Sentences with phrase «direct heating effect»

One important feedback, which is thought to approximately double the direct heating effect of carbon dioxide, involves water vapor, clouds and temperature.

Using electrically powered heat pumps to heat the water, rather than using the simpler but more direct heating effect from electrical resistance could increase the amount of heat per kWh of electricity up to three-fold.

For comparison, geothermal heat, the heat from Earth's hot interior leaking out through the crust, is about 45 TW or three times the direct heating effect of human activities.

The effects of wind / wave / tide / solar farms, whatever those effects might be, are going to be on the order of their power generation, like the direct heating effects of burning fuel.

Not exact matches

I used broil mode of my traditional oven which is nothing but directing the heat from top as it gives the authentic burnt effect to the chicken while grilling.]

Being in poor health can lead to poor mental health, but what are the direct effects of not being able to afford to heat your home on mental health?

Lead scientist Jeffrey Hawkes, currently a postdoctoral fellow at Uppsala University in Sweden, directed an experiment in which the researchers heated water in a laboratory to 380 degrees Celsius (716 degrees Fahrenheit) in a scientific pressure cooker to mimic the effect of ocean water passing through hydrothermal vents.

In August Sherwood and his collaborators published the results of a study that corrected for the heating effect of direct sunlight on older weather balloons.

Electro - thermal simulations, performed by PhD candidate Sampo Inkinen, showed that a combination of current - induced sample heating and electric - field - directed ion migration causes the switching effect.

«This is just a bizarre paper,» climate scientist Gavin Schmidt, director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, said, adding that the effect of direct heating from burning fossil fuels is «completely trivial» on a global scale.

They point to direct effects resulting from rising temperatures and changes in the frequency and strength of storms, floods, droughts, and heat - waves — as well as to less direct impacts, such as changes in crop yields, the burden and distribution of infectious disease, and climate - induced population displacement and violent conflict.

During solar flares, variation in the solar flux in the spectral range extending from the UV to the X-ray wavelengths can have a direct effect on the ionization of the atmospheres of planetary bodies as well as on their heating and dimensions (for details see Schunk & Nagy 2009).

Regardless of how hot the Sahara may feel when you stand in it, the difference in radiative effect between it and rainforest is in its higher albedo, reflecting more direct sunlight, the darker forests absorb more heat.

A clear illustration of direct effects of fossil fuels on human health was provided by an inadvertent experiment in China during the 1950 — 1980 period of central planning, when free coal for winter heating was provided to North China but not to the rest of the country.

«The warming effect could be through the direct heating to the air, snow and sea ice by absorbing sunlight, and then accelerating the melting of snow and sea ice,» Wang said.

1 — Direct Cancer Cell Death: The principle of hyperthermia is that cancer cells are much more sensitive to and intolerant of the effects of excessive heat than normal cells.

Funny thing, this resulted in a direct effect on heat production via uncoupling (ie, can't be «out - exercised»), in a system that could be band - aided with cold exposure.

By comparison, conventional saunas must rely only on indirect means of heat: first, on convection (air currents) and then, conduction (direct contact of hot air with the skin) to produce its heating effect.

Mainly thanks to direct fuel injection with stratified charge (it sounds better if you say iniezione diretta stratificata), and the 12.5:1 compression ratio it allows because squirting the fuel directly into the cylinder has the effect of cooling the air that has been heated by compression.

HIGHLIGHTS FOR 2013 Veloster Turbo (Exclusive Turbo features) • Powered by a new 1.6 - liter Turbocharged - Gasoline Direct Injection (T - GDI) engine and in - house six - speed automatic or manual transmission • Horsepower: 201 at 6000 RPM • Best - in - class highway fuel economy estimated at 38 mpg (M / T) • Best - in - class specific output at 125.6 horsepower per liter • Best - in - class weight to power ratio of 14 lbs / hp • Sport - tuned engine intake and exhaust note • Sport - tuned steering • Unique front fascia, foglights and ground effects • Hyundai - first Matte Gray paint • Unique 18 - inch alloy wheels with chrome inserts • Projection headlights with unique LED headlight accents • Side mirrors with turn signal indicators • Unique LED taillights • Supervision cluster • Leather seating surfaces with driver's lumbar support • Heated front seats • Turbo exclusive Graphite Black interior with Blue accents and headliner graphics

Immature flea life stages are susceptible to the effects of drying, extreme heat and cold and direct sunlight.

The Skeptical Science site refers to a paper by Flanner in 2009, a summary of which can be found here http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/tss/ahf/, that shows the direct heat from burning fossil fuels is just 1 % of the effect of the CO2 produced by this burning on the absorption of heat by the atmosphere from the sun, i.e. global warming.

Before allowing the temperature to respond, we can consider the forcing at the tropopause (TRPP) and at TOA, both reductions in net upward fluxes (though at TOA, the net upward LW flux is simply the OLR); my point is that even without direct solar heating above the tropopause, the forcing at TOA can be less than the forcing at TRPP (as explained in detail for CO2 in my 348, but in general, it is possible to bring the net upward flux at TRPP toward zero but even with saturation at TOA, the nonzero skin temperature requires some nonzero net upward flux to remain — now it just depends on what the net fluxes were before we made the changes, and whether the proportionality of forcings at TRPP and TOA is similar if the effect has not approached saturation at TRPP); the forcing at TRPP is the forcing on the surface + troposphere, which they must warm up to balance, while the forcing difference between TOA and TRPP is the forcing on the stratosphere; if the forcing at TRPP is larger than at TOA, the stratosphere must cool, reducing outward fluxes from the stratosphere by the same total amount as the difference in forcings between TRPP and TOA.

