Sentences with phrase «diluted eps»

For the twelve months ended March 31, 2011, the diluted shares used in the computation of Non-GAAP diluted EPS include participating shares of 5,615.

For the twelve months ended March 31, 2011, Non-GAAP diluted EPS has been calculated using the «if - converted» method as a result of the 4.375 % Convertible Senior Notes issued in June 2009 («4.375 % Convertible Notes»), for which diluted net income has been adjusted by $ 6,686 related to interest and debt issuance costs, net of tax.

Diluted EPS were $ 7.42, up over 11 % year - over-year, giving General Dynamics a 2014 dividend payout ratio of 37.2 % (based on an annualized dividend rate of $ 2.76).

When companies report diluted EPS, they calculate how much it would cost to buy back the shares exercised from in the money options adjusting for the tax benefit from the loss.

We're seeing earnings suffer accordingly, with FY 2012 underlying diluted EPS up +8.8 %, and 2012 EPS growth indicated at +5 - 10 %.

This gives me a LTM Basic EPS of $ 0.0392 or GBP 2.52 p. I've ignored Diluted EPS, as Outstanding Options are non-dilutive.

Over the past 19 years, operating profit's enjoyed a 13.0 % CAGR (versus a 14.7 % CAGR for the dividend), while FY adjusted / diluted EPS is forecast to be up 13 % yoy (I suspect we'll see a little better).

The Corporate Perspective: Yep, I've said it before, corporates usually don't give a flying f**k about adjusted diluted EPS & earnings growth rate, they're pretty meaningless to them.

[And that multiple's based on adjusted diluted EPS — use actual diluted EPS, and you're talking about a 37 P / E!?]

This gives us a 2014 diluted EPS of 0.73 p, and an 18 % EPS growth rate.

Not to mention UDG's colossal P / E multiple — 27.7 times continuing adjusted diluted EPS, no less — which doesn't remotely reflect the pedestrian underlying earnings growth we've actually seen in recent years.

And finally, I include 5 & 10 yr Adj Diluted EPS CAGRs to highlight any share issuance / dilution over the years.]

And like most tech companies, stock issuance along the way leaves diluted / ex-SBC diluted EPS growth at 13 - 14 % pa.

Noting a current 2.4 cent adjusted diluted EPS run - rate, I would propose a 1 cent per share dividend as prudent & sustainable.

On the one hand, let's rely on adjusted diluted EPS — noting UDG's stumbles in more recent years, and earnings growth of 11 % & 7 % in the past two years (respectively), I see no reason to raise my 10 P / E multiple.

At today's $ 868.39 $ GOOGL price, Alphabet trades on a 25.3 non-GAAP P / E (vs. 2016 ex-SBC diluted EPS of $ 34.34).

[Earnings have exploded accordingly, with adjusted diluted EPS up 62 % & 39 % in FYs - 2014 & 2015, respectively.

No change appears necessary to my 10 P / E ratio either, which we'll apply to the latest adjusted diluted eps of EUR 8.11 cts.

And if that delivers a nice bump in 2014 diluted EPS, we'll have 3 great years of overall revenue / earnings growth — which surely makes Universe an attractive growth stock, deserving of a decent P / E multiple?

This bears close monitoring, of course, but means I'm comfortable sticking with a 15 P / E multiple based on latest qtrly ex-interest diluted EPS of $ 0.1603.

LTM underlying diluted EPS (which bears no resemblance to actual IFRS EPS!)

As for earnings, we can't assume the same trajectory going forward, but looking ahead to consensus estimates a 20.0 Price / Earnings multiple (based on FY - 2015 adjusted diluted EPS) does appear justified:

Total Produce is clearly cheap on a 5.6 P / E (Adjusted Diluted EPS of EUR 6.92 cts) and a 4.6 % Dividend Yield (based on a EUR 1.783 ct Dividend).

As for earnings, that's yesterday's story, so a 10.0 P / E is perfectly adequate (based on a prospective 375 cents adjusted diluted EPS):

Also, with two years of 18 % basic EPS growth under our belts, let's now assign a P / E ratio: Noting adjusted diluted EPS is actually up 22.5 % yoy, Kingspan's prior growth history, and the wind clearly at their backs, a 20.0 Price / Earnings multiple's appropriate here.

