«You have to establish at the beginning:
We disagree on a lot of things now, but when do we agree that the negotiations will end?»
You and
I disagree on a lot of things, but I've said before and I'll say it again, if someone was going to discriminate against you because of what you believe (unless it was a religious organization that had different beliefs) I'd stand with you.
We may
disagree on a lot of things, but I'm sure that we are in agreement in loving Christ and trying to change the world that is into the world that God wants it to be.
We disagree on a lot of things which is fine — it's good discourse.
Not exact matches
FLAKE: There are a
lot of things I
disagreed with President Obama
on with regard to foreign policy, and domestic policy as well.
There are
lots of ways to accomplish that, but one
thing's for sure: When members
of a management team
disagree on something important, there has to be one clear leader who decides which path to choose.
The second
thing I noticed is that while Comfort and Metzger agreed a
lot of the time
on which textual variant is preferred, they
disagreed a
lot as well.
Amen.The
thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a
lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it
on a human logic level, for me.You may
disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.
So this mindset puts you add odds with a whole
lot of other people, who even though they may
disagree on things, may actually be able to discuss their differences in a civilized way.
«I think we're going to agree
on a
lot of things because we have a very similar philosophy, but at times we
disagree and I know that she will fight energetically for what she believes is right.»
Food experts and nutritionists have
disagreed about a
lot of things over the years — the role
of fat, the benefits and drawbacks
of animal protein — but amidst these debates, they have always been able to agree
on at least one
thing: MORE PLANTS = GOOD.
I've learned
lots of things from people who
disagree with me
on important points.
It will be no surprise to you that I
disagree with a
lot of your points here and while I didn't expect a debate
on this, I'll answer your comments in a bit
of detail as I have strong opinions
on this type
of thing.
Unfortunately, a
lot of folks
on the left seem to think that the main
thing we need to do is separate ourselves from other activists by focusing
on where we
disagree.
Three reasons I try to focus
on fundamentals instead
of falling head over heels in love with one particular formalistic procedure related to the fundamentals... (1) I did a
lot of work with QM, and thrice (old quantum mechanics, then Heisenberg vs. Schroedinger, then Feynman vs. Schwinger vs. Tomonaga) the field went through confused situations where
disagreed - upon
things turned out to be fundamentally the same.
We
disagree on this subject, but there are a
lot of things we do agree
on, so.........