Sentences with phrase «disagreed about climate change»

Falwell, you recall, Met Candidate joh McKain earlier in the year in a kind of kiss and make up session in which he said he as impressed but they still disagreed about climate change.

Mike Hulme is the author of the excellent Why We Disagree About Climate Change, which was one of The Economist «s four science and technology books of the year in 2009.

The packages contain a book titled «Why Scientists Disagree about Climate Change» and a related DVD; both dispute the scientific consensus that climate change is a crisis.»

I sent a host of climate and energy specialists my post on the «America's Climate Choices» reports from the National Academies and the first response comes from Mike Hulme, a professor of climate studies at the University of East Anglia and author of «Why We Disagree About Climate Change» and the recent «Hartwell Paper» on climate policy.

(This is a point long made by Mike Hulme of the University of East Anglia, and is a central theme in his book, «Why We Disagree About Climate Change.»)

People disagree about climate change; it is one of a cluster of science & policy issues that polarize citizens along cultural / political lines.

Mike Hulme, a climate scientist at the University of East Anglia in England and the author of a book on the struggle over climate policy, «Why We Disagree About Climate Change,» said that big gatherings of world leaders were less likely to bear fruit than splitting the challenge into pieces that are tractable, and focusing directly on addressing those problems.

(I also encourage you to read the review in the journal Nature Climate Change by Mike Hulme, a professor of climate at the University of East Anglia and the author of «Why We Disagree about Climate Change.»)

I vote, among others, for Mike Hulme, the climate scientist who wrote «Why We Disagree About Climate Change,» and Spencer Weart, the physicist and historian who wrote «The Discovery of Global Warming.»

Mike Hulme provides a fascinating analysis of why we disagree about climate change.

I now encourage you to move beyond the assumption that scientists disagree about climate change.

In another heated week on Years of Living Dangerously, The Vampire Diaries star Ian Somerhalder sat down with an evangelical Christian father and daughter who fundamentally disagree about climate change while 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl explored Arctic oil and gas development amidst ice melts and rising seas.

-- Dr. Mike Hulme, Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity, 2009, p. 341

We need to ask not what we can do for climate change, but to ask what climate change can do for us,» writes Hulme in a book of his titled «Why We Disagree About Climate Change.

But, as he argues in his thoughtful book, «Why we disagree about climate change ``, there are actually a wide range of different views on climate change (man - made and natural), and it is foolish to try and simplify these views into a one - size - fits - all «scientific consensus».

(28 April 2009) Mike Hulme discusses his new book «Why we disagree about climate change» on the BBC Radio 4 Today Programme

Synopsis of Why we disagree about climate change... Climate change is not a problem waiting for a solution.

On p. 233 of Why We disagree About Climate Change, in Box 7.1, I make the statement «Risbey goes on to accuse those who do not adopt such urgent language in their descriptions of the science as failing in their civic duty in inform the public, a «scientific reticence» which falls short of the standards of impartial communication».

(September) Review by Tony Allan published in People and Science (17 July) Review by Joseph Bast at American Thinker (16 July) Review by Max Boykoff published by Nature Reports Climate Change (11 July) Blogged by Roger Pielke jr at his personal blog (20 June) Review on celsias website Why we disagree about climate change (29 May)-LSB-...]

(16 July) On p. 233 of Why We disagree About Climate Change, in Box 7.1, I make the statement «Risbey goes on to accuse those who do not adopt such urgent language in their descriptions of the science as failing in their civic duty in inform the public, a «scientific reticence» which falls short of the -LSB-...]

Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity was been published by Cambridge University Press in April 2009, rrp.

(2 October 2009) Andy Revkin of the New York Times has selected for the October edition of Nature Reports Climate Change my book Why We Disagree About Climate Change as his «must - read» book for understanding the upcoming COP15 at Copenhagen in December.

