We strongly
disagree with the reasoning in his opinion and will examine and vigorously pursue all legal options available to ensure our over half a million customers in New York State can continue to play the fantasy sports games they love.»
«We strongly
disagree with the reasoning in his opinion and will examine and vigorously pursue all legal options available to ensure our over half a million customers in New York state can continue to play the fantasy sports games they love.»
In an email to Business Insider this afternoon, Hanauer said that he accepts TED's right not to post his presentation, but that
he disagrees with their reasoning:
Although I'm more left - oriented,
I disagree with their reasoning.
He told Myjoyonline.com he was in court when the ruling on Oppong Kyekyeku's case was given and he respectfully
disagrees with the reasoning of the court in dismissing the case.
Generally I don't
disagree with your reasoning.
I personally like the look of the Catahoula with a tail, but
I disagree with the reasoning and mis - information stated for faulting a bob - tailed Catahoula.
If you know of a better deal, or
disagree with our reasoning please contact us and if appropriate changes will be made.
That I might
disagree with her reasoning or logic does not mean that I make negative judgements of her integrity.
You may
disagree with my reasoning, but I really can't do more than I've already done.
I totally
disagree with your reasoning behind your family «spending less» after you will die.
If you have received a non-renewal notice and
disagree with their reasoning, give your insurer a call.
I'd have to
disagree with reason # 2.
This is a risky move that can work against you if a hiring manger
disagrees with your reasoning.
Not exact matches
Interestingly, the court that overturned City Council's decision to fire her didn't
disagree with Council's
reasons — it merely
disagreed with the process that was followed.
And given Navarro's past behavior, there's good
reason to think he could use his power as a gatekeeper to shut out anyone who
disagrees with him.
I'm a Christian, and it really ticks me off when I hear someone trying to use Jesus as a
reason why he would
disagree with something that someone else believes is wrong.
Published a decade ago to considerable acclaim for all the wrong
reasons, this book, in its revised edition, continues to be the perfect manual for rearing politically correct bigots who dismiss as bigots all
with whom they
disagree.
The ruling
disagreed with the plaintiffs» argument that a woman therefore had a right to have an abortion any time and for any
reason.
Civility is always in short supply and one can readily agree that «we need to keep in mind the common humanity that we share
with those
with whom we
disagree,» and that «we should never lose faith in the power of
reason,» and that the Church should never be used «as a partisan political tool.»
if you listened to evolution and school and
disagreed with it on purely religious
reasons, that's not good enough to then try and get it out of the classroom.
How do you
reason with someone, saying you want to agree - to -
disagree and live in harmony together and they want to kill you and do not think you even have the right to exist?
BC: I love how you, like so many others who take your line of
reasoning, always have to get one shot below the belt about eternal consequences for
disagreeing with you... I mean
with God.
If you want to
disagree with the exegetical evidence, fine, but at least give me
reasons why you
disagree with my findings.
But I ultimately
disagree with my sincere, well - meaning friends who say this forum shouldn't exist to begin
with, for this
reason: While a blog comments section is a piss - poor place for this conversation to be happening, it's happening here because other options have been attempted and found wanting.
This is one of the
reasons why years ago I joined prominent religious leaders, including some I strongly
disagree with, in signing a document expressing convictions concerning religious liberty.
In that case, I will ardently
disagree with you, and I will invariably enlighten you as to all the
reasons why you're wrong.
In Matthew 19, the Pharisees asked Him about divorce, hoping to trap Him into
disagreeing with Moses and therefore finding
reason for condemning Him.
This formulation makes sense, but I find myself compelled by Scripture,
reason and experience to
disagree with much of what constitutes traditional doctrine.
If the issue is
with my absolute use of «God
disagrees...», then I'd appeal to
reason and say that this is a Christian blog; for a Christian to proclaim what God does and doesn't approve of should not only be accepted but expected.
Ok, lets see if I can walk through your thought process: [laughing] has no capacity to formulate rational response... I think that's code for [laughing
disagrees with me, I make a good point, he gives me
reasons why I'm (right turn clyde) am wrong.
I apprecite you sharing your
reasons for your vote but I totally
disagree with your rationale.
One might have expected that a course in moral
reasoning based on the teachings of Jesus would include an introduction to the idea of natural law and some discussion of traditional moral teachings, but Cox
disagrees with many of the basic tenets of orthodox Christianity and doubts our ability to identify unchanging and absolute truth in religion or morality.
You may
disagree with the premises of religion as much as you want, buddy, but the
reasoning and conclusion leading to religious doctrine, especially catholic doctrine, are among the best works in logic in the history of mankind, made by men a lot more skilled in it than most who live today, I dare say.
James, You responded to Caryn
with these words: «Although you and I might
disagree quite a bit about a few things, I love the way you simply laid out your
reasons for the perspective you have.
Now, if we accept «being opposed to war for any
reason» as a working definition, I would say, I do agree
with some of your points in your discussion
with MarkR, but
disagree with much of your basic premises.
did you have the «Devils hand» cause it seems to be more than you just
disagreed with the teachings, doesn't make sense that you would keep mentioning it if it was just that
reason.
And yet, for some
reason, we are tip - toeing around saying what is true: That this religion is one that does not tolerate ANYONE speaking ill or
disagreeing with it.
The author finds himself compelled by Scripture,
reason and experience to
disagree with much of what constitutes traditional doctrine.
Of course, the fact that this all makes perfect sense is probably the very
reason that you hyper - religious fundamentalists
disagree with every word I just typed.
As soon as we start shunning certain types of people, it is not too long before we find more and more
reasons to shun everybody who
disagrees with us on almost anything.
Faith can not stand up to any form of
reason, I
disagree with that.
That article was the one titled «CS Lewis on gay marriage» which is about whether or not those who
disagree with gay marriage for religious
reasons should appose it on a legislative level.
I
disagree with Voice of
Reason, To me, the cross is still very much a Christian symbol, as Christmas is a Christian holiday.
NathanL — «I'd sit on my psychologist's chair and hazard a guess that the REAL
reason he reacted so emotionally to my post was that he
disagreed with WHAT I was saying, not
with HOW I was saying it.»
But the
reason why I
disagree with you — and the
reason why others will
disagree with you here — is that you've simply replaced one extreme for another.
next, in order to make identification easier, these subhumans should be required to wear an identification badge on their clothing, say a pink triangle... If society is going to feed these animals they should be put to productive work in their compounds, a cheerful slogan would help to keep up their morale... say» work will make you free»... Finally I
disagree with the good pastor regarding the time it would take for this subculture to die out... God gave us brains for a
reason... I believe there exists a chemical, zyklon b or some such that would be helpful in this regard...
Thanks, Jeremy — I
disagree with your first proposition, Why Water Baptism Can Be Practiced Today, for precisely the
reason you gave in your rebuttal.
awandering scott, Unfortunately for you you have presented not one
reason to doubt Evolution, and 99.9 % of all the scientists on the planet
disagree with you.
Honestly, I have no
reason to doubt that President Obama sincerely embraces Christianity, although I
disagree with him on key issues within the faith and politics, issues that I think are reflected in doubt and a hesitance to accept his claim amongst evangelicals.