Not exact matches
But for instance, I can
disagree with a Lutheran
on Baptism and we are still brothers in Christ.
We are not powerless and fearful, not us: and so I pray and I work; I make coffee in the morning and hot meals to gather around the table at suppertime; I worship and sing out words of promise and praise; I raise children and read good books; I pray for my enemies and write letters and send money and show up to fold clothes and drop off meals with an extra bag of groceries; I advocate with the marginalized and amplify the oppressed and antagonize the Empire with a grin
on my face; I will honour those who get after the work of the Kingdom and celebrate; I learn how to listen to those with whom I
disagree; I abandon the idea that we can baptize sinful practices in the name of sacred purposes; I will stand in the middle of the field near my house with my face turned up to the rain and consider it a minor
baptism.
Many Christian traditions believe that a real, literal change takes place when we participate in sacraments like communion or
baptism, though we
disagree on how that change works.
Because we
disagree on the proper method of
baptism, the role of women in the church or the proper interpretation of a certain Biblical passage does not make one of us correct and the other a «false teacher».
I have to strongly
disagree with you
on Baptism.
So,
on this view, if someone
disagrees with them about the millennium, about infant
baptism, about the role of women in ministry, they are quickly labeled a heretic.
With researchers
disagreeing wildly
on both points, this promises to be something of a
baptism of fire — especially since the FDA has long made it clear it will only approve drugs for specific conditions, not vague groups of symptoms.