Sentences with phrase «disagree with him on just»

I'm sorry to say I disagree with you on just about everything else.

But I disagree with you on just running away from the matter.

Not exact matches

Neutral reports on the Trump administration's trade policy tend to include a line advising readers that most economists disagree with just about everything that comes out of the mouths of the president, Ross and Robert Lighthizer, the U.S. trade representative and leader of the American side at the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement.

Well, I don't know if Obama has any tattoos, or skims money off the collection, or told anyone lately that they're evil and going to hell just because they disagreed with them, or has ever cheated on his wife with another woman, or man, so maybe he isn't your typical pastor, is that what you're saying?

Just like others have a right to speak up when the Church holds positions (that the Church wants to impose on non-Catholics) that the others disagree with.

Again, if you disagree with this, prove the only thing that makes gravity stick to a 9.8 constant is god keeping his finger on the button and back it up with evidence, or else you're just making baseless claims and still gettting angry at other people for backing up their claims with hard evidence when you can not.

Second, let me say that, if we go with your second argument, then we could say that we agree that all distinctions are not the ideal, but just disagree on when we should see, want to see, or start to see those distinctions disappear.

I remember disagreeing at times with both of them online (although sometimes also agreeing) I'm no - one and not even in the conversation anymore I don't believe and just spectate allot of what goes on these day's but I wan na own my own misogyny as I continue to try and unpick and leave it behind.

Moldy, So you'd infringe on const itutional rights just because you disagree with our position and can not defend yours?

You can't just assume that there is a Higher Power, and that it's ONLY on your side of things and NEVER disagrees with YOUR personal choices.

Your spiritual experience is valid to me, and most Pagans don't think of other religious traditions as being «wrong»; we just disagree with anyone who thinks they have a stranglehold on the truth.

I was just making an observation on something I disagreed with — you don't have to get nasty about it....

You're seriously flawed in your assessment of me, many would disagree with you but then again you have no clue as to who I am - just a few lines on an anonymous blog... kudos for judging a person based on that and that alone.

You can still dispute and protest things you disagree with, you just can't force your understanding on others.

I agree with him that «Israel's election was not just for a time,» and indeed I do not find much in his letter with which to disagree, other than to insist again on the importance of the Catechism's theology of Christ's saving work.

He basically said that how he understood the Bible was what the Bible clearly teaches because he lets the Bible and the Bible alone inform his theology, and anybody who disagreed with him was just following their own human understanding of the text imposing their own theology on the text of the Bible.

Rachel Held Evans @mrsmetaphor @donmilleris I have no ill - feelings for Don; just disagreed with him on this one.

But, in the process, many people in the emerging church wound up saying, «Yes, that's correct — he gets what we're trying to do, he just disagrees with where we land on some issues.»

And since most people who claim there is a «god's law» disagree on what it is, I say we continue to go with man's law just like we do when we go with man's law and call it «god's law.»

Sanders defended his decision, saying, «You just can't exclude people who disagree with us on one issue.»

I just took a a few days out to look up those 55 verses on Repent, Repented and Repentance and I wholeheartedly disagree with your statement, as follows:

«I think you just can't exclude people who disagree with us on one issue,» said Sanders back then.

I put that list in there just to show the hypocrisy of a person labeling someone else that disagrees with their stance on gay marriage as a hate filled bigot.

Again you have agreed with me that there should be a line, we just disagree on it's placement.

Sometimes it's just because we disagree with the the other person on a number of issues.

So even though Man City, Liverpool and Man United are all doing just as badly as Arsenal and a lot worse if you consider how much more money they have spent, it seems to be Wenger who is always in the press, on the verge of being sacked and with players and staff supposedly disagreeing with every decision the Prof makes.

Urlacher was best utilized in that defense of Lovie's and I totally disagree that Urlacher is the Urlacher you know if he just played with two giants on the line.

We're on the same page quite a bit on things — there's just a few times where you disagree with me because you're wrong.

Nahh I got ta disagree with that he again is missing some key factor that I cant put my finger on he's just a millimetres short but it may as well be a mile.

So I am sure that many of you Gooners out there will disagree wildly with my theory, but here goes anyway because I truly believe that there is just one thing that the Gunners need in order to mount a credible and sustained assault on the Premier League title in the season to come and it is better luck on the injury front.

