Sentences with phrase «direct effects of the sun»

They found a small correlation between cosmic rays and global temperatures occurring every 22 years; however, the changing cosmic ray rate lagged behind the change in temperatures by between one and two years, suggesting that the cause of the temperature rise might not be attributable to cosmic rays and cloud formation, but could be caused by the direct effects of the sun.

with respect to the direct effect of the sun on arctic meltinc, i failed to mention that sunspot activity has been directly correlated to warming and cooling trends over the course of geohistory.

Not exact matches

The best way to protect your baby's skin from the harmful effects of the sun is to prevent his skin from coming into direct contact with the sun's rays.

When the activity of the sun changes, it has direct effects on the earth.

The total energy in these particles is insignificant compared to the energy in the form of light from the sun, so the variation of the magnetic field will not have a direct effect on Earth climate.

The Sun has both direct and indirect influences over the Earth's temperature, and we can evaluate whether these effects could be responsible for a significant amount of the recent global warming.

«The effects of the sun are cumulative and so many women are running around with work, kids, and errands that they're spending a lot of time in direct sunlight without realizing it.

Having seen it in the sun, there is some metallic in the paint and while it's not a true matte color in the traditional sense, that's probably the effect when viewed indoors or out of the direct sunlight.

The Skeptical Science site refers to a paper by Flanner in 2009, a summary of which can be found here http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/tss/ahf/, that shows the direct heat from burning fossil fuels is just 1 % of the effect of the CO2 produced by this burning on the absorption of heat by the atmosphere from the sun, i.e. global warming.

This is why (absent sufficient solar or other non-LW heating) the skin temperature is lower than the effective radiating temperature of the planet (in analogy to the sun, the SW radiation from the sun is like the LW radiation, and the direct «solar heating» of the part of the atmosphere above the photosphere may have to due with electromagnetic effects (as in macroscopic plasmas and fields, not so much radiation emitted as a function of temperature).

They have deliberately taken out the real direct heat from the Sun we can all feel as heat from the Sun, so they can pretend that any real world measurements of downwelling heat come from their fictional «Greenhouse Effect's backradiation / blanketing from the upwelling».

They have deliberately taken out the real direct heat from the Sun we can all feel as heat from the Sun, so they can pretend that any real world measurements of downwelling heat come their fictional «Greenhouse Effect's backradiation / blanketing from the the upwelling».

There appear to be some of you who don't know that longwave infrared aka thermal infrared aka radiant heat direct from the Sun has been excised from the AGWScienceFiction Greenhouse Effect Energy Budget.

Here's a hint: begins with a G. 3) So after all that blabing about moon, mercury and venus it is still hard to see how the obscure part of Venus (which is not recieving any direct radiation from the Sun) is still over 400 Celcius when on a plante much closer to the same sun temperatures plunge to a a hundred negative... since the Greenhouse effect does not exist it must be MAGIC, pardon me, SCIENSun) is still over 400 Celcius when on a plante much closer to the same sun temperatures plunge to a a hundred negative... since the Greenhouse effect does not exist it must be MAGIC, pardon me, SCIENsun temperatures plunge to a a hundred negative... since the Greenhouse effect does not exist it must be MAGIC, pardon me, SCIENCE.

The Greenhouse Effect is an impossible world with its Sun a cold Star of 6000 °C, around the temp of Earth's innards, but they have a good reason for this science fraud — to eliminate the direct radiant heat from our real millions of degrees hot real Star our Sun, so they can then pretend all real world measurements downwelling are from «the atmosphere backradiating by greenhouse gases», and not from the Sun.

Science: While it is true that plants photosynthesize, and therefore take up carbon dioxide as a way of forming energy with the help of the sun and water, this gas is both a direct pollutant (think acidification of oceans) and more importantly is linked to the greenhouse effect.

What I'm saying the effects are of the direct heat from the Sun excised from the GE EnergyBudget, is that all measurements of it in the atmosphere are attributed only to that produced by the heated Earth's surface.

It is the reason that AGWSF can conjure up its mythical «backradiation from greenhouse gases in the atmosphere», because it can ignore all the measurements and effects of direct real heat from the Sun which in the real world is the actually energy heating land and ocean, and us.

If cloud cover increases as sea ice decreases, that could offset the direct effect of the SIAF, especially if clouds increase in summer, when there is the most sun and the most sea - ice loss.

Because, all the real world measurements taken of downwelling longwave, thermal, infrared are now attributed as «from the atmosphere» and not from the Sun direct, beam, and therefore bounced back by these claimed greenhouse gases and so real rises in amount, as for example in the recent warming period we had from the Sun's activity, are fraudulently attributed to Greenhouse Effect backradiation.

Thermal infrared direct from the Sun, the longwave infrared which AGWScienceFiction has disappeared from its Greenhouse Effect Energy Budget, is not only capable of heating up matter, it is what is actually heating our land and oceans and us.

The Greenhouse Effect creates by another interesting sleight of hand the illusion of «backradiation of longwave infrared», by including real world measurements of the direct longwave infrared from the Sun, aka Heat energy, but which they have totally eliminated from their fictional world scenario.

[161] The most mature Sun ‐ climate mechanism at this time involves the direct effect of the observed variation in solar UV radiation affecting stratospheric ozone, leading to associated temperature variations.

The thermosphere is so thin that the heating of it from direct solar impacts has no significant damping effect on the cooling process that goes on below when the sun is more active.

Anyway, as I make the point here, The Greenhouse Effect is non-existant regardless of this mangling of real world physics, the comic cartoon of shortwave in and longwave out is stupid enough in claiming «that visible light heats ocean and lands and the heat direct from the Sun, thermal infrared, doesn't reach the Earth's surface and doesn't play any part in heating land and ocean», but, this warmist comic cartoon energy budget misses out the whole of the Water Cycle!

Perhaps a couple dozen people people should write several dozen papers studying what sort of direct and indirect effects the sun might have on our climate!

The reverse effect of a more quiescent sun reduces direct solar warming and, by permitting the penetration of cosmic rays, facilitates low cloud formation, which increases reflection of already reduced solar radiation, reduces clear sky, reduces evaporation and simultaneously reduces the availability of the most important greenhouse gas, water vapor, through condensation and precipitation.

The Sun has both direct and indirect influences over the Earth's temperature, and we can evaluate whether these effects could be responsible for a significant amount of the recent global warming.

2) The temperature of the DEEP oceans does have a direct effect on the surface temperatures, being the «base temperature» on which the sun does its warming magic.