Sentences with phrase «different views on something»

I spoke to Fairchild about why so many people have different views on something as simple as the color of a tennis ball.

While this could certainly benefit Musk, there's no denying that he and Trump have very different views on something that Musk considers existentially urgent: global climate change.

Not exact matches

i think if every religion had a massive get together day or something along those lines it would be good... there is not so many different views on islam, however there is something like 30,000 different branches of christianity... this could unite the collective and make for a meaningful belief.

Haven't you ever read something or viewed something and had one opinion on what it said to you, yet someone else has a different opinion?

I often hear tales of clergy believing one thing, but preaching something entirely different because their congregation have very firmly held views on what they're willing to hear... and that's often what they were taught in Sunday school as children — they're 80 now.

The fact that I might believe something different concerning some specific question in the future does not affect my views on the basis of knowledge the slightest bit.

A belief is something you have come to based on an active search where you you gather evidence and then make a hypothesis changing your view from one of neutral to positive «I believe in gravity after having studied the research that has been done and my personal experience with things falling on my head» which is different than «I disbelieve Leprechauns because there is no evidence one way or the other as to their existence.»

It is about finding a psychological identity that is separate from parents — that they have a role in the family or at school, they know what that treasured and valued role is, and that they do feel accepted and loved but also a bit «separate», a bit ready to take a view on something... there is a shift toward the child having real opinions about the world, that may be different than the parent's view, and that in this view that the child has a continuous self and therefore can participate in learning.

So, I mean none of that makes it impossible that he was also sort of invested in this debate about world views, I just, I think it's more like what you said a moment ago, I think if he heard something, it doesn't have to have been about astronomy or cosmology, if he was exposed to something really different or intriguing or fascinating he would incorporate little bits of it into what he was working on.

And whilst it may not expand on the story, its usually quite nice seeing it from another point of view, and that its more gun orientated - its refreshing when developers use DLC to try something (even slightly) different from the main game rather than just an extension.

Situated on the edge of the Noosa River and capturing 180 degree water views, The Boathouse is an iconic venue comprising of three levels each offering something different.

In the world of PC's Alienware is a pretty big name that is viewed in two very different lights; on the one - hand those with the willingness to build their own computers see little of value in the company due to the high costs, while folk looking to simply purchase something that has a little more va - va - voom than the average off - the - shelf machine can find a lot to look provided they are willing to pay the price.

They can view mission objectives, examine the map from all sides, learn about the different guards on duty and their patrol routes and even replay the briefing just in case they forgot something.

I think that censorship is appropriate in the cases when something may be more acceptable in Japanese culture, but will offend people in other countries (for example, Japan has different views on non-hetrosexuality, which are present in some games).

«And Now For Something Completely Different» opens tonight and remains on view through June 12 at Ille Arts, 216a Main Street Amagansett, NY.

«The Time is Now» at John Berggruen Gallery takes a wide view on the theme with an exhibit of work crossing mediums and eras, some loosely relevant by use of the standard time indicators (clocks and watches), while others, doing as art is supposed to, reframe the paradigm you walked in with and show you something different.

The smiling Chinese figure in Piggyback (Chinese Down) belongs to a repertoire of characters that Muñoz created including the dwarf, ballerina and ventriloquist dummy, all of whom appear to us as both familiar and strange: «There is something about their appearance that makes them different, and this difference in effect excludes the spectator from the room they are occupying... The spectator becomes very much like the object to be looked at, and perhaps the viewer has become the one who is on view».

The manifold intricacies and refinements discovered on walking through the two galleries of this current exhibition not only implore a sustained and lengthy viewing, they also imply that further configurations in the future — on an another wall, at a different location, with another combination of works — will yield yet more insight into a restless determination Ryman has described as a desire to «make something happen.»

What is going on here it seems to me is that Minister has a different view of the electoral gain by saying something different to the Prime Minister.

At the very least, the blood on a «real» butcher's apron reminds us of this; the Smart Butcher's plastic, sterile (hopefully) viewing windows suggests something altogether different.

And, I suppose there's some reason to consider there's some basis for believing the fact that the Ontario Court of Appeal and the British Columbia Court of Appeal seem to have different views on the law regarding causation could be some basis for believing there's something about the law regarding causation that's a wee bit controversial (even accepting that the division of powers structure in the Constitution Act means that that conflict IS constitutional).

Others (who are practising lawyers, I suspect) may have different views on whether the counsel involved in these cases did anything they ought not to have done or did not do something they ought to have done.

Sharon D. Nelson: Well, interesting, you kind of answered my next question, so I think I'm going to reshape it a little bit because I do think a lot of lawyers are worried about Artificial Intelligence replacing their jobs, and from my own perspective, I think a certain amount of that fear is justified, but I do understand what you're saying and I've watched with considerable admiration as you've kind of turned your ship a little bit into a different harbor because originally it was called ROSS: The Super-Intelligent Attorney, and now, you have more shaped ROSS from the point of view of the lawyer as somebody that allows the lawyer to be more efficient, serve the client better, and to focus on something other than what you might call «the goat work» of the legal world, which we really don't want to do, and so how did you come to the realization that that was something that needed to be done?

Oh, by the way, without web innovation we wouldn't even be able to post comments to each other on this web site, so there is that also... The verge should make an app for you to use, I guess... Oh wait, they did, and then they figured out that it's a ton of work to keep it updated across the different mobile platforms, so instead they updated their web page for desktop and mobile, and can iterate over the new versions faster because it's one codebase, and you can view it from every browser, and it's beautiful, and if something changes you don't have to install an update, you just get it when you visit the page... I also love apps, but we need both where it makes sense.