The BBC was found to be in breach of r 2.11 of the Broadcasting Code that competitions should be conducted fairly and r 1.2.6 that due care must be taken over the physical and emotional welfare and
dignity of people under 18.
- Due care must be taken over the physical and emotional welfare and
the dignity of people under 18 who take part or are otherwise involved in programmes — irrespective of any consent given by the participant or by a parent guardian or other person over 18 in loco parentis.
Not exact matches
I did not see peace, comfort and
dignity, only a
person under the authority
of others.»
Pull out from
under democratic principles the beliefs
of Judaism and Christianity about the transcendent
dignity of the
person and the human propensity to sin, and the existing edifice
of democratic thought is exposed to radical doubt.
We enthusiastically affirm that the good
of the African
peoples is an indispensable condition for achieving the universal common good, but we acknowledge that the life conditions
under which many Africans live remain intolerable, an affront to the
dignity of all humankind.
People who have been detained
under the Act have been telling us how it fails to protect their rights and
dignity, and how they are kept out
of decisions about their own care.
According to the applicant, his arrest and detention constituted a gross violation
of an infringement upon his
dignity, personal liberty, fair hearing and freedom
of movement as enshrined and guaranteed
under sections 34, 35, 36,41,46
of the constitution
of the Federal Republic
of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) and Articles 4,5,6 and 12
of the African Charter on Human and
Peoples» Rights.
Within this perspective, Paul Weis describes refugees as «a vessel on the open sea, not sailing
under any flag ’23 while Hannah Arendt observed that refugees are without rights because each nation - state has primary obligation to protect the rights, interests and expectations of its own citizens first, no matter where they are.24 However, both international and national refugee laws are adopted with the sole aim to ensure entitlement of the basic rights, proclaimed under a range of human rights conventions.25 Under these conventions, respect for human dignity of each and every human person is underlined as a foundation to freedom, justice and p
under any flag ’23 while Hannah Arendt observed that refugees are without rights because each nation - state has primary obligation to protect the rights, interests and expectations
of its own citizens first, no matter where they are.24 However, both international and national refugee laws are adopted with the sole aim to ensure entitlement
of the basic rights, proclaimed
under a range of human rights conventions.25 Under these conventions, respect for human dignity of each and every human person is underlined as a foundation to freedom, justice and p
under a range
of human rights conventions.25
Under these conventions, respect for human dignity of each and every human person is underlined as a foundation to freedom, justice and p
Under these conventions, respect for human
dignity of each and every human
person is underlined as a foundation to freedom, justice and peace.
COPOH will submit that the right to choose who will assist oneself in dressing, bathing and toileting («basic
dignity») and the right to privacy in relation to personal
dignity is a basic right accorded to all human beings and protected as part
of «security
of the
person»
under s. 7
of the Charter.
Where Charter rights
of prisoners to
dignity and security
of their
persons conflict with the Charter right
of female employees to equality
of opportunity, it is necessary to balance the competing interests involved
under s. 1 rather than having one set
of rights override the other by virtue
of s. 15 (2).
It presages a law captured by the rhetoric
of the right to freedom
of expression without due regard to the value underlying the particular exercise
of that right; a law in which,
under the guise
of the right to freedom
of expression, the «right» to offend can be exercised without responsibility or restraint providing it does not cause a disruption or disturbance in the nature
of public disorder; a law in which an impoverished amoral concept
of «public order» is judicially ordained; a law in which the right to freedom
of expression trumps — or tramples upon — other rights and values which are the vital rights and properties
of a free and democratic society; a law to which any number
of vulnerable individuals and minorities may be exposed to uncivil, and even odious, ethnic, sexist, homophobic, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, and anti-Islamic taunts providing no public disorder results; a law in which good and decent
people can be used as fodder to promote a cause or promote an action for which they are not responsible and over which they have no direct control; a law which demeans the
dignity of the
persons adversely affected by those asserting their right to freedom
of expression in a disorderly or offensive manner; a law in which the mores or standards
of society are set without regard to the reasonable expectations
of citizens in a free and democratic society; and a law marked by a lack
of empathy by the sensibilities, feelings and emotional frailties
of people who can be deeply and genuinely affronted by language and behaviour that is beyond the pale in a civil and civilised society.
Indeed, to deny
persons with disabilities the same protections
under the law that are available to
persons without disabilities, would erode the values enshrined in Section 15
of the Code and would be damaging to the
dignity, self - respect and security
of the
person of individuals with disabilities.
DIGNITY - Respect for the worth
of every
person, recognition and commitment to the value
of diverse individuals and perspectives, and special concern for the poor and
under - served.
Show that you believe every single
person is deserving
of respect,
dignity, and equal rights
under the law.