Sentences with phrase «disagree with him on global»

CT frequently covers Pope Francis, including examining the recent release of his encyclical, how many of his fans disagree with him on global warming, and the theology behind his warnings on climate change.

Let me ask you — is there anyone who you disagree with on global warming who has not been seduced by fame, ideology, or closeness to power?

Not exact matches

«As a matter of principle, therefore, we respectfully disagree with the CNIL's assertion of global authority on this issue and we have asked the CNIL to withdraw its formal notice,» wrote Peter Fleischer, Google's global privacy counsel.

He and Gingrich don't disagree on evolution and manmade global warming probably happening, but the ex-governor does have a firmer grasp on what's required to deal with the economic crisis of our time.

As reported by The Mirror, Wenger took the chance in his pre match press conference to disagree with the Dutchman and explain that he loves the busy festive period, insisting that it is one of the things that makes the Premier League such a global commodity, when the leagues around Europe have shut down but everyone is on holiday.

«I am a Democrat and disagree with virtually all of President Trump's policy positions including those on healthcare, LGBTQ rights, civil rights, immigration, global warming, gun control, and tax «reform.

When his turn to question Holdren arrived, Rohrabacher began by requesting permission to submit the names of 100 climate scientists who disagree with the consensus on global warming, including people Rohrabacher described as prominent academics.

Although I dislike (and disagree with) some of the drama that surrounds the food topics that these books address, as a result of reading them I began to educate myself on our food system and eating in a way that feels right to me while keeping science, and local and global issues in mind.

Evidence matched with a sound scientific method and the credibility of them there scientists then leads to agreement and a minority who disagree — that AGREEMENT ON THE EVIDENCE THEN BECAME A GLOBAL CONSENSUS OVER SEVERAL DECADES.

The petition, despite being frequently cited by global warming critics as showing that thousands of scientists disagree with the consensus on global warming, contains almost no people with relevant expertise; and its vetting was so lax that it included fictional signatories such as Star Wars characters and a member of the Spice Girls.

Therefore, if anyone claims to be part of the 97 percent, it means they disagree with the contrarian argument that humans are having a minimal impact on global warming.

What The Science Says: If anyone claims to be part of the 97 %, it means they disagree with the contrarian argument that humans are having a minimal impact on global warming.

And I will disagree with you on which would be more catastrophic, a Younger Dryas type drop in global average temperature of 3 - 5 degrees, or an increase due to anthropogenic causes of 3 - 5 degrees.

To some extent, I actually agree with Dr. Hansen on this point, additional global warming would cause an albedo change - I just disagree that CO2 would have any affect.

«Gore has caused the spread of more pseudo-scientific incompetence on the subject of global warming (I'm sorry — climate change) than any climate scientist could possibly have ever accomplished... No serious climate researcher — including the ones I disagree with — believes global warming can cause colder weather.

If anyone claims to be part of the 97 percent, it means they disagree with the contrarian argument that humans are having a minimal impact on global warming.

Though it's not written down anywhere, it's well known that you can not work in the earth or environmental scientists if you disagree with the consensus on catastrophic global warming.

Yet funny how on this issue millions, however, are so brilliant as to be able to fundamentally disagree with the world's leading climate scientists on a complex multi layered probability and time range global dynamic biologic, ecologic, energy problem).

If you disagree with my statement on global vs North American temperatures, explain why.

He and his coconspirators are so desperate to discredit anyone who disagrees with their alarmist views on man - made global warming that they are willing to lie, steal, and even defraud their own friends and allies in the media.»

As has been the case with other attempts to vilify, intimidate and silence experts who disagree with alarmist views on global warming and climate change, Kaine presented an argument rife with logical fallacies — appeals to emotion, straw men, ridicule, oversimplification and misrepresentation.

Giaever resigned from the American Physical Society when he disagreed with their stance on global warming (which they believe is occurring and is «incontrovertible»).