(This doesn't include any solar - heating (albedo, etc.) feedbacks, which is necessary for a direct comparison; the GHE warming of about 33 K is only the effect of the atmopheric LW optical thickness, and thus doesn't include any feedbacks on solar heating)

Regardless of how hot the Sahara may feel when you stand in it, the difference in radiative effect between it and rainforest is in its higher albedo, reflecting more direct sunlight, the darker forests absorb more heat.

«This is just a bizarre paper,» climate scientist Gavin Schmidt, director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, said, adding that the effect of direct heating from burning fossil fuels is «completely trivial» on a global scale.

This is why (absent sufficient solar or other non-LW heating) the skin temperature is lower than the effective radiating temperature of the planet (in analogy to the sun, the SW radiation from the sun is like the LW radiation, and the direct «solar heating» of the part of the atmosphere above the photosphere may have to due with electromagnetic effects (as in macroscopic plasmas and fields, not so much radiation emitted as a function of temperature).

They have deliberately taken out the real direct heat from the Sun we can all feel as heat from the Sun, so they can pretend that any real world measurements of downwelling heat come from their fictional «Greenhouse Effect's backradiation / blanketing from the upwelling».

They have deliberately taken out the real direct heat from the Sun we can all feel as heat from the Sun, so they can pretend that any real world measurements of downwelling heat come their fictional «Greenhouse Effect's backradiation / blanketing from the the upwelling».

By taking the estimate of 0.1 degrees C per decade and multiplying by 5 to get 0.5 degrees C, or 44 %, Geoffry Smith gets a rather larger figure for his urban heat island effect estimate than he would from the more direct subtraction of 0.81 from 1.13 (0.32 degrees C, or 38 %).

There appear to be some of you who don't know that longwave infrared aka thermal infrared aka radiant heat direct from the Sun has been excised from the AGWScienceFiction Greenhouse Effect Energy Budget.

The AGWScienceFiction's Greenhouse Effect Illusion does not have the Sun's direct radiant heat, thermal infrared aka longwave infrared.

The most recent report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change states with «very high confidence» that «the health of human populations is sensitive to shifts in weather patterns and other aspects of climate change» due to direct effects — such as changes in temperature and precipitation or occurrence of heat waves, floods, droughts, and fires — as well as indirect effects — through crop failures, shifting patterns of disease vectors, or displacement of populations.

The Greenhouse Effect is an impossible world with its Sun a cold Star of 6000 °C, around the temp of Earth's innards, but they have a good reason for this science fraud — to eliminate the direct radiant heat from our real millions of degrees hot real Star our Sun, so they can then pretend all real world measurements downwelling are from «the atmosphere backradiating by greenhouse gases», and not from the Sun.

What I'm saying the effects are of the direct heat from the Sun excised from the GE EnergyBudget, is that all measurements of it in the atmosphere are attributed only to that produced by the heated Earth's surface.

It is the reason that AGWSF can conjure up its mythical «backradiation from greenhouse gases in the atmosphere», because it can ignore all the measurements and effects of direct real heat from the Sun which in the real world is the actually energy heating land and ocean, and us.

It takes the great direct heat energy from the Sun to heat up our oceans and land, and, this has been excised from the AGWSF Greenhouse Effect Energy Budget.

This is an extraordinary claim that the Greenhouse Effect is making, it is saying «that heat from the Sun, direct longwave infrared, plays no part in heating the land and ocean and that this is done instead by the visible light from the Sun».

Thermal infrared direct from the Sun, the longwave infrared which AGWScienceFiction has disappeared from its Greenhouse Effect Energy Budget, is not only capable of heating up matter, it is what is actually heating our land and oceans and us.

The Greenhouse Effect creates by another interesting sleight of hand the illusion of «backradiation of longwave infrared», by including real world measurements of the direct longwave infrared from the Sun, aka Heat energy, but which they have totally eliminated from their fictional world scenario.

I have been explaining that the science establishment, as you put it, has excised the real direct heat we get from the Sun — FROM ITS GREENHOUSE EFFECT ENERGY BUDGET — and substituted in its place visible light from the Sun.

The circulation pattern described above — ascent in the equatorial trough, poleward movement in the upper troposphere, descent in the subtropical ridges, and equatorward movement in the trade winds — is in effect a direct heat engine, which meteorologists call the Hadley cell.

The newest entry in the theological literature is Parker (2004, 2006), who, once again, does not show the absence of an urban heat island by direct measurements, but purports to show the absence of an effect on large - scale averages by showing that the temperature trends on calm days is comparable to that on windy days.

The thermosphere is so thin that the heating of it from direct solar impacts has no significant damping effect on the cooling process that goes on below when the sun is more active.

Direct heating or cooling by radiational effects within the air parcel itself is usually negligible2.

And as for the other major player in the energy budget, the Sun, that too has been distorted beyond recognition in The Greenhouse Effect energy budget — gosh, no direct heat from your Sun even reaches Earth!

Anyway, as I make the point here, The Greenhouse Effect is non-existant regardless of this mangling of real world physics, the comic cartoon of shortwave in and longwave out is stupid enough in claiming «that visible light heats ocean and lands and the heat direct from the Sun, thermal infrared, doesn't reach the Earth's surface and doesn't play any part in heating land and ocean», but, this warmist comic cartoon energy budget misses out the whole of the Water Cycle!

A clear illustration of direct effects of fossil fuels on human health was provided by an inadvertent experiment in China during the 1950 — 1980 period of central planning, when free coal for winter heating was provided to North China but not to the rest of the country.

Convection at lower altitudes will punch through the thicker lower layers allowing a much more direct path for radiative effects to become efficient and unhindered in delivering the heat to space.

A report last year from the UK Energy Research Centre concluded: «For household heating, household cooling and personal automotive transport in developed countries, the direct rebound effect is likely to be less than 30 % and may be closer to 10 % for transport.»