But Mari, Church history of replete with well - known Church leaders (even Church Fathers) tearing down those with whom they disagree if
they disagree with orthodoxy.
Read the «scientists who
disagree with the orthodoxy,» page for other ideas about global warming and climate change.
Not exact matches
Some of us
disagree with the sexual ethics of orthodox Jews, Christians, and Muslims giving rise to this legislation, but we are unified in our resistance to the government setting up its own system of
orthodoxy.
Whenever it
disagrees with current progressive
orthodoxy.
With the older
orthodoxy it is possible to
disagree, as in having an argument.
Well, it's clearly not true that there is the freedom to
disagree with climate
orthodoxy — as we point out in a previous post on this topic.
It's not easy to «take the IPCC back» — or many other institutions — because these institutions have literally grown themselves by attracting lots of people who supported the official
orthodoxy, while rejecting the people who
disagreed with some of the
orthodoxy.
He describes as «deplorable» the way climate change has become a gospel truth that you deny or mock at your peril, «where one side [has] the
orthodoxy on its side and delegitimises the views of those who
disagree, rather than engaging
with them intellectually and showing them why they are wrong».
[In the comments, Bruce McCullough points me to a blog that
disagrees with the prevailing
orthodoxy, Climate Audit.]
In this case, the pressure and threats are aimed at an scientist who
disagrees with political
orthodoxy.
From being accused of trying to «discredit anyone who
disagrees with [our]
orthodoxy» simply for reporting that one