His recent book; «why we disagree about climate change» can be found here;

In another heated week on Years of Living Dangerously, The Vampire Diaries star Ian Somerhalder sat down with an evangelical Christian father and daughter who fundamentally disagree about climate change while 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl exp

In which The Vampire Diaries star Ian Somerhalder sits down with an Evangelical Christian father and daughter who fundamentally disagree about climate change while 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl explores Arctic oil and gas development amidst ice melts and rising seas in Greenland.

Scientists actually disagree about climate change... This is an important statement in and of itself that most of the public don't bother to hear nor understand.

In his new book, Why We Disagree About Climate Change, he explores how the issue of climate change has come to be such a dominant issue in modern politics.

Mike Hulme, one of the high priests of post-normal science, has explained this new religion in his book Why We Disagree About Climate Change and in various articles he has written and interviews he has given.

Mike Hulme explored the connection between culture and climate in his book Why We Disagree About Climate Change.

He uses different standpoints from science, economics, faith, psychology, communication, sociology, politics and development to explain why we disagree about climate change.

Through the twin lenses of scientific scrutiny and rhetorical analysis, Mike Hulme helps us to see just why we disagree about climate change and what we can do about it.

Not exact matches

The researchers note that while it's accurate that agreement isn't unanimous, only about 3 percent of climate scientists disagree about the causes of climate change.

Famously, Stern and Nordhaus really disagree on what should be done about climate change.

And branding people who disagree with you about vaccines, climate change, or genetically modified organisms (GMOs) as the enemy may be unwittingly fueling the conflicts.

Read and disagreed with your review of «Centrist» messaging Andrew and am now replying to your interesting and insightful shared dialogue with Dave about framing the climate change debate:

Read the «scientists who disagree with the orthodoxy,» page for other ideas about global warming and climate change.

The headline comment or assertion (in the media, or by the pundit) might be something like «scientist disagrees with climate change» or «100 scientists disagree with IPCC about climate change», or something like that.

I hope we can put to rest an unhelpful debate among those passionate about confronting climate change, or, at the very least, respectfully agree to disagree.

Blair, pardon me if I seemed to be over-reactive, but if you follow the topic of climate change for more than a very short while you'll see that all too often the «argument» of people who disagree with results they don't like is to mount the ultimate personal attack: they try to substitute comments about an author's personal background for substantive comment about the author's work.

I beg to disagree with the basic thesis of this article: that the public are becoming more sceptical about climate change through a failure to understand the science.

Disagreeing that politics is dominated by a green consensus is the Independent «s Andrew Grice, who complains that «nobody is talking about climate change» anymore.

They found that about 92 % of the scientists believed in anthropogenic climate change and about 89 % of respondents disagreed with the statement: «Climate change is independent of CO2 levels&climate change and about 89 % of respondents disagreed with the statement: «Climate change is independent of CO2 levels&Climate change is independent of CO2 levels».

Subjects holding hierarchical and individualistic outlooks, on the one hand, and ones holding egalitarian and communitarian outlooks, click me for a closer look!on the other, significantly disagreed about the state of expert opinion on climate change, nuclear waste disposal, and handgun regulation.

But I disagree with you that «consensus» messaging creates antipathy among those who identify with an «I'm not concerned about climate change» perspective; IMO, to any significant degree, it only serves as an outlet for pre-existing perspectives.

He had begun his film with a preconceived idea about the climate debate, as one divided into two camps — sceptics and deniers — disagreeing about a single proposition: «climate change is happening».

Know when to disengage when people strongly disagree with you about climate change.

He says there is scientific consensus among experts that climate change is occurring, but the nationwide online poll of 2,600 adults asked whether they believe scientists agree or disagree about it.

We did not do a great deal with this analysis, but I think it helps to set the scene for what is going into a sceptical judgment about climate change: in part, it is coming from disagreeing with the NEP scale.

I believe the kinds of accusations you (and most climate change advocates make) make about people who disagree with your judgment and priorities ensure that reasoned public policy on long term energy supply will not happen any time soon....

I very strongly disagree with much you are on record as saying about the issue of anthropogenic climate change (AGW) and, therefore, it gives me great pleasure to congratulate you on your considered response to the (for want of a better word) unfortunate paper from Lewandowsky et al...