Earthjustice is protecting our right to breathe clean air by making
dirty industries clean up their pollution and prevent the harm they cause to nearby communities.
Not exact matches
Roscheisen explains how his company is
cleaning up a
dirty industry — while designing some very chic jewelry.
Those who are fighting
clean energy focus on high prices, but at the same time they don't talk about the real costs for the people who live with those
dirty industries.
To help
clean out America's shelters, two pet
industry leaders, Wahl and Petfinder Foundation, are addressing a
dirty issue about pet adoption, and in the process giving thousands of shelter dogs a fresh start.
Using the so - called «
clean - coal», a term created by the coal
industry's PR firms, will still leave us with the
dirtiest energy source in the nation.
If
industry - generated aerosols have a more limited cooling effect than originally thought, we can
clean up and scale down
dirty coal plants without worrying too much about consequent sudden jumps in global temperatures of up to 2 degrees C (if I remember the upper limits of earlier studies correctly).
Alberta's tar sands
industry took a couple of major hits over the last two weeks, in large part because of the great job
clean energy advocates have done raising the profile of the problems and risks associated with the
dirty energy project.
Some progressives actively distrust policies that lean hard on price signals, partly for fear that workers in
dirty industries will be penalized as investment migrates to
cleaner alternatives.
Recent legal decisions that Earthjustice has helped to secure have affirmed EPA's authority under the
Clean Air Act to reduce climate pollution from vehicles and industrial facilities, but anti-environmental members of Congress and the
dirty energy
industry are determined to prevent any action to reduce dangerous climate pollution.
«Weaning ourselves off
dirty industries into
clean industries... is going to create a lot more jobs than we are going to lose in oil and gas or mining.»
All the options for the EU proposed for climate action by 2030 put
dirty industry interests ahead of citizens and the planet and will not bring about the transition to the
clean energy system urgently needed.»
We know that things like energy independence, getting off oil, getting out of the Middle East, and creating jobs and economic development in the new
clean energy
industries of the future are much higher priorities for most voters than capping carbon emissions or taxing
dirty energy sources.
Despite rising public concern about global warming and a growing awareness that coal is an irrevocably
dirty business, the
industry is spending millions of dollars on a slick messaging campaign stressing its «commitment to
clean.»
So, rather than claim that fracking is good because it creates jobs, maybe CEOs in the energy
industry should look towards sustainability, and recognize that, by definition, a sustainable energy
industry will create jobs for a longer time than an unsustainable one, and the change from
dirty to
clean energy will yield short - term jobs and long - term profitability without the massive downside of fossil fuels.
And then again in the 80s - 90s as
clean air regs toughened and the
dirty old Soviet Union / East Euro
industries tanked.
Will these permits provide a buffer (or windfall) which sustains these
dirty industries (to the suppression of
cleaner alternatives), or will these permits have no value at all?
The House passed amendments, drafted by
industry, to the landmark
Clean Water Act — ridiculed by opponents as the
Dirty Water Act — and that was so unpalatable to Senate Republicans that it went nowhere.
And while biofuels and electricity producers are
cleaning up, the oil
industry should do the same, reducing avoidable emissions, avoiding the
dirtiest sources of oil, and preventing the oil we do use from getting worse.
The options they are considering put
dirty industry interests ahead of citizens and the planet and will not bring about the transition to the
clean energy system urgently needed, reacted Friends of the Earth Europe.
Until
clean energy replaces
dirty fossil fuels, the
industry should work to find best practices to curb flaring.
Affiliated under the banner of the State Policy Network, these groups have also coordinated against
clean energy in states like North Carolina and Ohio, where
dirty energy giants may score a victory against renewable
industry jobs.
The coal
industry claimed they had
cleaned up
dirty coal eliminating the «black froth» on streams so that nearby waterways would remain «pristine.»
This ensures that these powerful corporations have the ear of lawmakers, and can influence them to expand support for
dirty energy sources at the expense of the
clean energy
industry, U.S. taxpayers, and the climate.
From the «Could» a, would» a, should» a» Comment Department: we might note that it was by using a classic interference with the market that the fossil fuel
industry promoted
dirty fuels — it worked to hide the true cost accounting of coal and all carbon fuels - and even funded the political suppression of
clean energy — wind and solar.
While such a program won't do anything to extinguish the «carbon neutral: good or bad» debate (and may only add fuel to the fire), shipping is a huge,
dirty industry, and we think it'd be awfully nice to be able to move, ship furniture and more with a
cleaner conscience.
While it's true that the oil lobby, another
dirty industry, targets mostly Republican members, Democrats are by no means innocent, or
clean.
But the most interesting part of the segment is an interview with Joe Lucas, head of the American Coalition for
Clean Coal Electricity (nee Americans for Balanced Energy Choices), a coal industry front group that has spent tens of millions of dollars on deceptive advertising and political activities, as well as more than $ 10.5 million to lobby Congress directly on behalf of dirty coal and against legislation to fight global warming and promote clean, renewable electri
Clean Coal Electricity (nee Americans for Balanced Energy Choices), a coal
industry front group that has spent tens of millions of dollars on deceptive advertising and political activities, as well as more than $ 10.5 million to lobby Congress directly on behalf of
dirty coal and against legislation to fight global warming and promote
clean, renewable electri
clean, renewable electricity.
The bill, which was openly written with the help of lobbyists, has now gotten bipartisan support from one of the chief opponents of
clean energy reform from the Democratic side of the aisle — any guesses on who it is?It's our friend, Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D - AR)-- she has cosponsored the amendment, popularly known as the
Dirty Air Act, and seeks to protect the interests of heavily polluting
industries.
Clean Coal Carolers From an
Industry Run by Morons There Is NO Such Thing as
Clean Coal
Dirty Clean Coal Lobby Gave $ 240,000 to Obama Presidential Campaign Carbon Capture and Storage Carbon Capture and Storage Will Happen - Here's Why We Should Support It Liability Insurance Bailouts Needed for Carbon Capture and Sequestration
Industry?
Worldwide, the coal
industry is suffering as the demand for its product weakens in the face of a surge in
clean, renewable energy options and a world that can no longer afford to continue to consume this
dirty fossil fuel.
The fossil fuel
industry tried to turn
clean energy into something
dirty during the political campaign season.