Company documents discovered during an eight - month investigation by InsideClimate News show that Exxon Research & Engineering estimated that producing and burning oil shales would release 1.4 to 3 times more carbon
dioxide than conventional oil, and would accelerate the doubling of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere by about five years.
To increase supplies, most companies are looking to tar sands in Canada or converting coal or natural gas into liquid fuels, technologies that emit far more carbon
dioxide than conventional oil does.
Not exact matches
A 2007 study by Susan Page of the University of Leicester found that one ton of palm
oil produced on peatland generates 15 to 70 tons of carbon
dioxide, largely the result of deforestation and draining of peatlands, making palm
oil - based - biofuels produced by peatlands conversion worse for climate
than burning of
conventional fossil fuels.
A study published in late April by an environmental group found that Europe's biofuel regulations created 80 percent more carbon
dioxide (CO2) emissions
than the
conventional oil they replaced.
On a lifetime basis, a gallon of gasoline made from tar sands produces about 15 % more carbon
dioxide emissions
than one made from
conventional oil.
The Contents: Spectra's FAQ about the project tout natural gas as being «the cleanest burning
conventional source of energy,» producing «45 % less carbon
dioxide than coal and 30 % less
than fuel
oil when burned.