Coquelin is such a lucky guy, with just months left on his contract, on the verge of becoming free has now become an integral part of this team and has even been applauded by everyone within and outside the club, that's amazing.If he continues like this and he gets more chances like Ramsey gets he will no doubt be the best in the league.someone said Matic is good offensively, I disagree with that, watch him more closely I will even go as far as saying le coq is a more mobile and a better passer than him.let's appreciate our players too.he is jus got his chance remember.while the likes of Kondogbia, Matic has been doing it for long, give him more chance and he will be the best

@dboy Just like you dudes bully people on this forum who disagree with your train of thought... Shocking...

On a personal note don't be so insulting in future as you may disagree with me and that's your right but my fellow goner opinions are like Ar $ eholes mate everyone has one, there's no need to be derisory or to question my loyalty to the club I've supported since childhood just because you don't like what I think.

look Budd i can go through the accounts with you but no point because i have done so many times on this site, i have a working understanding about accounts and yes i also get my figures from annual returns, lets just agree to disagree,

I wasn't trying to disagree with your post at all (it's pretty funny), just making the point that it's the same as it always is for us Steeler fans, and the results are pretty damn good on the whole.

i disagree the last thing LE COQ needs is a rest he just needs more playing time to get his form back or to stop playing with the brakes on, same thing with sanchez i know wenger tried to be careful with him but his 2 months break might have disrupted his rythim..

I don't disagree that some of the settled players could do with a scare, selling some players could do the other players wonders, I just hope we don't get rid of too many in 1 transfer window and leave our team acting like a bunch of strangers on the field.

i would have to disagree there as it is a board of directors with 6 members as far as i know, and they all have an equal vote on club matters, otherwise stan might as well liquidate the board as is and just make all the decisions himself that would be easier for him.

... i believe the kind of investment that arsenal puts on the team is not proportional to the profit thats gained by the club and thats why you will hear year in year out how our returns eclipsed all the other teams but when it comes to investing in the team that brings these profits, its the other way round... what is the use of having money just laying in the bank idle while we can make better use of it by investing well on it???... i honestly don't believe that we will lift another major trophy with mr arsene as our manager... i just don't see it and if you disagree then care to tell me how

Again Endzone (sorry to somewhat pick on you dude, but I'm just trying to respectfully disagree) responded with this...

I disagree with u ryan the playwrs we got from southampton hve been so inconsistant and u then you say origi ings etc were bought at a steal and will be worth more in time to come so u agree with fsg policy buy potential and once they become better players sell them for a profit sorry but thats my opinion we need to hold on to the better players than compliment them with other great players fsg have turned liverpool into a selling club to fill there bck pockets this was never the liverpool way and now because of this fsg policy is the reason were mid table klopp needs to be given the funds he needs to change things only then can we judge him i just hope he is given the chance before he decides to walk YNWA

It would be difficult to disagree with the manager on that one but the fact is that it has been a problem all season, just that we were punished for that sloppiness by a clinical City side on this occasion.

United midfielder Ander Herrera disagrees with this dichotomy, and just a few days ago voiced his opinion on this.

We're just disagreeing on timing and when there's no credible research to tell me otherwise, I choose to help them learn, with love and patience, from the beginning.

I don't disagree, however, with another point Jane makes on both the blog and in the audio interview, which is that serving children subpar food can result in costs on the back end, and she's not just talking about healthcare costs but the higher costs of educating a child who can't concentrate or pay attention.

The video's sentiments have resonated with mothers; on BabyCenter.com, one poster, hugs4Jack, called the clip «hilarious» and said she'd been called «barbaric and just plain mean for having my son circumsized, lazy and selfish for «giving up» on breast feeding and for buying jarred baby food instead of making my own, abusive for feeding my kid McDonald's, flamed for vaccinating my child against the flu, the list goes on... I don't know why we can't all just agree to disagree.

I just disagree with him that the reason we lost the last election was because of a higher top rate of tax on those earning over # 150,000.

Disagree with them on the issues, but the nonsense the left spouts about FOX is just that; nonsense.

Gavin Devine's exhortation on the blog to «cut the waffle on lobbying and get serious» attracted guarded approval from Mark Adams, who wrote: «I thought I would have to disagree with Gavin... However as I read further into the article, it seems Gavin is just being diplomatic — by the end, he clearly thinks the government's proposals are almost as flawed as I do!

Now he's driving people out on ideological grounds just because they disagree with him.»