Sentences with phrase «dimensions of responsiveness»
The two dimensions of responsiveness and demandingness can intersect in at least four ways.
http://www.developmentalscience.com/ Not exact matches
In addition to adding a new category to Baumrind's original scheme, researchers have re-stated her definitions in terms of two dimensions — «responsiveness» and «demandingness.»
In early childhood, two key dimensions of parenting quality are sensitivity and responsiveness to the child.
Diana Baumrind's study based on the two dimensions of «Parental Responsiveness» and «Parental Demandingness,» conclude that:
Developmental psychologist Diana Baumrind in her studies based on the dimensions of «Parental Responsiveness» and «Parental Demandingness» conclude that:
Since the advent of this type of research, generally conducted through direct observation and by questionnaires and interviews with parents and children, classification has been based on evaluations along two broad dimensions of parenting styles: control / demandingness (claims parents make on a child relating to maturity, supervision and discipline) and responsiveness (actions that foster individuality, self - regulation and self - assertion by being attuned and supportive).
Among the six dimensions there are Problem Solving (PS), Communication (CM), Roles (RL), Affective Involvement (AI), Affective Responsiveness (AR), and Behavioral Control (BC)(Shek, 2001): (1) problem solving (the capability of the family to cope with problems in order to keep effective family functioning); (2) CM (the way of exchanging information between family members); (3) RL (whether the family assign certain tasks to guarantee implementation of family functions); (4) AR (to which extent the family members emotionally react to stimulation); (5) AI (to which extent the family members show concern to each other); and (6) behavior control (the behavioral models that the family establishes to cope with stressful situations).
The grandparenting group scored higher on such dimensions of family functioning as Communication, Role, Affective Involvement, Affective Responsiveness, and General Family Function (GF) than their counterpart group.
Two reviewers will independently assess the suitability of the preference - based instruments for measuring outcomes in palliative care using the ISOQOL, minimum standards for patient - reported outcome measures (conceptual and measurement model, reliability, content validity, construct validity, responsiveness, interpretability of scores, translation of measure, patient and investigator burden), 43 and the CREATE checklist (descriptive system, health states values, sampling, preference data collection, study sample, modelling, scoring algorithm).44 The ISOQOL minimum standards were chosen as these standards were developed from a systematic review of published and unpublished guidance on patient - reported outcome measures, including the COnsensus - based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).46 To the authors» knowledge, the CREATE checklist is the only published guidance on what key components should be reported in a valuation study.44 Information on how the contents of the instruments were developed, psychometric properties and valuation will be used to assess the suitability of the instruments for the palliative setting; instruments will be scored on whether the domains or dimensions were developed using input from informal caregivers of people receiving palliative care (yes / no) and whether each of the reporting checklist items has been evaluated for this population (if yes, then a score of one will be allocated) and a total score calculated.
The support dimension can be represented as a range of positive and negative behavioral aspects such as acceptance, affection, love, support, warmth, responsiveness, sensitivity, communication and intimacy, but also hostility, neglect, and rejection (Rohner 2004; Rollins and Thomas 1979; Ten Haaf 1993).
To examine the role of diabetes - specific parental regulation and general parenting dimensions (responsiveness and psychological control) in treatment adherence throughout adolescence and emerging adulthood.
This study examined dimensions of callous behaviors in early childhood and the role of these behaviors in the development of conduct problems, as well as responsiveness to a family - centered preventative intervention.
The FAD contains seven subscales designed to assess the six dimensions of the McMaster Model of Family Functioning: Problem Solving, Communication, Roles, Affective Responsiveness, Affective Involvement and Behaviour Control, and contains a seventh General Functioning scale.
Mother - child interactions were coded by four raters on the dimensions of Maintaining Attention and Warm Sensitivity, the latter comprising the subscales of Positive Affect, Social Responsiveness, and Warm Concern.
This parallel increase of maternal sensitivity and child responsiveness, the major dimensions indicative of the adult's and the child's EA, seems to support the hypothesis of bi-directionality and reciprocity within adult — child relationships (Sander, 1977; Tronick, 1989; Beebe and Lachmann, 2002).
The coding system is composed of six scales / dimensions, four for the adult (sensitivity, structuring, non-intrusiveness, and non-hostility) and two aimed at evaluating the child's contribution (responsiveness, involvement of the adult).
The items included on the General Functioning Scale measure the overall health / pathology of the family relating to six dimensions of family functioning: a) problem solving, b) communication, c) roles, d) affective responsiveness, e) affective involvement, and f) behavioral control.
The cross-lagged effects of perceived psychological control remained significant after controlling for two important parenting dimensions (i.e., parental responsiveness and behavioral control; Study 1) and were found in all types of parent - adolescent dyads except for the mother - daughter dyad (Study 2).
Observers completed a total of 24 global ratings characterizing the mother - child interactions along the dimensions of: (1) gratification (degree to which mother and child each enjoyed the interaction), (2) sensitivity (mother's ability to be sensitive and appropriately responsive to her child's cues), (3) responsiveness (degree to which the child attended to and was engaged by the mother's attempts at interaction), (4) control / directiveness (degree to which the mother attempted to run the interaction in her own way), (5) involvement (amount of time the mother and child each spent interacting with the other), (6) clarity of commands (clearness of the mother's commands to her child), (7) follow - through of commands, and, (8) child compliance.