@derp Again great point And your right many of
us disagree on our belief As for if Deliverance thinks I'm going to hell.
They opposed organized religion because the churches and temples held sway over people's loyalties, not because they simply
disagreed on the belief in gods being real.
Not exact matches
You're likely surrounded by people at work,
on your commute, or at home who
disagree with you and your
beliefs.
You and I
disagree on a lot of things, but I've said before and I'll say it again, if someone was going to discriminate against you because of what you believe (unless it was a religious organization that had different
beliefs) I'd stand with you.
The willingness to classify political views which should be respected, such as leaving or staying in the EU, as «extreme», shows the danger of focusing the extremism debate
on beliefs we may find uncomfortable or
disagree with, rather than
on actions that threaten lives.»
Lets all stay home and be trolls
on belief blogs and get all thoughts that are not provable science out of the public discourse, or, we could all allow the free flowing of ideas and
beliefs and when we
disagree, we agree that it is okay that we
disagree.
The fundies believers
on this blog have no tolerance for anyone that
disagrees with their
belief system.
Investigators who cite the amorphous nature of parish
beliefs base their findings
on responses that parishioners give to lists of credal statements (e.g., «Jesus is the Son of God,» with scaled responses ranging from «strongly agree» to «strongly
disagree»).
Though it purports to eliminate discrimination, Senate Bill 1146 results in its own form of discrimination by stigmatizing and coercively punishing religious
beliefs that
disagree on contested matters related to human sexuality.
The ERLC hammered
on the same point, releasing a statement that accused the legislation of «its own form of discrimination by stigmatizing and coercively punishing religious
beliefs that
disagree on contested matters related to human sexuality.»
Unfortunately, their
belief in their own righteousness,
on their own authority, gives them a disdain for those who dare
disagree.
The bible is filled with the advocation of violence against any and all people who
disagree with you based
on religious
belief.
i
disagree... our species will not survive as long as we hang
on to these ridiculous bronze age
beliefs....
uh, oh, i know i'm risking Dude's wrath and
disagree with someone
on the
belief blog.
3)
on the contrary, i readily admit that * within their own system *, others who appeal to the transcendent (though i might adamantly
disagree with their particular contentions) have an objective basis for their
beliefs and / or ethics.
Its not bigotry becasue people
disagree with your lifestyle — get over yourself and quit labeling things incorrectly to try and bolster your position and push your
beliefs on others.
Although scholars of the Revolution have
disagreed on many things, the past fifty years have witnessed strong agreement that one significant aspect of the ideas motivating the American Revolution was the Whig or Country party
beliefs which supported the Glorious Revolution and then resisted the growth of monarchical power in the eighteenth century.
New Testament scholars, I understand,
disagree on just what these heresies were; apparently there is a weight of opinion favoring the
belief that they involved doctrines related to what later came to be known as Gnosticism, an ingenious synthesis between Christianity and various Asian redemption cults that went a long way toward de-emphasizing the kenotic dimension of the Gospel.
And if you think God and Jesus judges the sincerity of one's faith and
belief based
on their clothing, I
disagree.
But to be clear, I
disagree with the content of the declaration and with a bunch of religious idiots trying to impose their silly dark age's
beliefs on the American population.
You sir are an idiot, i will continue to believe so, But at the same time, i will make note, that i did not come
on here to point out how flawed your
beliefs are, it only lead down that road because you took it there, i was pointing out, that it does none of us good to sit here and
disagree and try to disprove one another's
beliefs, you have your own i have mine, i know something to be true, and you somehow believe what you believe, i'm apparently not going to change your mind and you have no shot at disproving my
beliefs so why attack eachothers
beliefs?
Evangelicals love to pass judgement
on anybody who does not agree with their
beliefs and are offended when others openly
disagree with them.
Akufo - Addo began to impose his Inherent Intolerant
beliefs on the party such that today when he says he wants something, no INDEPENDENT MIND should attempt to
disagree with his position.
Minardo based his decision
on his
belief that the plaintiffs didn't have standing, a statement the Assembly members
disagree with.
In a response published
on all the electronic and print media entitled «I have nothing personal against the Government or the President» I answered each of the allegations, showing the role I played in John Mahama's nomination as Vice Presidential candidate and stated that: «Being my true self I
disagree and I have
disagreed with the NDC Government
on matters of constitutional principles,
beliefs, values and policy issues but never
on personal matters.
44 % of people told Populus they thought it was important for a political leader to have strong religious
belief, 53 %
disagreed (for the record, Tony Blair is known to be a practicing Christian who regularly attends church, Michael Howard attends a Liberal Synagogue
on the High Holy feast days — not that it matters anyway, since neither of them will be leader of their respective parties by the time of the next election).
Kahan described a strategy for outreach which allows the audience to acknowledge the scientific consensus
on an issue without having to expressly reject their own personal
beliefs, particularly if they happen to
disagree with the scientific community's stance.
we all have our
beliefs and opinions
on every subject, whether they agree or
disagree, but taking an innocent life is murder (I'm pro choice when it comes to making the decision
on whether or not to have a child) but if it is living in the world why take away what it has grown to know and love for your opinions
on what is right and wrong.
This is a major part of the solid science you will need to know if anyone seeks to
disagree with you when you share this information; this study is really the foundation that triggered the massive emphasis
on low - fat diets and the flawed
belief that cholesterol and animal fats are so pernicious.
Those battles occur precisely because the experts creating the curricula
disagree on the subset and sequence of content to be delivered to students — and they don't have the means to include all possible learning pathways and progressions, so they make choices based
on their pedagogical
beliefs / preferences.
Your statements
on climate science are based
on nothing more than your own personal
beliefs about people you have never met, upon scientific reports you don't understand, and upon personal incredulity that anyone could
disagree with your «consensus».
If you go to The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe, you invariably hear a bunch of caricatures of those who
disagree with conventional wisdom
on science — most of which truly are quacks, but not always — and they pedantically emphasize how these alternative views are «not science»: they have
beliefs that do not have peer - reviewed tests supporting a falsifiable hypothesis.
In the Stephan case, people will
disagree on the verdict based
on their own concept of parenting and strongly held
beliefs but, accepting that the jury was properly instructed
on the law, the finding of guilt would be based
on a finding that in all of the circumstances, objectively viewed, the Stephans» conduct was a marked departure from that of the reasonably prudent parent.
However, a new Geekbench report begs to
disagree with this
belief as the flagship seems to be undergoing tests with the new Android Nougat
on board.
Two of the items probe
beliefs and are coded
on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 «
disagree» to 5 «agree».
Strength of
beliefs about the illness was measured
on patient rated seven point Likert - type scales («totally agree» to «totally
disagree») and frequency of coping behaviours (for example, avoiding exercise)
on five point patient rated scales («never» to «all the time»).