Sentences with phrase «disagree on where»

Of course we are going to disagree on where that picture should be hung up, or which restaurant we should eat at, but focusing on our friendship has allowed us to use conflict to better understand each other and love more effectively.

You just may disagree on where to draw that «His thoughts are not our thoughts» line.

Not exact matches

«Obviously, I disagree [with Trump] on a whole bunch, but Canadians expect me to accomplish two things at the same time, which is emphasize where we disagree and stand up firmly for Canadian interests,» Trudeau told Rolling Stone.

Execs were most excited at the prospect of improving cross-border trade and travel flow to the United States, which they ranked a 6.0 on a 7 - point scale, where 1 means disagree strongly and 7 means the opposite.

In a recent Compas Inc. poll, Canadian CEOs said the crisis in Japan is bad news for new nuclear energy installations in the short term, until safety reviews are completed, and ranked the statement a 5.6 on a 7 - point scale, where 1 means strongly disagree and 7 means strongly agree.

We decided we would concentrate on the areas where we had an affinity and leave the stuff we disagreed on out of the equation.

You seem to have come to a place where you can agree to disagree with them on a personal level, which is very healthy.

What is interesting is doing this work in community, where other people might call you on stuff, or heaven forbid, disagree with you.»

As Muslim we don't need to be kissing asses to make the USA happy but rather we need honestly show them where we disagree with them so can reach an understanding based on respect.

But suffice to say, I have called him more than once to push back on blog posts where I disagreed with his tone and / or content and each time, he has spent the time to fully hear me, has validated my voice, and sought to learn with me.

Before moving on to the inevitable frustrated question, «Well where do they disagree then?»

Neither bothers to say where and why they disagree with Krein and Pappin on economics, something that might help clarify the cultural differences as well.

If you take two people who disagree with each other on a fundamental level, and stick them in a room where they can't see or touch one another, they can only talk, and then give them nothing specific to talk about, there is only one direction that's going to go.

Besides, are you suggesting that we suppress anyone's right to free speech because if you are than you need to move to one of these bass ackward countries where a less than middle school quality production of a total farce can insight people to act as a pack of rabid dogs blaming America for why they live in dirt... We are LUCKY and BLESSED to live in a land where we can smile and walk away from an opinion that we disagree with... that South Park can but Jesus in a boxing ring against Satan and depict Moses as a glowing spinning dreidl... and these nutcases want to burn and pillage because one lunatic makes a childish and stupid play on videotape?

Those are the two extremes, but even in the middle, where most of us here today are, we often disagree on how to dress, whether it is okay to drink alcohol or not, what music, movies and other entertainment is appropriate, whether to run for public office, and on and on and on.

My purpose in commenting is not to debate where we disagree, but to comment on one sentence only.

I have told my children where I stand on the issue but I have also let them know they are free to explore any and all information they are curious about, including religious questions, and are free to disagree with me.

Where we disagree is that conclusion leads me to realize the non-existence of god since the existence of a good omnipotent god that created us in his image is an obvious logical fallacy; you, on the other - hand prefer to take that information and suspend your rational abilities to allow yourself to continue to believe such a paradox.

I disagree with him, however, on the one point where he makes common cause with Pannenberg: namely, that apart from the apocalyptic horizon, the disciples» experiences can only be regarded as subjective hallucinations.

But, in the process, many people in the emerging church wound up saying, «Yes, that's correct — he gets what we're trying to do, he just disagrees with where we land on some issues.»

So while creationist and evolutionist will often agree on the what, we disagree on the how, why, and where, which are often more difficult to test definitively.

The few things we disagreed on were minor compared to all the areas where we did agree.

But it can also be because, although both parties are acting honestly and reasonably, they simply can not agree on how to proceed, and it is physically impossible for both parties to get their way — as when neighbors reasonably disagree about where the property line dividing their holdings falls.

(He has also expressed this view on social media, where he often complains about the bad manners and poor spelling of those with whom he disagrees.)

Dear Adrian, I get where your coming from but I disagree that If a Christian gives a blessing to a non believer it has nill effect when I worked for a short time on a check out in a supermarket I bade them farewell with a blessing, the choice was theirs to receive the gift and open it.

You have just hit the nail on the head and have identified exactly where we disagree.

I also should have placed more emphasis on where I disagreed with Bush ideologically.

«We spend way too much time fixated on the areas we disagree with each other and need to create more moments where we come together as a country.»

