Big companies have many, and sometimes conflicting, interests, as a spokesperson for Google tried to explain to the environmental blogger Brian Merchant this way: «[W] hile
we disagree on climate change policy, we share an interest with Senator Inhofe in the employees and data center we have in Oklahoma.»
Not exact matches
The Board added: «Scientists and policymakers may
disagree over the scientific conclusions
on climate change and other
policy - relevant topics.
I sent a host of
climate and energy specialists my post on the «America's Climate Choices» reports from the National Academies and the first response comes from Mike Hulme, a professor of climate studies at the University of East Anglia and author of «Why We Disagree About Climate Change» and the recent «Hartwell Paper» on climate
climate and energy specialists my post
on the «America's
Climate Choices» reports from the National Academies and the first response comes from Mike Hulme, a professor of climate studies at the University of East Anglia and author of «Why We Disagree About Climate Change» and the recent «Hartwell Paper» on climate
Climate Choices» reports from the National Academies and the first response comes from Mike Hulme, a professor of
climate studies at the University of East Anglia and author of «Why We Disagree About Climate Change» and the recent «Hartwell Paper» on climate
climate studies at the University of East Anglia and author of «Why We
Disagree About
Climate Change» and the recent «Hartwell Paper» on climate
Climate Change» and the recent «Hartwell Paper»
on climate climate policy.
Mike Hulme, a
climate scientist at the University of East Anglia in England and the author of a book on the struggle over climate policy, «Why We Disagree About Climate Change,» said that big gatherings of world leaders were less likely to bear fruit than splitting the challenge into pieces that are tractable, and focusing directly on addressing those pr
climate scientist at the University of East Anglia in England and the author of a book
on the struggle over
climate policy, «Why We Disagree About Climate Change,» said that big gatherings of world leaders were less likely to bear fruit than splitting the challenge into pieces that are tractable, and focusing directly on addressing those pr
climate policy, «Why We
Disagree About
Climate Change,» said that big gatherings of world leaders were less likely to bear fruit than splitting the challenge into pieces that are tractable, and focusing directly on addressing those pr
Climate Change,» said that big gatherings of world leaders were less likely to bear fruit than splitting the challenge into pieces that are tractable, and focusing directly
on addressing those problems.
I believe the kinds of accusations you (and most
climate change advocates make) make about people who
disagree with your judgment and priorities ensure that reasoned public
policy on long term energy supply will not happen any time soon....
«It's bad enough that
climate alarmists have actively sought to keep those who
disagree with the «dangerous manmade
climate change» thesis from publishing or speaking
on the subject, or having a role in public
policy decisions, it's far worse when they seek to prosecute
climate chaos skeptics,» says Paul Driessen.