That is why I say that it is no
different with scripture.
Not exact matches
The other keynote address, that of Professor Chung, invoked —
with its gongs, drums, and appeals to read
Scripture from the perspective of birds, trees, and mountains — a very
different spirit.
Well, if it comes down to holy books, the oldest of the
scriptures — the Rigveda of India has a take which is very
different and much more in accordance
with what science is finding:
A church leader would have a good following of people in a particular town or city, and some other teacher would arrive in town, and begin to teach
Scripture in a
different way or
with a
different emphasis.
A growing number of people have by now found inspiration in the sacred
scriptures of the world and have been willing to join together in prayer
with members of
different religions.
Jesus was never afraid to touch the untouchable sam is giving good advice but in the
scriptures when a person in the old testament touched a leper or a dead person they became unclean that is our fear.What is
different with Jesus is that when he touched the lepers his righteousness made them clean instantly when he touched the dead they came to life that is the power of the holy spirit and that power is in all of us who believe by faith in Jesus Christ.So we do nt have to be afraid because we are covered in Christ.brentnz
Your comments suggest that you dismiss anyone
with a
different take on at least this topic as just catering to their fleshly desires and not being sincere in their searching of
scripture or their desire to honestly follow God.
I would recommend, as
with any translated religious
scripture, that you check out several versions translated by
different parties and note the differences before you come to any conclusions.
It does not take much interaction
with lay readers to see how enormously
different are the problems they see in
Scripture from those theologians are taught to see.
If you compared my writing from ten years ago
with the writing I do today, I use
different terminology,
different approaches to proving my point,
different vocabulary, and I even have
different theological beliefs, supported by reading passages of
Scripture in
different ways, all to accomplish
different goals in the minds and hearts of those who read.
Truly «Christian» art is not art that is blatantly about Jesus or
Scripture, but is art that touches people, connects
with lives, and calls people to a better and
different way of living.
And then we interpret the
Scripture based on this wrong belief that it was written by a later author
with a
different audience and for
different reasons.
The authors of
Scripture do not always speak
with one voice, but this is because they are presenting the question of the character of God in
different ways.
I do believe in the inerrancy of
Scripture, but
with a slightly
different twist than what is traditionally taught.
We would end up
with a fractured canon,
with bits and pieces taken out of their Scriptural context,
with a
different body of canon for each theological point of view, and
with those portions of
Scripture which we find uncomfortable not only ignored but disposed of altogether.
Historical - criticism always deals
with Scripture as a series of fragmented works from
different periods and by definition remains at the basic level of human hypothesis.
Jeremy i agree
with what you have written many of the traditions in the church have come from pagan beliefs.I thought some of the comments were judgemental of others especially towards those who are pagan.There response was respectful we can learn alot about having a good attitude towards others and responding to others kindly.I think using
scripture in a legalistic way is no
different than what the pharisees did to Jesus in his day and he disarmed them by rebuking them saying you without sin cast the first stone.regards brentnz
In our personal involvement
with scripture, it is easy to forget that these texts were written by authors who lived in a time, a place, a historical and cultural setting very
different from ours.
Extract yourself from the ivory tower
with its clinical reading of
scripture and immerse yourself in real life and things start to look a lot
different.
(It's a nuance, but this position holds even
with an inerrant view of
scripture and in
different epistemological contexts.)
A few years ago, in a moment of lonely desperation, I googled something having to do
with «Christians against biblical inerrancy» (for some reason you were on the first or second page of search results...) because I was trying to find out if there was anyone else who was thinking about the
Scriptures in a
different way from what I had encountered.
Ultimately, no I don't think that what the Councils is on level
with what
Scripture says because the Spirit's involvement is
different (just as the Spirit's involvement when a Preacher preaches is
different than when a Prophet prophesied in the Old and New Testaments), nevertheless, the Spirit is involved.
But not only does my reading of
scripture lead me to a
different conclusion, where there is uncertainty about such a situation, the safer position is to consider the possibility that renouncing Christ will result in you losing your life and forfeiting your promise of salvation, and determine before hand that you will never renounce Christ even should people threaten you or your families life
with death or torture.
And here we come into conflict
with different NT
Scriptures as we all know.
It was not uncommon to have between five and seven such teaching sessions every Sabbath in the local synagogue,
with different Rabbis teaching
different portions of
Scripture.
Other men and women disagree based on
different criteria, such as compliance
with scripture or church tradition.
Yes, this messes a bit
with our understanding of the inspiration of
Scripture, but in the end (at least for me) it amplifies the grace of God for it shows that He was speaking His truth to lots of people at
different times, not just to a select few Jews in a few hundred years of human history.
With you specifically, I would go to each and every one of those
Scriptures you quoted, and one at a time, show you how I think they mean something completely
different than the way you referred to them above.
We make Jesus fit our lifestyle... justifying actions or belief
with scripture that leave others scratching their heads... but it fascinates me how we are all so
different yet passionate about our walk of following Jesus.
It deals
with the authority of
Scripture and a
different way of understanding it.
So how can you have four
different account (some accounts
with RED letter statements this is want JESUS said) To a believer they do not hold a strong convention of the
scriptures and more so when they questioned.
Part of the difficulty
with the word «forgiveness» is that modern English speakers have put a slightly
different twist on the word than how people would have understood the equivalent Greek or Hebrew words in the
Scriptures when they were written.
Other notable films that will screen at TIFF include Tom Ford «s «Nocturnal Animals,»
with Jake Gyllenhaal and Amy Adams; «Whiplash» director Damien Chazelle «s musical «La La Land,»
with Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone; Peter Berg «s «Deepwater Horizon,» a true - life drama about the oil spill, starring Mark Wahlberg and Kurt Russell; Werner Herzog «s «Salt and Fire,» a drama in which Michael Shannon and Gael Garcia Bernal face ecological disaster in South America; Ewan McGregor «s Philip Roth adaptation «American Pastoral,» the actor's directorial debut; Denis Villeneuve «s sci - fi drama «Arrival,» formerly titled «Story of Your Life,»
with Amy Adams and Jeremy Renner; Juan Antonio Bayona «s «A Monster Calls»; «Denial,» Mick Jackson's drama starring Rachel Weisz as a historian sued by a Holocaust denier; Irish director Jim Sheridan «s «The Secret
Scripture,»
with Vanessa Redgrave and Rooney Mara playing two
different ages of a woman who keeps a diary of her time in a mental hospital; and «Mascots,» Christopher Guest «s comedy about the world of sports mascots.