Not exact matches
You shall further fully indemnify and keep Car Throttle fully indemnified against any costs, claim, demand, action, damages, loss and / or expense (including but not limited to any
direct, indirect or consequential losses, loss
of profit, loss
of reputation and all interest penalties, legal costs and any other reasonable costs and expenses suffered or incurred by Car Throttle) arising directly or indirectly from any
breach or non-performance by you
of this
Agreement and you shall pay all such costs, claim, demand, action, damages, loss and / or expense forthwith on demand by Car Throttle.
Do you think that, in the event
of a
breach by Singapore
of the social / environmental clauses
of the EUSFTA, individuals that suffered
direct damage could rely on this Opinion to argue that they have recourse to trigger the procedure for adopting a decision to terminate the
agreement?
NSPI claimed that Venezuela had
breached provisions
of the treaty by
directing its wholly owned coal supply company to suspend their
agreement and call for its renegotiation, acts that NSPI alleged cost it at least $ 180 million.
It used to be the law that
direct or physical interference was necessary for a
breach to occur «However, the more current view, and one with which I am in
agreement, is that any act by a landlord which is an interference with the tenant's ability to use the premises for the intended purposes, may constitute a
breach of the right to quiet enjoyment».
While serving as in - house general counsel, assisted in successfully resolving a
breach of non-competition
agreement matter in which the Chief Technology Officer attempted to work for a
direct competitor.
The application judge found that the two - member firm partnership had been dissolved and declared the restrictive covenant unenforceable as a penalty, but
directed a trial
of an issue to determine the damages payable by the appellant as a result
of a
breach of the portion
of the portion
of the covenant he found valid and severable — the withdrawal having triggered a clause in the
agreement which called for the reduction
of the withdrawing partner's capital account «by 500 %
of the average fees billed by the firm to clients who transfer to the withdrawing partner within 24... Read More
The application judge found that the two - member firm partnership had been dissolved and declared the restrictive covenant unenforceable as a penalty, but
directed a trial
of an issue to determine the damages payable by the appellant as a result
of a
breach of the portion
of the portion
of the covenant he found valid and severable — the withdrawal having triggered a clause in the
agreement which called for the reduction
of the withdrawing partner's capital account «by 500 %
of the average fees billed by the firm to clients who transfer to the withdrawing partner within 24 months
of the withdrawal date».