Sentences with phrase «directed skeptic climate»

Not exact matches

I don; t believe you can answer with any real impactful results from climate skeptics, but I can point to direct $ $ results from rampant CAGW.

But there are several likely causes, the direct efforts of the climate skeptic movement just one of them, and probably one of the more minor causes.

When «Climategate» first broke, I noted the skeptic preoccupation with one tiny piece of climate science while neglecting the full weight of direct observations of current global warming.

Climate skeptics focused on scientific illiterates like Al Gore and a recent graduate named Michael Mann, allowing real leaders of the climate movement, like NAS President — Climatologist Ralph Cicerone — to continue directing federal research funds to support an unannounced 1945 social geo - engineering experiment to save themselves and the world from possible nuclear annihiClimate skeptics focused on scientific illiterates like Al Gore and a recent graduate named Michael Mann, allowing real leaders of the climate movement, like NAS President — Climatologist Ralph Cicerone — to continue directing federal research funds to support an unannounced 1945 social geo - engineering experiment to save themselves and the world from possible nuclear annihiclimate movement, like NAS President — Climatologist Ralph Cicerone — to continue directing federal research funds to support an unannounced 1945 social geo - engineering experiment to save themselves and the world from possible nuclear annihilation.

However, Kelly Sims Gallagher is not merely a coincidentally handy local Tufts University professor, she has direct connections with the same set of leaked industry memo phrases seen within the growing numbers of California global warming lawsuits — the «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» strategy phrase and the «older, less - educated males» / «younger, lower - income women» targeting phrases — which are widely repeated elsewhere as proof that the fossil fuel industry «pays skeptic climate scientists to participate in misinformation campaigns» undermining the certainty of catastrophic man - caused global warming (despite those memos being worthless as evidence, but that is another matter).

A question best directed to climate skeptics.

True skeptics understand that given the type and level of uncertainty (arguably most of what we deal with in climate other than direct observations), uncertainty is not «quantifiable» as in a pdf or something, but should be characterized in other ways.

This is inevitably going to be uncomfortable for «skeptics,» because every argument they have directed at climate scientists easily rebounds upon them.

Nonetheless, Christopher Monckton, a leading climate skeptic, called the panel corrupt, adding: «The chair is an Indian railroad engineer with very substantial direct and indirect financial vested interests in the matters covered in the climate panel's report.

Could you please direct me to the offices of the billionaires paying money to climate skeptics on Reddit?

Let's also contrast that with the direct claim by some climate skeptics that much of the warming is due to «ocean heat.»

DCI Group is a lobbying and PR firm, which has historically worked with R.J. Reynolds Tobacco and was behind the now - defunct Tech Central Station (TCS), a website that worked as a forum for climate change skeptics and received direct funding from ExxonMobil for «climate change support.»

Perhaps Gelbspan has no direct current involvement in global warming political efforts, but regarding the question of where he is these days, the answer seems to indicate that his collective past efforts are worthy of deep professional level investigation in relation to all the current focus on using racketeering laws to persecute skeptic climate scientists and the organizations having any association with them.

The first web link in the «ICE» (Information Council for the Environment) section of Desmogblog's piece last week (backup link here) is the only direct link to Greenpeace's ICE memo scans of the I've ever seen in 3 + years of looking into the smear of skeptic climate scientists.

Hansen, who directs the Goddard Institute, has become a target for climate change skeptics who say his activism undermines his science.

Pick any comment thread over the years of your blog, and no doubt you'll find a high % where concern is expressed by «skeptics» asserting a direct link between the source of funding and bias in the work of climate scientists.

But then, we could ask if people who genuinely fit the old definition of journalists — such as those seen on the PBS Newshour — are committing acts of journalism when they don't report half the story of global warming, and can't answer the direct question of why they've apparently excluded skeptic climate scientists» lengthy and detailed viewpoints from their program for the entire 20 year time their news outlet has been discussing the issue.

They imply my efforts of exposing the fatal faults in the smear of skeptic climate scientists are written by, directed by, approved by, and paid by people who supposedly shill for the fossil fuel industry.

Not to diminish the work of those advocating truth in science observations and exposing any kind of industry distortion / misinformation about cigarette smoking, but the elemental goal in attempts to create any sort of parallel here is that it must be established that skeptic climate scientists knowingly lie about the issue as a direct result of being paid to do so.

(Indeed, Anson's article treated those skeptical of the extent of the Y2K problem with the sort of derision that's currently directed toward climate skeptics.)

What I obviously point out time and again is that there is no evidence proving skeptic climate scientists knew catastrophic man - caused global warming was settled science but were corrupted by giant wads of illicit cash which caused them to spew industry - created / directed lies.