Sentences with phrase «different view of things»

I take a slightly different view of things.

The current Republican president and his Secretary of the Interior have a different view of things.

Seeing the Free State from the water's edge is a completely different view of things, and sleeping under the stars makes for an awesome adventure combination.

«Do you have any idea of what the answer might be to come to some sense of what the truth is so there can be some kind of reconciliation between two people who clearly have a different view of things?»

Speaking about my view of Ukrainian and Russian online dating, I have completely different view of things and opinion.

«It's nice to see Chagnon reanalyzing some of his data 30 or 40 years later and coming up with a slightly different view of things.»

When accusations happen that, in your case, you say that «this is not an accurate thing for me,» do you have any idea what the answer might be to come to some sense of what the truth is so that there can be some sort of reconciliation between people who clearly have different views of things?»

«Do you have any idea of what the answer might be to come to some sense of what the truth is so there can be some sort of reconciliation between people who clearly have different views of things?»

Not exact matches

Advisers who work with Brandes are equipped with a so - called «IDEAS» script, with each letter identifying a different step in the process: Inquire about how the other person is doing; Describe things you hear; Empathize with the client; Add your own point of view; Suggest a solution.

In view of all the things that can be said about a company and the effects that can take place on a share price for many different reasons, there is and will never be any excuse to shy away from the hard work of studying a company in order to find its real intrinsic value.

If there's one thing I've learned from this blog, it's that people of the same religion have wildly different views.

Genesis when they talk about separating light and dark... only works in laundry, otherwise, due to physics, you can not separate light and dark, they are terms denoting different amounts of the same thing, the moon is not a luminary, it is a reflector, and does not rule the night, (the moon is just as likely to be in your view during the day as the night)

You spend so much time talking about things like grace, yet you don't seem to have enough of it to allow those who have a different view and / or style of interaction from yours to express themselves without your lecture of improper behavior.

The most startling thing I noticed as I grew more acquainted with the Gospels was that Jesus had a very different view of faith than the one to which I was accustomed.

The large number of posts at the beginning all gathered together with David's post, provided some really intersting reading, and seeing how the different perspectives were viewing things.

Whitehead's view, in contrast, does justice to the strict demands of the concept of identity: two things are only identical when they are exactly the same.7 A person at two different moments of time is not the identical person; he or she should therefore be understood as composed of many different occasions, and as «one person» only by extrapolation.

Someone who thinks that God expects us to be our brother's keeper would have a different view on things than someone who thinks there is nothing past this life and that there is no erason to help another person outside of sentiment.

Against this view, Iris Murdoch and others have used the insights of psychology and literature to focus on the common experience in which two people looking at an event see totally different things going on.

It is one thing to disagree with their stance, quite another to try to vilify them and demonize them systematically so as to hurt their business and reputation, simply to punish them for donating food -LRB-!!!!), simply because the recipients of that food share different political views.

One of the great things about this country is that we can all have different views.

But although they are talking about the same thing, they are doing it from different points of view.

Before we set out Whitehead's view, it should be noted that if his view really is a different way of looking at real things, then we will need to think about freedom, human action, responsibility, the meaning of life, the self, etc. in a new way.

Despite the often considerable differences in their interests, views, and philosophic temperaments, and despite the rather different course of careers and subsequent influence on the profession of philosophy generally, there remains the common commitment of both to plumbing the depths of the nature of things, while eschewing nonsense, pretense, fad, and fraud in favor of (as Russell himself might have put the matter) that modest but frequently neglected goal of truth.

What is under challenge is the view of some people as to what constitutes real Faith and real science - a rather different thing.

I often hear tales of clergy believing one thing, but preaching something entirely different because their congregation have very firmly held views on what they're willing to hear... and that's often what they were taught in Sunday school as children — they're 80 now.

Phase 2 is the time that you learn tons of tedious information and things that once looked the same are now viewed as vastly different, with each nuance becoming at times a whole new category of learning.