You can disagree with me all you like on whether or not you think global warming is man made; on how much we should spend to deal with it; on whether mankind is a cancer on the earth or a force for good; on any number of issues.

By this evening, a total of 19 Democrats, led by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, will have taken to the floor of the United States Senate to attack the free speech rights of individual and organizations that disagree with the government dogma on the causes and consequences of global warming.

The release cited Stott stating that «in the UK, it is a media myth that there are only a few scientists who disagree with the view of «global warming» on which the Kyoto Protocol is predicated.»

«Luetkemeyer's legislation would prohibit U.S. contributions to the IPCC, which is nothing more than a group of U.N. bureaucrats that supports man - made claims on global warming that many scientists disagree with... Meanwhile, our very own Environmental Protection Agency recently reported that we are undergoing a period of worldwide cooling.»

Obama talked about clean energy, then started to back into global warming and climate science («I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change....»)

By Michael Bastasch — The science on global warming is settled, so settled that 20 climate scientists are asking President Barack Obama to prosecute people who disagree with them on the science behind man - made global warming.

I disagree with «a massive PR campaign involved in selling it to the public» wrt to global warming but am willing to say massive PR campaigns by many groups (on both sides), admittedly some overlapping and some just «fellow travelers».

Most people who I disagree with on the subject of Global Warming will be right about many subjects.

The memorandum, obtained by NRDC from the White House Council on Environmental Quality under the Freedom of Information Act, shows that ExxonMobil began a secret campaign for Dr. Watson's removal in the first weeks of the Bush administration, and reveals ExxonMobil's intention to replace Watson and other key scientists with contrarians known for disagreeing with the prevailing consensus that man - made pollution is causing global warming.

Even when we disagree with conservative philosophies (there are more than one), we should make that a seperate issue rather than hampering the effort to combat global warming by trying to bury conservatism based on the fact free bias of some conservatives.

Most people who I disagree with on the subject of Global Warming I will agree with on the subject of genocide or the moon landings or the Elvis Presley's CIA hit - squad.

According to Borenstein himself, his own views «start and end with Ross Gelbspan's The Heat Is On,» which condemns scientists who disagree with the theory of man - caused global warming, painting all those who disagree as being biased by pro-industry and conservative groups and businesses.

However, physical models often disagree with observations and amongst themselves on the amount of the intensification, and global distribution of moisture that defines dry and wet regions.

Indeed, in the summary of the report, the British lawmakers explain clearly why they are seeking a fierce crackdown on those who disagree with embattled global - warming theorists.

And, it doesn't take long to find scientists who disagree with the mantra... despite what the IPCC (even some of the authors diagree), Gore, and the media says about the universal agreement on global warming.

An example of an intent to displace established climate science is the incorrect contrarian «basic» fringe claim that variations in solar activity are mostly responsible for recent global warming / climate change; this contrarian claim is demonstrably wrong because it disagrees with the data on solar activity.

The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985) examines the global assessment of a person's quality of life according to his / her chosen criteria using five items rated on a 7 - point Likert scale ranging from «Strongly Disagree» to «Strongly Agree (e.g., «I am satisfied with my life&raquWith Life Scale (SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985) examines the global assessment of a person's quality of life according to his / her chosen criteria using five items rated on a 7 - point Likert scale ranging from «Strongly Disagree» to «Strongly Agree (e.g., «I am satisfied with my life&raquwith my life»).

The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985) examines the global assessment of a person's quality of life using five items rated on a 7 - point Likert scale ranging from «Strongly Disagree» to «Strongly Agree (e.g., «I am satisfied with my life&raquWith Life Scale (SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985) examines the global assessment of a person's quality of life using five items rated on a 7 - point Likert scale ranging from «Strongly Disagree» to «Strongly Agree (e.g., «I am satisfied with my life&raquwith my life»).

Five items (α =.86) assessed global life satisfaction, with statements such as «In most ways my life is close to my ideal» rated on a 5 - point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree).