80 % of AP teachers agree that today's digital technologies are leading to greater disparities between affluent and
disadvantaged schools and school districts.
More than 80 % of AP teachers agree that today's digital technologies are leading to greater disparities between affluent and
disadvantaged schools and school districts (Pew Research Center 2013).
Only 54 percent of middle school and high school teachers surveyed thought their students «have sufficient access to digital tools at school,» according to a 2013 Pew Research Center survey, and 84 percent said that «today's digital technologies are leading to greater disparities between affluent and
disadvantaged schools and school districts.»
Some 84 percent of teachers worry that technology is contributing to greater disparities between affluent and
disadvantaged schools and school districts, according to the Pew Research Center.
Not exact matches
As most would guess, kids with more
disadvantages, such as poverty
and less educated parents, come to
school less prepared, which pulls down average test scores at
districts where more kids face these challenges.
We heard from directors
and managers working in
districts of every size
and socioeconomic makeup,
and in
schools large
and small,
disadvantaged and affluent we heard many of the same issues
and concerns echoed.
Our small
school district in rural Nebraska does breakfast before
school,
and although my girls do not go, I would say that it is a nice blend of students (not just economically
disadvantaged kids)
and works fairly well.
And in a large urban district like mine, where over 80 % of our kids are economically disadvantaged and a universal, in - class breakfast is the norm among our 300 schools, paying for that 1/2 cup increase is likely to be a big drain on our school food budg
And in a large urban
district like mine, where over 80 % of our kids are economically
disadvantaged and a universal, in - class breakfast is the norm among our 300 schools, paying for that 1/2 cup increase is likely to be a big drain on our school food budg
and a universal, in - class breakfast is the norm among our 300
schools, paying for that 1/2 cup increase is likely to be a big drain on our
school food budget.
In fact, there is substantial evidence that escape from the harmful effects of ability tracking in the
district schools is a major factor driving
disadvantaged families to charter
schools and private
school choice.
In other words, those who choose to change
schools within
districts appear to follow the same attributes, seeking out
schools with fewer academically
and economically
disadvantaged students.
The table reveals significant local heterogeneity not just in
disadvantage, but also in how
school districts exercise the discretion they have under the current ranking
and serving rules.
The U.S. Department of Education is embracing an approach to spending that rewards states
and districts for innovating instead of simply disbursing funds by formula to
schools and districts with
disadvantaged students, but this is leading to debates within the Democratic party, reports Nick Anderson of the Washington Post.
To put the gains in perspective, it may help to know that 5 to 6 percentile points is just under half of the gap between the average
disadvantaged, minority student in Chicago public
schools and the average middle - income, nonminority student in a suburban
district.»
In our recent article for Education Next, «Choosing the Right Growth Measure,» we laid out an argument for why we believe a proportional growth measure that levels the playing field between advantaged
and disadvantaged schools (represented in the article by a two - step value - added model) is the best choice for use in state
and district accountability systems.
As has been well documented, low - income
schools and districts are at a
disadvantage in the teacher labor market.
This indicates that while there are many reasons why
school districts and states might want to seek to integrate relatively advantaged
and relatively
disadvantaged students within the same
school, it appears unlikely that a policy goal of reducing the test score gap between students in these groups will be realized through further socioeconomic integration (at least once there gets to be the degree of socioeconomic integration necessary to be part of this study to begin with).
We next explore whether
schools differ in the extent to which relatively
disadvantaged students catch up to relatively advantaged students (or fall farther behind),
and we investigate the degree to which the differences we observe occur within
school districts,
and not just between these
districts.
But measured
school quality often varies dramatically within a
school district,
and therefore it is important to know whether individual
schools differ in the relative success of advantaged
and disadvantaged students.
Each with approximately 100 students per grade in grades 9 through 12, these
schools were created to serve some of the
district's most
disadvantaged students
and are located mainly in neighborhoods where large failing high
schools had been closed.
Half of the bond authority would be allocated to the 100
school districts with the largest number of
disadvantaged children,
and the other half would be allocated to the states.
On its face this is a laudable goal,
and reform - minded
districts (
and charter
schools) have made much progress in preparing
disadvantaged students for the rigors of challenging coursework.
On the surface, the current dispute about Title I comparability (the requirement that
schools within a
district must receive comparable resources from state
and local sources for education of
disadvantaged children before federal funds are added on) is all about money.
By incorporating teacher
and student input into the gorgeous new middle
school that will serve the
district's most
disadvantaged students starting next year, Frederick County is also ensuring that those early benefits it is carefully cultivating continue to grow.
This arrangement would be a strong deterrent to states
and districts that wish to continue their current approaches to funding their most
disadvantaged schools.
Last April, Public Advocates, one of the civil - rights groups that sued the state in 2010, said that multiple
school districts» plans showed a «near universal failure» to identify
and justify expenditures of dollars whose purpose was to benefit
disadvantaged students.
