Sentences with phrase «disagrees with observation»

If their output disagrees with observation, the models, not nature, must be corrected.

Previous calculations have indicated any effect would be too small to account for dark energy, and would produce an acceleration that changes in time in a way that disagrees with observations.

While I do not do anything on the social netwroks at all, I disagree with his observations, that they play little role in book reading and book enjoyment.

And the crescendo: ``... the subject paper... does not follow the scientific methodology of proof, it disagrees with observations, it is based on flawed referenced papers, and it utilizes a flawed science that is unrecognized by most of the world.»

Now I have extensive modelling experience, but I believe more than ever in Feynman's exhortation to throw the model out if it disagrees with observations.

Natural variability makes it difficult to invalidate climate models that make predictions disagree with observations, such as amplification of warming in the upper tropical troposphere.

«It completely disagrees with our observations, not only in the case of the Moon (covered by a very thin atmosphere), but also in the case of the Earth with an atmosphere.»

«Nonetheless, the models are seen to disagree with the observations.

That is, there is no logical procedure or rule that allows you to automagically reject a theory or model when it disagrees with observations.

«In other words,» Michaels and Knappenberger comment, «statisticians would say the models disagree with the observations with «very high confidence»» — exactly the reverse of the IPCC's assessment.

Yet the models are seen to disagree with the observations.

Neither have you disagreed with the my observation that despite the detailed study of buckets of water, the derivation of the duration, timing and magnitude of the adjustments is not soundly based on rigorous scientific findings but speculation and hypothesis.

IF you think that «the» models disagree with observations because of sensitivity then as a scientist the first thing you would do is ACTUALLY CHECK!

However, physical models often disagree with observations and amongst themselves on the amount of the intensification, and global distribution of moisture that defines dry and wet regions.

Of course, it is possible to disagree with these observations.

In dissent, Justice Alito vehemently disagreed with that observation, asserting that the report was «highly relevant» and had been discussed by the respondent university both at the certiorari and the merits stage.

Not exact matches

However, combine this with the irrefutable observation of humanity that would see human evil as universal in its scope, and combine this with the fact that the VAST majority of human beings disagreed with your interpretation of essential human goodness, and the force of the conviction steels itself.

I was just making an observation on something I disagreed with — you don't have to get nasty about it....

Yet the Catholic tradition disagrees with the «isn't derived from observation of the world» point.

Great observations, and nearly impossible to disagree with the article.

I get quite a lot of stick for being critical of referees in Arsenal games, and I'll be the first to admit that my observations are built on bias, so of course there is a good chance that people may disagree with my viewpoints, particularly when their biases lay elsewhere.

Other physicists disagree about whether that observation counts, since the team was not working with a real black hole.

However, I strongly disagree with one of your observations, and while I hope one of your predictions is correct, I have my doubts.

Several field observations and studies disagree with the postulate that pets with GI disease do not tolerate high level of fat (> 40 % of their calories from fat) in their diet.

While there's many subjects that Gary and I disagree on (especially any topic with the initials T, S, and A), I think he's dead on with this particular observation.

is that it make it easy to skip past the notion that some of the people who disagree with you actually do have ideas or observations that are worth consideration.

If you are trying to imply that you disagree with geophysicists who propose theories to explain observations, take it up with them.

And I disagree with both Jason and Roger — neither climate models nor observations provide the best tool for understanding — rather, an understanding of the essential physical components and how they interact and respond is what should provide the greatest understanding.

So, if you (or Mr. Monckton) want to twist the OT around so that Genesis doesn't disagree with scientific observation, or believe in a version of an Abrahamic religion that treats it as poetry and metaphor and not fact, I could care less, as long as you don't try to replace our valid epistemological, religion - neutral truths with the twisted exegetic stuff or metaphoric extrapolations and use it as the basis of political or scientific decisioning or dedicate your work to Jesus or preface your conclusions with Inshallah!

Athur Smith writes «And I disagree with both Jason and Roger — neither climate models nor observations provide the best tool for understanding — rather, an understanding of the essential physical components and how they interact and respond is what should provide the greatest understanding.»

He said, «If it disagrees with experiment [here observation], it is wrong.

I simply strongly disagree with the idea that observations imply this particular probability.

The CERD's observations on mandatory sentencing can not reasonably be described as expecting that the federal government will «march in and try and overturn every individual state criminal law you disagree with».