Damon: That came
directly out of authors communicating with us about their concerns.
Not exact matches
As a publisher, my biggest concern is the clutter
of the books being put
out by the major publishing houses along with those that are just put up
directly by
authors.
When it comes to royalties, there's a lot
of confusion
out there, but it seems most
authors believe their royalties are higher if they
directly publish with Amazon and other self - publishing offerings.
The idea that an
author can continue to produce well - received content on a fairly regular basis and sell it
directly to fans is limited to those who've made a full - fledged career
out of this
author thing.
Publishing industry events have been debating the ins and
outs of reaching readers
directly for several years, and companies have been exhibiting at these events for that same amount
of time, promising both publishers and
authors they could reach
out to book audiences and seamlessly sell content, wiping
out the need to pay fees or argue over how much a book should cost.
This makes it much less attractive for Amazon to deal with publishers rather than cutting them
out of the equation and dealing
directly with
authors or even with agents.
Imagine making
out individual checks to all the
authors who had books in their bookstores (thousands
of little checks a month...) Instead, they want to order
directly from the source — most likely Ingram's.
And to show I'm not talking
out of my as.s, I have two different newsletters myself that inform and sell,
directly or indirectly, my services to
authors.
And fairly soon this will all be moot anyway as publishers themselves are cut
out of the picture, and
authors go
directly from their own keyboards to their readers.
Not many
authors are clued into this feature yet, but in a matter
of weeks the #bymybook spam will be
out of control, as
authors will finally be able to
directly monetize their Tweets.
The Internet opens an array
of mechanisms for self - published
authors to reach
out to readers
directly and to offer them their books, easily and inexpensively produced, for just a few dollars.
If you choose to work together on a royalty - share basis,
authors can have a share
of their royalty be paid
out to the expert
directly by tredition.
Many ebook companies that allow
authors to market their manuscripts
directly make it difficult to weed
out «writers» who are looking for a bit
of extra cash or who don't keep their readers in mind.
By pursuing
authors directly, Amazon can cut
out the middleman and pass on the savings to
authors in the form
of higher advances and royalties, and to readers in the form
of lower book prices.
However, its importance has dwindled in recent years on account
of authors» ability to simply go
directly to Amazon or Ingram, and cut
out Lulu as the middleman.
Amazon is rolling
out a new program called @
authors that give users a chance to talk to the
authors of the books they are reading
directly from their Kindle.
In addition, the advent
of affordable, high - quality self - publishing has created a whole new need for developmental editing, because as
authors cut gatekeepers
out of the loop altogether and connect
directly with their readers, someone still needs to bring an objective eye to the process.
And specifically as relates to self - published
authors and paid reviews, how much sense does it make to shell
out money to breed a whole new class
of gatekeeping power brokers when what you want — as an
author — is to be able to
directly communicate your work to readers?
I know
authors will be sad to hear this: we all dream
of just sending manuscripts straight to a publisher, who will read them and
directly acquire
out books.
We have created a list
of a few
of the best podcasts
out there that speak
directly to the issues that self - publishing
authors face every single day.
As to what this all means for me, or for anyone interested in publishing
directly to readers, it means that prices will stabilize a bit more, affording independent
authors a better chance to figure
out what their own products are worth in the marketplace
of ideas.
*** We are agency and have become a publisher
out of the many requests from emerging
authors who have, after many disappointments looking, realized that traditional publishing is no longer available to emerging
authors either
directly or through agents ***
Slick book trailers take a lot more work and effort but people love the authenticity
of hearing an
author speak
directly so just make some video and get it
out there.
They are «excited to launch three new digital imprints, alongside the existing digital imprint LOVESWEPT, that will feed today's savvy readers by bringing the best, the boldest, and the newest voices
directly to them... this digital - only program will seek
out the best and brightest names in the next generation
of authors, enabling us to cultivate a team
of writers in the publishing world's most prolific and lively genres.
You just need to do your homework and find
out if the publishers that you want to approach accept manuscripts
directly from the
author and without the backing
of an agent.
These
authors have essentially been offered free, positive advertising that could
directly benefit their sales if they only made a little bit
of effort to reach
out and help promote their own work.
As stated above, the bibliography (sometimes known as a works cited page or a reference page) is a section that lists
out all
of the sources that the
author consulted, quoted, or referenced
directly or indirectly during the writing
of their book.
Within the next couple
of weeks Harper «will reach
out to
authors to make a concrete proposition» on how they «will be able to use the technology to sell
directly from their own websites» with some simple code.
They also worried that Amazon was moving to disintermediate publishers, or to cut them
out of the publishing cycle and deal
directly with
authors.
As regular IndieReader's know by now, by cutting
out the middleman
of publishers, indie
authors work
directly with online retailers to publish and distribute their books more quickly, more inexpensively to the consumer, and for a much larger share
of the profits than a «trad» publisher offers.
If Amazon slices
out a larger chunk
of the profit pie on each book, that is something that will
directly affect the
authors.
We're talking $ 150,000,000 a year going
directly to
authors, and if you sign with a major publisher, you are taking yourself
out of that pool.»
Kelly Gallagher [00:12:06] Sure, again, for most
authors that are starting
out, again, unless you have a strong platform, or you have an agent, or you're being
directly courted by a publishing house to write a book, the idea
of an advance is not likely going to be in the cards for you, or if it is, it would be probably a small four figure number.
Many people are reluctant to provide negative feedback
directly to the
author, so Collins recommends taking yourself
out of the voting process.
We should try
out new business models in our dealings with rights holders: Buy
directly from rights holders, including
authors; host your own ebook content; or offer library users the choice
of purchasing ebooks through the library catalog when the waitlist is too long.
I think that, because self - publishing has gotten easier, because the tools have gotten easier to use and there are so many more services available to self - published
authors, you can compete
directly with the work that's coming
out of these major publishing houses.
Check
out the articles below and determine whether or not the
author is deserving
of your Twitter fandom; you can even follow them
directly from the embedded tweets on this page!