He committed himself only to showing that where he disagreed with Aristotle he did so on responsible philosophic grounds.

Can you point me to some articles where Obama has sicc «ed the IRS on ANYONE who disagrees with his agenda?

I disagree I think Sanchez with his goal hunger is best suited on the left where he can cut in on his right foot and score.

We're on the same page quite a bit on things — there's just a few times where you disagree with me because you're wrong.

I don't disagree with your thoughts on the media, but I honestly don't see where else to turn.

Where I disagree with though is on this issue of «Arsenal bias» — I actually think there is an endemic bias against Wenger amongst Gooners, not for him.

I long for the days where we can actually debate and disagree on players and their contribution with hope and passion in our hearts rather than the situation we are in today.

The thing that really bothers me is the thing we've disagreed on in the past and that's imo Wengers apparent lack of Urgency and decisiveness when moving into the transfer window I know that Scheweinsteiger would be a great addition but He is somewhat over the hill in comparison to the others that are being toted about and while I know that we are not the cash Rich Man Poo or Man Sh!tty or Chelski I do know that we are at a point for the first time in ten years where we don't need to replace many players or are being frced to sell the quality ones we have, we are for the first time in a spot where we only need to add two or three players and we are there in terms of being able to compete, Id hate for the financial Exuberance to stop us taking that final stride forward into the competitive team we nearly are IMO spend the money now, get the striker, get the DM and we wont need to look at transfers in a big way again for several seasons and with that in mind Id rather have the likes of Benzema or Lacazetta or even Cavanni than a nearly over the hill Scheweinsteiger.

but nevertheless I still disagree with your premises on PG and his worth and standing in the game... credit should be given where due, money helps but its not the be all.....

Klopp and Pochettino disagreed on penalties, but game was example of where top level football is going

But my main beef was not with starting Walcott per se (I wouldn't have done it, but hey ho), but with keeping him and Coquelin on so long when it was clear what we were doing in attack wasn't working particularly well (that's where Doc and I disagree; he thinks we were dominating and looking dangerous for most of the second half, apparently; that wasn't my impression).

Where I would disagree is the UNICEF drive which I think is really lame (I wrote an article on it myself) and the candy.

Where I disagree with you is in counting things on the level of what you posted as «some» evidence.

Spending time to go through cook books and plan a meal rather than rush about and just use up whats in the fridge it really enjoyable - although my family may disagree, given the headless chicken impressions I do at times and the occasions when they find me photographing dinner on the bedroom floor - because that's where the best light is!

Kennedy: «I'm disappointed with the addition of the 63rd Senate seat, besides adding to the cost of government, it was put in a place that has no impact on western New York and quite frankly has no impact on the population shift in New York state and if there was going to be an additional seat added that despite the fact that I disagree with you that the Constitution was in fact violated and you say that it was not violated — the fact that this additional seat adding to the cost and size of government was added to a place in the Capital Region rather than a place where distinctly the population grew down in New York City I believe was based upon the fact that had an additional district been added in the city where the population shift had come from it would have included that seat being an additional minority seat and that is why it was put up in the Capital Region and rather than in the New York City area.

So, if state and federal law disagree on a matter where the federal government has power to make that law, the federal law wins.

There are plenty of other topics where libertarians disagree with GOP but DNC would not be much of an improvement in practice based on observed history (war on drugs / drug legalization, prostitution legalization, SWAT and aggressive police tactics, censorship etc...)

These were a half - dozen contests where strategists generally disagreed on the shape and trajectory of the race.

However, I must disagree with abelenky slightly — I believe there is one case where using a nuclear weapon on terrorists makes sense: If the objective is to destroy a bioweapon.

I've been covering him in various capacities since I wrote for the SUNY New Paltz Oracle, and I will miss the guy — agree or disagree with him, you know where he stands on things, he's consistent with these stances and doesn't cater to political trends.

On whether he would join Corbyn's shadow cabinet, Leslie said: «My worry is, if I was to serve in the shadow cabinet there would come a moment where something would come up which I would disagree with, and these are my principles, whether it is to do with security or the running of the economy.

When one reporter asks DeSantis for comment on summit guest Dinesh D'Souza, who mocked on Twitter students from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School where 17 people were murdered during a February mass shooting, the Congressman responds: «I disagree with what [D'Souza] tweeted but I would not disinvite him.»