Accountability groups shall mean, for each public
school,
school district and charter
school, those groups of students for each grade level or annual high
school cohort, as described in paragraph (16) of this subdivision comprised of: all students; students from major racial
and ethnic groups, as set forth in subparagraph (bb)(2)(v) of this section; students with disabilities, as defined in section 200.1 of this Title, including, beginning with the 2009 - 2010
school year, students no longer identified as students with disabilities but who had been so identified during the preceding one or two
school years; students with limited English proficiency, as defined in Part 154 of this Title, including, beginning with the 2006 - 2007
school year, a student previously identified as a limited English proficient student during the preceding one or two
school years;
and economically
disadvantaged students, as identified pursuant to section 1113 (a)(5) of the NCLB, 20 U.S.C. section 6316 (a)(5)(Public Law, section 107 - 110, section 1113 [a][5], 115 STAT.
An increased share of
disadvantaged students could affect overall
district test scores, but with a gradual demographic shift, changes might be small or imperceptible from year to year
and don't necessarily indicate changes in
school quality, said Michael Hansen, director of the Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institution.
Since WUHSD became a PLC at Work
district in 2003, it has seen solid
and sustained growth in student performance across all five
schools, even with more than $ 17 million cut from the budget
and an increasing number of economically
disadvantaged students enrolled.
It increased funding to
school districts with a larger number of
disadvantaged students by financially weighting those students according to need, simplified current byzantine
school finance regulations,
and gave
school districts more autonomy over finances.
It must be said, however, that the digital divide (in terms of race, income
and location in terms of rural communities) remains a key factor that some studies indicate are leading to even greater disparities between well - to - do
and disadvantaged schools and districts.
It is critical that states
and school districts identify alternatives to data from meal applications so that high - poverty
schools that adopt community eligibility to feed more students are not
disadvantaged in any other context.
The sweeping education plan proposed by President Bush last week reflects a growing political consensus that the federal government should step up the pressure on states
and school districts to improve academic achievement, especially for
disadvantaged children, observers say.
Yes, I'm a big believer in the benefits of empowering low - income families with educational choice, but I'm not interested in having
disadvantaged boys
and girls transfer from lousy
district schools to lousy private
schools.
New Jersey's
school - finance system should be discarded because it shortchanges property - poor urban
districts and the
disadvantaged students they serve, a state administrative - law judge has ruled.
Programs serving the nation's economically
disadvantaged students
and those with disabilities are receiving massive funding boosts through the federal stimulus package — $ 13 billion for Title I aid
and $ 11.3 billion for special education — but how
school districts choose to use the money may set them up for problems when it dries up.
The idea is to create new
schools to serve the most
disadvantaged students, via mixtures of chartering, contracting - out,
and internal
district reform.
For example, Stamford Public
Schools in Connecticut — which scored a zero on the Isolation of Poverty Index and a zero on the Isolation of Wealth Index — has created a requirement that all schools be within 10 percentage points of the district's average share of «educationally disadvantaged» st
Schools in Connecticut — which scored a zero on the Isolation of Poverty Index
and a zero on the Isolation of Wealth Index — has created a requirement that all
schools be within 10 percentage points of the district's average share of «educationally disadvantaged» st
schools be within 10 percentage points of the
district's average share of «educationally
disadvantaged» students.
As in large
districts, large
schools have significant
disadvantages on all principal
and teacher leadership variables; principal
and teacher leadership diminish as we move from small to large buildings.
The Local Control Funding Formula unknots the state - imposed rules that had restricted the use of K - 12 dollars, directs more money to
disadvantaged children
and shifts control over spending to
school districts.
In a
school district, the better - resourced
schools tend to serve high - income populations in affluent communities,
and the under - funded
schools tend to serve low - income populations in
disadvantaged communities.
However, demonstrating compliance with these federal fiscal requirements — for example, comparability, in which
districts must show that they provide «comparable services» in high
and low poverty
schools through state
and local dollars — as well as the specific rules that govern each federal program, can introduce unnecessary burdens that distract from the overall goal of providing additional support to low - income
schools and disadvantaged students.
In both the 2014 - 15
and the 2015 - 2016
school years, ISL has had a greater percentage of its minority
and economically
disadvantaged students scoring at «Mastery or above» than the
district of New Orleans or the state.
For situations in which states are not progressively funding their
districts and schools, these requirements are important safeguards to protect
disadvantaged students.
This year's Grand Prize - winning
districts are providing opportunities for their most vulnerable students, cultivating a culture of kindness, respect,
and achievement districtwide,
and removing barriers to achievement for students with
disadvantages, with the support of their
school leaders.
The Senate version of Gov. Jerry Brown's
school finance restructuring proposal would require
district and county administrators to hold public hearings
and develop plans detailing how they will use additional state support to improve the performance of educationally
disadvantaged students...
The Elementary
and Secondary Education Act's original purpose was to improve the education of
disadvantaged students
and to ensure that the
schools and districts that serve these students had additional resources to meet their needs.
Reliance upon supplemental funding through bonds
and overrides
disadvantages schools; while wealthy
districts may be able to generate additional resources, they don't always have community support
and underprivileged communities — serving Latino students in particular — often don't take the risk due to the little reward.
There are plenty of you working in
districts where a significant portion of the population is economically
disadvantaged,
and most
school districts have tight budgets, so this can be a very real issue.
Because when parents - particularly economically
disadvantaged parents in urban
districts - have more power, they demand more
and better choices for their kids,
and they put pressure on
schools to improve.
In Oklahoma, it has played a critical role in helping
districts combat the statewide teacher shortage, closing student achievement gaps in
disadvantaged schools and building education leaders.