This is a critical element of the draft environmental review because while State determined that tar sands is
dirtier than conventional oil, it concludes that Keystone XL would have little impact on the expansion of tar sands and therefore policymakers and the public needn't consider the impacts of that expansion.
Non-traditional fossil fuel promises to be much
dirtier than conventional oil.
Not exact matches
Berman, author of This Crazy Time and co-founder of ForestEthics, pointed out that every independent study, including one from the U.S. Department of Energy, has found that the
oil sands are one of the world's
dirtiest forms of
oil, producing three times more greenhouse gas emissions per barrel produced, and 22 per cent more
than conventional oil when their full life cycle of emissions, including burning them in a vehicle, is included.
Tar sands
oil is one of the
dirtiest fossil fuels in commercial production today and produces three to five times more climate changing emissions
than conventional crude
oil.
Tar sands
oil is the
dirtiest on Earth, and the Environmental Protection Agency has said clearly that tar sands production releases 82 percent more greenhouse gas emissions
than conventional oil.
Furthermore, the Canadian tar sands
oil, while certainly «
dirtier» to extract
than traditional
oil sources, releases roughly 15 percent more CO2 per barrel
than conventional oil.