if you listened to evolution and school and
disagreed with it on purely religious reasons, that's not good enough to then try and get it out of the classroom.
Not exact matches
You may
disagree with Krugman's analysis, but it's a little disingenuous to try to denigrate and dismiss Thomas Mulcair's economic ideas when they're based
on Nobel prize winning work in economics (the intellectual case, that is; the factual case that this phenomenon is occurring today, in Canada, is
purely a question of whether the appreciation of our currency is based
on the oil and gas boom and whether a high dollar results in lower exports in other sectors, both of which you seem to have admitted are accurate.)
I'm going to have to
disagree with you
on the idea of individual bonds as being «
purely speculative».
Of course, the fact that they
disagree with me must be
purely coincidence — as would be their near categorical association of their assessment of integrity, character, bravery, etc.,
with perspectives
on climate change and political ideology.