That is a sad sad statement seems like you are judging and want everyone to think like you, fact is we are all different I would hate to think that Heaven is filled with robots who have to do this or do that in order to be right with God we did not ask to be created, we are just living our lives based on our view and interpretation of things, we can not possibly think like Jesus because we are not perfect, fact is I do nt want to worship a God that would» ALLOW» a place like HELL to exist, also tell me where the bible mentions hell, just once.

Neither these teachings nor these narratives may be imposed as articles of faith on those who seek the ultimate truth of which these things are but the temporary vehicles, and who are themselves conditioned by a totally different world view.

Yeah, the important thing is not to view your particular ethnicity, culture, and religion as superior or not being able to share a plot of land with those that are different.

You choose to do what you did and in that action held the seed of change... might i add that if one was to change all it takes is (normally) a different outlook on life — and so with that you could have tried anything as long as you thought full heartly that it would have an impact on your life and the way you view things (whether good or bad, poistive or negitive).

Whitehead's statements about the singularity of the primordial nature, the advocate of the societal view may observe in response, can mean two different things.

One's view of his own past is the same in principle as his view of the past of another person or thing, but so tremendously different quantitatively in intensity as to amount practically to a qualitative difference.

--- Yes, I do have very different points of view than NP, but he will be the first one to tell you that when he says the things in this blog, he isn't looking for the choir to endorse every one of his views.

I believe he has a very different point of view on things from NP, but I think he is just trying to understand where np is coming from.

«Over a number of decades we were political opponents and held very different views on many, many issues but the one thing we were absolutely united on was the principle that our people were better able to govern themselves than any British government.

Or do we try to keep our divergent views to ourselves, and though meaning vastly different things when we say that Christ is risen, give the outward appearance of a unified intention?

Different views of what Jesus would do when Jesus was the Son of God and things were different bDifferent views of what Jesus would do when Jesus was the Son of God and things were different bdifferent back then.

A belief is something you have come to based on an active search where you you gather evidence and then make a hypothesis changing your view from one of neutral to positive «I believe in gravity after having studied the research that has been done and my personal experience with things falling on my head» which is different than «I disbelieve Leprechauns because there is no evidence one way or the other as to their existence.»

As different as these two views seem to be, they have one thing in common: They both focus solely on what they want to see, disregarding the complexity and intensity of motherhood, and the way in which it transforms a woman and her crystal heart.

Using different curriculum gives your child a fresh view of the material instead of doing the same thing twice.

If an older child has received a degree of special treatment such as foster care or a especially assigned and paid for caretaker within the institutional setting, this may certainly facilitate a smoother transition to an American home but it is so very important that newly adoptive families understand that they are a very different experience to the older post-institutionalized child who may view them as objects of indiscriminant attachment or people who can be easily manipulated into giving all the things which they never had: food, clothing, toys, games, socialization and unconditional love in the absence of structure or consistency.

It kind of boggles my mind that there are people that think making kids give up their toys is unethical (although I do think throwing toys out behind the kid's back IS wrong)... but everyone has different views on things and they are entitled to that.

It is based in relationships and grows with emotional awareness and the capacity to see things from different points of view.

We all had our different reasons, we all had our points of view, but one thing is for sure, not a single one of us ever set out to make other people feel bad, nor put anyone down, nor judge anybody else's choices.

But of course being an IBCLC, breastfeeding mum of three boys AND passionate about all things breastfeeding, I have a different view on the whole cow's milk / human milk la - de-da-de-da arguments and discussion that go on...

Things we use in our home for «grown - up» play, in the kitchen and some other parts of home, can be easily transferred to toys with a little creativity and a different view.

Two people could be against the same thing but for different reasons / rational and these attempt to explain that rational and as such can be viewed as the root of this disposition.

I think it is good that Douglas Alexander accepted our invitation to come and debate this: we do take the view that getting ministers to engage in open public debates with a range of different critical voices is a good thing.

«There will, of course, be many different points of view about the future direction we should take as a party but we believe the critical thing is to develop an open process for ideas and views to be aired.»

The modern day Republican party is an amalgam of several groups - at least, today - with pretty different views on many things.