, 6 - 9 % diluted EPS growth in the past 18 months, and barely breakeven cash flow (exc.

This is worth an increase from EUR 6.92 cents to EUR 7.13 cents in Adjusted Diluted EPS per share.

FBD's current portfolio composition & yield should normally produce a predictable shortfall in actual investment earnings, so we'll sensibly focus on diluted EPS here].

[Operating earnings are based on long term investment returns, while diluted EPS reflects actual returns.

Adjusted diluted EPS has clocked up the same increase, for a slow but steady 5.7 % CAGR.

Recognising the current & potential growth trajectory here, we should also factor / average an appropriate earnings multiple into our intrinsic value estimate: With earnings up 21 % & 70 % in the last two years, just about any multiple's justified... again, to be prudent, we'll limit ourselves to a 20.0 Price / Earnings ratio, based on a 123 cents adjusted diluted EPS H2 - 2015 run - rate:

However, this included EUR 3.3 mio of exceptional charges / impairment, which implies a pre-exceptional diluted EPS of EUR 0.664.

This makes for very consistent investment returns — add in a nice bump from their (small) equity allocation, and diluted EPS (of 131 cts) held up well vs. a decline in operating earnings (to 136 cts).

That obviously isn't sustainable — but annualizing Q4 diluted EPS of $ 0.53 & applying a 20 P / E multiple (reflecting the FY revenue growth rate) may appear high, but seems quite appropriate in this instance:

There's less clarity around underlying earnings growth, but an assumption of EPS growth in the teens seems reasonable — so a 15 P / E still works, based on a current GBP 34.6 p normalized / diluted EPS run - rate.

Operating profit declined 26 % to $ 855 mio, with margin almost halving from 14.1 % to 7.6 %, while diluted EPS fell 35 % from $ 1.81 to $ 1.18.

To recap, IFG looked marvelously cheap on an adjusted diluted EPS basis, but I could never reconcile the figures back to Operating Free Cashflow.

Taking a (more) enterprise - type approach (as any potential corporate acquirer would — they'll always focus on revenue, margins & cash flow... no company ever makes an acquisition based on some multiple of an adjusted diluted EPS figure!)

Net income actually dropped by 16 % in the period to GBP 6.8 mio, but somehow diluted EPS increased 46 % to GBP 25.45 p.

-- This level of dividend is based on Zamano's current 2.4 cents adjusted diluted EPS annual run - rate (as of end Jun - 2015).

The top line continues to look attractive — with net revenue growing 17 % in constant currency terms, but the operating profit margin contracted to 18.4 %, while adjusted diluted EPS growth slowed drastically to 5 % (also on a cc basis).

Unfortunately, 4 % growth in diluted EPS didn't keep abreast — a substantial portion of the (incremental) profit was earned in JVs, and dropped down into minorities.

Diluted EPS measures only a proforma reduction in EPS.

I've calculated them as Dividends Per Share divided by Normalized Diluted EPS, since I already had those two pieces of data:

If so, should you use basic or diluted EPS?

Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted EPS for the 2010 fourth quarter exclude $ 100 million pretax ($ 62 million after - tax and $ 0.16 per diluted share) of non-cash impairment and other charges, including an $ 84 million impairment charge related to a revenue management software investment (see below) and $ 27 million of impairment charges related to the anticipated disposition of a land parcel and a golf course.

Full year 2014 adjusted fully diluted EPS was $ 2.93 compared to the company's guidance range of $ 2.67 to $ 2.84, and $ 0.62 higher than 2013.

Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted EPS for full year 2010 exclude $ 100 million pretax ($ 62 million after - tax and $ 0.16 per diluted share) of impairment and other charges and an $ 85 million ($ 0.23 per diluted share) non-cash benefit in the provision for income taxes.

From a practical standpoint, when you understand these calculations, the implications become clear: If a company has a lot of potential dilution on its books, and the stock price then declines either due to a company - specific situation, a recession, or a broad stock market collapse, all of that dilution could disappear from the diluted EPS calculation.

Looking at the chart below, notice that in 2000, the difference between Intel's basic EPS and diluted EPS amounted to around $ 0.06.