The Government has said that leaving the European Union will «bring about an end to
the direct jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union.»
Not exact matches
One might have thought that that would be the end
of the matter, but instead Burnaby commenced this action in the Supreme
Court of British Columbia seeking a declaration (at para 13) «that the National Energy Board does not have the constitutional
jurisdiction to issue an order to the City
of Burnaby that
directs or limits the City
of Burnaby in the enforcement
of its bylaws.»
However, Justice I. E. Ekwo held that the Federal High
Court lacked
jurisdiction to entertain the suit and
directed that the case be transferred to the High
Court of Cross River State for hearing and determination.
The suit, filed in Albany in the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District
of New York, cites a ruling in that
jurisdiction earlier this year that the disclosure provisions
of the state's pioneering «truth - in - testing» law are in
direct conflict with federal copyright law.
(2) These proceedings also include a criminal or civil action resulting from an employee's performance
of safety - sensitive duties, in which a
court of competent
jurisdiction determines that the drug or alcohol test information sought is relevant to the case and issues an order
directing the employer to produce the information.
Should the referring
court find that, according to the particular values
of the legal order
of the Member State in which it has
jurisdiction, offences such as those committed by Mr I. pose a
direct threat to the calm and physical security
of the population, that should not necessarily lead to the expulsion
of the person concerned.
In similar fashion, EC Regulation 44/2001 and the EU
Court of Justice decision
of FBTO v Odenbreit allow British holidaymakers to initiate claims against the EU insurers
of negligent third parties in the English
jurisdiction, provided the country
of origin permits a
direct right
of action against an insurer.
Assume that Mr. Grutman's proposed test is as follows: «If the state long - arm statute is satisfied and defendant has engaged in purposeful conduct
directed at the forum state out
of which conduct the cause
of action arises, and that conduct satisfies the minimum contacts under which substantial justice and fair play make it reasonable to hail defendant into
court there, and the forum state has an interest in providing a forum to the plaintiff, then the forum has personal
jurisdiction over the defendant for that cause
of action.»
It's important to point out those rulings don't have any
direct impact here in Indiana, though
courts do look to other
jurisdictions that have weighed similar matters when considering issues
of first impression, so it's plausible those decisions could become relevant.
Chief Justice O'Connor's majority opinion reasoned that a lack
of standing to invoke
jurisdiction was not a defect in the trial
court's «subject matter
jurisdiction,» and, therefore, any lack
of standing had to be raised during the case or in a
direct appeal from the judgment.
After the federal parties filed their notice
of appeal to this
Court from the District
Court's grant
of the preliminary injunction as to «indecent» communication, the
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit entered an order
directing Sable either to file a motion for voluntary dismissal or to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack
of jurisdiction.
The report noted this review could be administered either by a statutory appeal provision in the tribunal's governing legislation or via the inherent
jurisdiction of a superior
court to engage in judicial review, but the report advocated more strongly for the statutory appeal over judicial review because: (1) the basis
of the statutory appeal could be wider in scope and in remedies than judicial review; (2) the statutory appeal mechanism could be crafted to the unique characteristics
of the impugned tribunal and
direct the appeal to a particular level
of court; and (3) the appeal would be less costly and more expeditious than judicial review.
The final deal Britain strikes with the EU should not be subject to the
direct jurisdiction of the European
Court of Justice (CJEU), the Law Society has warned.
Where any obligation imposed by this Part is not complied with, the collecting body may, in addition to any other remedy available, apply to a
court of competent
jurisdiction for an order
directing compliance with that obligation.
And this is what I understand to be the meaning
of our lawyers, when they say that these civil corporations are liable to no visitation; that is, that the law having by immemorial usage appointed them to be visited and inspected by the king their founder, in his majesty's
court of king's bench, according to the rules
of the common law, they ought not to be visited elsewhere, or by any other authority.53 And this is so strictly true, that though the king by his letters patent had subjected the college
of physicians to the visitation
of four very respectable persons, the lord chancellor, the two chief justices, and the chief baron; though the college had accepted this carter with all possible marks
of acquiescence, and had acted under it for near a century; yet, in 1753, the authority
of this provision coming in dispute, on an appeal preferred to these supposed visitors, they
directed the legality
of their own appointment to be argued: and, as this college was a mere civil, and not an eleemosynary foundation, they at length determined, upon several days solemn debate, that they had no
jurisdiction as visitors; and remitted the appellant (if aggrieved) to his regular remedy in his majesty's
court of king's bench.
Written by local experts in key
jurisdictions, topics covered include: regulations governing
direct distribution; potential restrictions, financial and tax considerations on foreign businesses» operations; distribution structures available to suppliers; regulation
of relationships between suppliers and distributors; restrictions on the distribution
of competing products; relevant consumer protection laws; restrictions on contractual choice
of law,
courts or arbitration tribunals; and dispute resolution, mediation and arbitration procedures and processes.
These are only a few examples
of how the
Court has been transformed from a modest international
jurisdiction into a supranational hegemon, whose decisions have a
direct and significant impact on the rights and lives
of millions
of Europeans.
The
Court of Appeal upheld the first part of the trial judge's reasoning that the court had no jurisdiction to direct that an evidence of an accused could be given by video
Court of Appeal upheld the first part
of the trial judge's reasoning that the
court had no jurisdiction to direct that an evidence of an accused could be given by video
court had no
jurisdiction to
direct that an evidence
of an accused could be given by video link.
(1) The
Court has power, in relation to matters in which it has
jurisdiction, to make orders
of such kinds, and to issue, or
direct the issue
of, writs
of such kinds, as the
Court considers appropriate.
Based on the exemptions, New York
courts have allowed
jurisdiction over out -
of - state defendants when the defamatory statement arose out
of business activities
directed at the state, such as statements contained in a publication where most
of the work in preparing the work took place in New York.