than one to those with no thestic background.

In fact, it does not overstate the case to say that the Roman Catholic view on justification sets it apart as a wholly different religion than the true Christian faith, for it is ant.ithetical to the simple gospel of grace.

First, since human society always employs violence to enforce some set of standards, Christians» whom Christ called to live out a radically different form of community, one in which it is the crucified rather than his judges who is vindicated as God's Word» should simply take up the burden of civic order and abandon the Gospel where prudentially necessary because, you know, someone absolutely has to kill heretics, and so we should make sure the right heretics get killed.

NP is not saying anything different than Paul would have heard in his lifetime â $ «and NP is not backing away from the gospel either (or his message to his congregation).

Forgot to add: DDT has a 1/2 life of a year or so, orders of magnitude different than the consensus modeling predicted and everyone accepted as gospel.