Sentences with phrase «disagree on details»

62 Serious study of verbal fillers produced a wealth of scientific data, and while linguists disagree on the details, a consensus emerged in which uh and um are viewed as signals that perform communicative functions.

There are many points of detail where those wishing to preserve the competitive system and those wishing to super-cede it by something different will disagree on the details of such schemes; and it is possible under the name of social insurance to introduce measures which tend to make competition more or less ineffective.

McConnell says it's not a bad thing that pastors disagree on the details of the apocalypse.

I respect you for this, even though we might (I really have no idea right now) disagree on the details.

Yet while previous efforts have disagreed on the details, they have tended to assume a major role for shale.

Not exact matches

Perrotta reportedly encouraged Pruitt's lavish spending on first - class flights, fancy hotels, and 24 - hour security detail — and clashed with EPA employees who disagreed with it, sometimes physically.

Notice how they agree on the moral aspect, but disagree on the «details» aspect.

Sayer's biography has more detail than Wilson's, disagrees with Wilson on some points, is not as readable or as witty and does not attempt to probe Lewis's psyche in the way Wilson does.

We just disagree on some of the details

HOWEVER... it is exceedingly rare that two or more individuals who witnessed the same event would disagree on the fundamentals of that event or completely omit details that would strike any rational person as being too important to leave out.

Even when they disagree with me on the details, they know that I love Jesus and want to follow him, and that's good enough for them.

All agreed that God ultimately governs the course of events; they disagreed on specific details.

Their expertise lies in being able to disagree with each other in great detail on a series of topics that are fundamental to politics and society world - wide.

Our 50 issues remembered, MPs» Olympic memories, why Mumsnet is so powerful, ComRes's Andrew Hawkins on a Scottish referendum, Katy Clark MP and Julia Hartley - Brewer disagree over the standard of our press, the Cuban missile crisis in detail and Keith Simpson's summer reading guide.

He points out many details he supervised, a few he disagreed with, and elaborates on the measures taken in the name of realism.

It will be no surprise to you that I disagree with a lot of your points here and while I didn't expect a debate on this, I'll answer your comments in a bit of detail as I have strong opinions on this type of thing.

However, where we disagree is that the multi-decadal surface temperature trends and anomalies also depend on the details of the observing sites and how these details change over time.

While I disagree on much of the recent critique on your work, I'm still not convinced that it allows for particularly useful conclusions at any level of detail.

John A, say's of me «Such a shame you don't spend any time looking at the evidence to see whether that accepted climate science should have been accepted in the first place» when it's clear I'm here reading stuff I disagree with and discussing it... Then, after more baseless accusation of me unsupported by any evidence bar extrapolation from the details of myself I gave, he goes on to say «I reserve the right to say what I think and justify what I say with evidence that people can check for themselves».

While I may disagree with you on some of the details of radiative energy transport in the atmosphere and the applicability of simple models, I am in general agreement with your views in this post.

I agree that the details of the surface temperature record is not the key issue in any discussion of the actual impact on people's lives or the key issue which has led me to disagree with the IPCC's conclusions.

They then summarize evidence showing disagreement, identify four reasons why scientists disagree about global warming, and then provide a detailed survey of the physical science of global warming based on the authors» previous work.

Neither have you disagreed with the my observation that despite the detailed study of buckets of water, the derivation of the duration, timing and magnitude of the adjustments is not soundly based on rigorous scientific findings but speculation and hypothesis.

Although the calculations of 18 - year rates of GMSL rise based on the different reconstruction methods disagree by as much as 2 mm mm yr - 1 before 1950 and on details of the variability (Figure 3.14), all do indicate 18 - year trends that were significantly higher than the 20th century average at certain times (1920 — 1950, 1990 — present) and lower at other periods (1910 — 1920, 1955 — 1980), likely related to multidecadal variability.The IPCC AR5 found that it is likely that a sea level rise rate comparable to that since 1993 occurred between 1920 and 1950.

When climate scientists themselves keep arguing and disagreeing on this study, that model, that data and math versus this data and this math, including on this «science» forum, it is obvious to me that those less educated and less involved in the details would also be asking some pretty serious questions about notions of credibility and reliability of the science outputs and claims from one day to the next.

The 2/3 DCA panel disagreed, because (1) detailed billing timesheets are not mandatory in seeking fees at the state court level, and (2) the attorney seeking fees on behalf of a client could obtain a waiver of the privilege by the client so that the substantiation can be submitted.

Speaking at the latest Commercial Court Users» Group meeting working group member Ed Crosse, partner at Simmons & Simmons, reported that, while some of the feedback disagreed with the proposals, there had been detailed debate on subjects such as the duty to disclose adverse documents, improving basic disclosure, the need for training in the professions and aspects of technology.

I have to disagree on some of this, as I've seen some resumes with too much detail and it bores the crap out of me.

However, if you disagree on even one small detail within the divorce terms, then a divorce mediator would be helpful in order to sort out those terms in a civil manner.

Legal protection is up to the attorneys (I'm not one)- who notoriously disagree on everything related to Series LLC: from their viability to operational details.