An analysis of current religious programming on American television reveals the influence of this shaping effect on religious programming also: particular religious traditions are presented to the exclusion of others; there are apparent similarities between the content of many religious programs and general television programming; and there are similarities in religious program formats and content even in programs from a range of
different theological traditions and experience.
Bringing as they did, quite
different theological traditions and resources, were there some things they could affirm together?
It represented the union of Churches out of
a different theological tradition as well as a different tradition of polity.
Not exact matches
Mainline Protestants (Methodists, Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and the like) and evangelical / fundamentalist Protestants (an umbrella group of conservative churches including the Pentecostal, Baptist, Anabaptist, and Reformed
traditions) not only belong to distinctly
different kinds of churches, but they generally hold distinctly
different views on such matters as
theological orthodoxy and the inerrancy of the Bible, upon which conservative Christians are predictably conservative.
But any genuine recovery of a «particular language of faith» will entail developing and appropriating a
theological tradition and embodying that
tradition in faithful living — a project that necessarily requires motivations and insights deriving from a quite
different kind of authority than the sociologists possess.
The ecumenical and neo-orthodox movements, as well as joint participation in graduate
theological education, have not brought the
different traditions together.
But in the case of the fourth gospel we are dealing with a single entity exhibiting a marked degree of unity in
theological emphasis such that no attempt to divide the gospel into
different sources and to begin to write a history of the Johannine
tradition has commanded anything like a common consent among scholars.
The choice of terms is Whitehead's and it may be somewhat confusing for the novice theologian, for we are dealing with a
different kind of distinction from what is found in our
theological traditions.
There is a long
tradition based on various kinds of idealism that affected
theological thinking in previous years and found its modern exponents in such men as William Temple and Paul Tillich, although these two men emphasized
different aspects of this
tradition.
Informationally speaking, the pluralist
theological option radically relativizes the importance of distinct religious boundaries, proposing that
different religious
traditions may all be equally valid ways of experiencing the revelation of an ultimate reality transcending the comprehension of any particular
tradition (See the essays in John Hick and Paul Knitter, eds., The Myth of Christian Uniqueness (Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 1987).
The evangelical movement's strength has always been its centripetal force — the power of its central
theological and missional premises to unite those from drastically
different Christian
traditions.
When
theological schemes are interpreted against the background of this wider reality, we can come to see that the concerns which have shaped specific
theological positions are ones that other
traditions often share, even if with a
different emphasis and linked with other concerns.
Later, the group also considered more fundamental
theological matters, such as the doctrine of salvation and the ecclesiological questions implied in
different understandings of the relation between Scripture and
Tradition and of «the communion of saints.»
To the extent that Whitehead did develop a notion of God, it was a God
different in important respects from the deity of the Western
theological tradition.
A
theological tradition which «believes in Jesus» encourages the believer to construct the faith - image of this Jesus, an image made up as a result of many
different influences: the preaching and teaching of the Church, the reading of the gospels and of devotional literature, the lives and ideals of influential individuals, and so on.