There is an acceptance of your differences, an understanding that you may
disagree on certain issues but love each other nonetheless.
«brush the teeth» or «comb the hair» doesn't sound terrible, but improving your written English with the right words can help improve your ability to communicate without awkward interruptions.However, don't be too concerned with this minor rule because English speakers may
disagree on certain ways to use «the» in a conversation.
«We can
disagree on certain issues that come before us, but I just want to thank her for her service on the West Side,» he said.
Even if
you disagree on certain things, don't dismiss their experience.
One of my best friends is an Athiest and although
we disagree on certain things, our respect and care for one another is undeniable.
During last summer's funding debate, appropriators in turn rejected the breadth of these proposed cuts, though the House and Senate still
disagreed on certain areas including climate research.
(Enemy means
you disagreed on certain questions or differed on their importance.)
Not exact matches
Let me boil this down more specifically: my wife Lisa and I
disagree theologically
on certain issues.
In my own tradition, which is Lutheran, we commonly understand ourselves as quite content to be Catholic except when,
on certain questions, we are compelled to
disagree.
The student learns that
certain books are great, but they
disagree on God, morality, science, and all that.
with over 2 billion of us, we may
disagree on a lot — but we all agree
on certain basics (that are intrinsic to the faith and have been for millennia)... for example, read the Apostles» Creed.
As soon as we start shunning
certain types of people, it is not too long before we find more and more reasons to shun everybody who
disagrees with us
on almost anything.
Because we
disagree on the proper method of baptism, the role of women in the church or the proper interpretation of a
certain Biblical passage does not make one of us correct and the other a «false teacher».
Because this authority is predicated
on the need to achieve
certain specifiable ends that some people may not wish to promote, and because often reasonable people can
disagree about how human activities should be coordinated to attain those ends, we get queasy about enforcing this kind of authority by law.
Michael Vick
on disagreeing with his brother's bounty
on Cooper: «My brother has to not show a
certain level of ignorance himself.»
«to be fair it would be harsh for wenger to force ospina to spend another year
on the arsenal bench» i completely
disagree with you we are talking about professional players with contracts to honour, if wenger decides to keep ospina he would have to bite the bullet and give his best to compete with cech you never what could happen the season is long and there are many games to be played and with our luck we have to expect some injuries, also wenger is already guilty of being too loyal towards
certain players it, s about time he shows his ruthless streak!do you agree??
I can't be
certain, but would hazard a guess that if at 5.45 pm
on Sunday 24th May 2009 you'd turned to me and cheerfully opined that relegation from the top flight should be welcomed as just the tonic my beloved Newcastle Utd needed, I'd have been inclined to
disagree, possibly violently.
It might work for some, but it doesn't work for us; and while I
disagree with the way it's viewed in
certain circles, I'm not about to throw caution to the wind and whoop arse
on my kid and end up in jail.
It's ok for your partner to
disagree with you
on certain aspects of parenting, and it's fine for you to parent differently sometimes.
Before you again spam my inbox with 50 + comments arguing about how you
disagree about the majority position of
certain subcultures
on weakly defined political axis» I rewrote that section to be less «controversial».
Essentially, their misgivings are two-fold: they suspect potential campaign finance violations and they
disagree with
certain fundraising practices
on ethical grounds.
It's a very typical reality in government that people may share
certain goals and still might
disagree on how to get there,» said Mayor de Blasio.
On this I am
certain we'll have to agree to
disagree.
I think we'll have to agree to
disagree on 12 %, or a higher / lower rate... Bt compare it to the measly IRRs many US investors seem happy with these days in
certain sectors / assets (as long as they're convinced co's will maintain shareholder payouts, no matter what).
In a liquidation, the cash returned to shareholders could vary greatly depending
on certain assumptions, but I doubt you would
disagree that there is a reasonable probability this return would be below $ 1.25.
Look okay if you personally don't like the controls then that's fine, we can agree to
disagree (though yeah I will grant I'm probably a bit harsh
on Sterling because he gives off a
certain air in his videos that bugs me).
In summary, a strong case can be made that the US emissions reduction commitment for 2025 of 26 % to 28 % clearly fails to pass minimum ethical scrutiny when one considers: (a) the 2007 IPCC report
on which the US likely relied upon to establish a 80 % reduction target by 2050 also called for 25 % to 40 % reduction by developed countries by 2020, and (b) although reasonable people may
disagree with what «equity» means under the UNFCCC, the US commitments can't be reconciled with any reasonable interpretation of what «equity» requires, (c) the United States has expressly acknowledged that its commitments are based upon what can be achieved under existing US law not
on what is required of it as a mater of justice, (d) it is clear that more ambitious US commitments have been blocked by arguments that alleged unacceptable costs to the US economy, arguments which have ignored US responsibilities to those most vulnerable to climate change, and (e) it is virtually
certain that the US commitments can not be construed to be a fair allocation of the remaining carbon budget that is available for the entire world to limit warming to 2 °C.
Or saying this another way, although policy makers may
disagree on what perfect justice requires, they may all strongly agree that
certain positions are unjust.
While I'm sure a number of folks will
disagree with me
on what is spurious vs. substantive, I think it would be useful to outline which parts of the debate I feel are relatively
certain, are somewhat uncertain, and quite uncertain.
Although the calculations of 18 - year rates of GMSL rise based
on the different reconstruction methods
disagree by as much as 2 mm mm yr - 1 before 1950 and
on details of the variability (Figure 3.14), all do indicate 18 - year trends that were significantly higher than the 20th century average at
certain times (1920 — 1950, 1990 — present) and lower at other periods (1910 — 1920, 1955 — 1980), likely related to multidecadal variability.The IPCC AR5 found that it is likely that a sea level rise rate comparable to that since 1993 occurred between 1920 and 1950.
CEI, the organization singled out for Walker's separate subpoena, issued the following statement from president Ken Lassman: «All Americans have the right to support causes they believe in and the CEI subpoena is an abuse of the legal system and an effort to intimidate and silence individuals who
disagree with
certain attorneys general
on the climate debate.
The parties
disagree on his entitlement to
certain further benefits and
on whether Mr. Borowski sustained a catastrophic impairment as a result of the accident.
Although a
certain president might
disagree, the good old NYT is probably the most reputable news source
on the Fitbit Ionic.
To a
certain extent, I agreed and am making a few minor adjustments; however, I
disagreed with his emphasis
on doing what sounds to me like generalizing the areas that should be covered — if we don't give quantifiable, measurable or otherwise clearly valuable aspects to those areas, how does our client really send a stand - out message?
We have both been in denial and I realize this is why he is always negative about
certain things and wanting to withdraw and break up each time we
disagree on something or have an argument.