Not exact matches
Jesus himself could come down and proclaim that marriage is for everyone, and all
people are equal no matter who they are... and the
religious right would
disagree with what he has to say.
What you are reading is
people who
disagree with your
religious beliefs.
«We support an executive order making clear that
people of
religious conviction will not be pushed aside by the federal government as we seek to serve our neighbors, including those who
disagree with us.»
The bible is filled
with the advocation of violence against any and all
people who
disagree with you based on
religious belief.
An August 2010 poll by the Pew Research Center for the
People & the Press and the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life found that nearly half of Tea Party supporters (46 %) had not heard of or did not have an opinion about «the conservative Christian movement sometimes known as the
religious right»; 42 % said they agree
with the conservative Christian movement and roughly one - in - ten (11 %) said they
disagree (based on registered voters).
I
disagree with many
people's
religious beliefs, but I would never dream of telling them they don't actually believe what they think they believe.
RD.. How path - et - ic to see your hate and fear driving you to death...!?! Man pull your self together and have the courage to face the returns of your deeds... Wars were always there in life whether were
religious or not so stop doing it on your self... Beside learn to wish
people well whether you agree or
disagree with might you succeed in life rather than being a loser... by being a cowered... My posts were meant for the friendly
people I had known for some time, whom I found they were full of compassion and not for black hearted one's like you who hate all God creations...
«A
religious person can read rand's works on economic philosophy and agree
with them because they are 100 % accurate» That is like saying a Christian can admire the entrepreneurialism of a Madam but
disagree with her on the morality of prost itution.
As for the dangers, I think religion in general, and Christianity in particular, is ill served when leaders of the
Religious Right proclaim what Christians as «
people of faith» are going to do if a President or major party
disagrees with them, as if they have been empowered to speak for all Christians or all
people of faith.
I would rather listen to educated
religious people disagree with one another than listen to an uneducated atheist who can't spell.
I expected that some
people would not understand or would
disagree with my argument, but I did not expect the warm and genuinely excited reactions from those whose own experience has led them to see Christ on the other side of the long border between contemporary Catholic and evangelical
religious experiences.
Many of the
people I know who most closely follow Christ's «teachings» are not
religious in the least, yet many of the most «
religious»
people I've known have been the ones to mock, condemn, vilify and abuse those
with whom they
disagree.
The Catholic Church's nuanced teaching on the condition of souls, whether Catholic or Protestant, can help
people be charitable toward those
with whom they may
disagree, but it was never intended to be a license for
religious indifferentism or gentlemanly negotiation of acceptance of some status quo, e.g., «You try to accept the Pope and we'll work on accepting Jesus into our hearts as our personal Lord and Savior.»
However, they
disagreed with the other seven judges that the state's action had not interfered «
with the ability of a
person to act in accordance
with his or her
religious beliefs or practices.»