Sentences with phrase «disagree with their reasoning»

We strongly disagree with the reasoning in his opinion and will examine and vigorously pursue all legal options available to ensure our over half a million customers in New York State can continue to play the fantasy sports games they love.»
«We strongly disagree with the reasoning in his opinion and will examine and vigorously pursue all legal options available to ensure our over half a million customers in New York state can continue to play the fantasy sports games they love.»
In an email to Business Insider this afternoon, Hanauer said that he accepts TED's right not to post his presentation, but that he disagrees with their reasoning:
Although I'm more left - oriented, I disagree with their reasoning.
He told Myjoyonline.com he was in court when the ruling on Oppong Kyekyeku's case was given and he respectfully disagrees with the reasoning of the court in dismissing the case.
Generally I don't disagree with your reasoning.
I personally like the look of the Catahoula with a tail, but I disagree with the reasoning and mis - information stated for faulting a bob - tailed Catahoula.
If you know of a better deal, or disagree with our reasoning please contact us and if appropriate changes will be made.
That I might disagree with her reasoning or logic does not mean that I make negative judgements of her integrity.
You may disagree with my reasoning, but I really can't do more than I've already done.
I totally disagree with your reasoning behind your family «spending less» after you will die.
If you have received a non-renewal notice and disagree with their reasoning, give your insurer a call.
I'd have to disagree with reason # 2.
This is a risky move that can work against you if a hiring manger disagrees with your reasoning.

Not exact matches

Interestingly, the court that overturned City Council's decision to fire her didn't disagree with Council's reasons — it merely disagreed with the process that was followed.
And given Navarro's past behavior, there's good reason to think he could use his power as a gatekeeper to shut out anyone who disagrees with him.
I'm a Christian, and it really ticks me off when I hear someone trying to use Jesus as a reason why he would disagree with something that someone else believes is wrong.
Published a decade ago to considerable acclaim for all the wrong reasons, this book, in its revised edition, continues to be the perfect manual for rearing politically correct bigots who dismiss as bigots all with whom they disagree.
The ruling disagreed with the plaintiffs» argument that a woman therefore had a right to have an abortion any time and for any reason.
Civility is always in short supply and one can readily agree that «we need to keep in mind the common humanity that we share with those with whom we disagree,» and that «we should never lose faith in the power of reason,» and that the Church should never be used «as a partisan political tool.»
if you listened to evolution and school and disagreed with it on purely religious reasons, that's not good enough to then try and get it out of the classroom.
How do you reason with someone, saying you want to agree - to - disagree and live in harmony together and they want to kill you and do not think you even have the right to exist?
BC: I love how you, like so many others who take your line of reasoning, always have to get one shot below the belt about eternal consequences for disagreeing with you... I mean with God.
If you want to disagree with the exegetical evidence, fine, but at least give me reasons why you disagree with my findings.
But I ultimately disagree with my sincere, well - meaning friends who say this forum shouldn't exist to begin with, for this reason: While a blog comments section is a piss - poor place for this conversation to be happening, it's happening here because other options have been attempted and found wanting.
This is one of the reasons why years ago I joined prominent religious leaders, including some I strongly disagree with, in signing a document expressing convictions concerning religious liberty.
In that case, I will ardently disagree with you, and I will invariably enlighten you as to all the reasons why you're wrong.
In Matthew 19, the Pharisees asked Him about divorce, hoping to trap Him into disagreeing with Moses and therefore finding reason for condemning Him.
This formulation makes sense, but I find myself compelled by Scripture, reason and experience to disagree with much of what constitutes traditional doctrine.
If the issue is with my absolute use of «God disagrees...», then I'd appeal to reason and say that this is a Christian blog; for a Christian to proclaim what God does and doesn't approve of should not only be accepted but expected.
Ok, lets see if I can walk through your thought process: [laughing] has no capacity to formulate rational response... I think that's code for [laughing disagrees with me, I make a good point, he gives me reasons why I'm (right turn clyde) am wrong.
I apprecite you sharing your reasons for your vote but I totally disagree with your rationale.
One might have expected that a course in moral reasoning based on the teachings of Jesus would include an introduction to the idea of natural law and some discussion of traditional moral teachings, but Cox disagrees with many of the basic tenets of orthodox Christianity and doubts our ability to identify unchanging and absolute truth in religion or morality.
You may disagree with the premises of religion as much as you want, buddy, but the reasoning and conclusion leading to religious doctrine, especially catholic doctrine, are among the best works in logic in the history of mankind, made by men a lot more skilled in it than most who live today, I dare say.
James, You responded to Caryn with these words: «Although you and I might disagree quite a bit about a few things, I love the way you simply laid out your reasons for the perspective you have.
Now, if we accept «being opposed to war for any reason» as a working definition, I would say, I do agree with some of your points in your discussion with MarkR, but disagree with much of your basic premises.
did you have the «Devils hand» cause it seems to be more than you just disagreed with the teachings, doesn't make sense that you would keep mentioning it if it was just that reason.
And yet, for some reason, we are tip - toeing around saying what is true: That this religion is one that does not tolerate ANYONE speaking ill or disagreeing with it.
The author finds himself compelled by Scripture, reason and experience to disagree with much of what constitutes traditional doctrine.
Of course, the fact that this all makes perfect sense is probably the very reason that you hyper - religious fundamentalists disagree with every word I just typed.
As soon as we start shunning certain types of people, it is not too long before we find more and more reasons to shun everybody who disagrees with us on almost anything.
Faith can not stand up to any form of reason, I disagree with that.
That article was the one titled «CS Lewis on gay marriage» which is about whether or not those who disagree with gay marriage for religious reasons should appose it on a legislative level.
I disagree with Voice of Reason, To me, the cross is still very much a Christian symbol, as Christmas is a Christian holiday.
NathanL — «I'd sit on my psychologist's chair and hazard a guess that the REAL reason he reacted so emotionally to my post was that he disagreed with WHAT I was saying, not with HOW I was saying it.»
But the reason why I disagree with you — and the reason why others will disagree with you here — is that you've simply replaced one extreme for another.
next, in order to make identification easier, these subhumans should be required to wear an identification badge on their clothing, say a pink triangle... If society is going to feed these animals they should be put to productive work in their compounds, a cheerful slogan would help to keep up their morale... say» work will make you free»... Finally I disagree with the good pastor regarding the time it would take for this subculture to die out... God gave us brains for a reason... I believe there exists a chemical, zyklon b or some such that would be helpful in this regard...
Thanks, Jeremy — I disagree with your first proposition, Why Water Baptism Can Be Practiced Today, for precisely the reason you gave in your rebuttal.
awandering scott, Unfortunately for you you have presented not one reason to doubt Evolution, and 99.9 % of all the scientists on the planet disagree with you.
Honestly, I have no reason to doubt that President Obama sincerely embraces Christianity, although I disagree with him on key issues within the faith and politics, issues that I think are reflected in doubt and a hesitance to accept his claim amongst evangelicals.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z