During last summer's funding debate, appropriators in turn rejected the breadth of these proposed cuts, though the House and Senate still
disagreed on certain areas including climate research.
To a
certain extent, I agreed and am making a few minor adjustments; however, I
disagreed with his emphasis
on doing what sounds to me like generalizing the
areas that should be covered — if we don't give quantifiable, measurable or otherwise clearly valuable aspects to those
areas, how does our client really send a stand - out message?