They are funded almost entirely by government, and they support — at least in public — the thesis of
disastrous anthropogenic global warming (AGW).
(3) What are the barriers to public dissemination of results casting doubt on the theory of
disastrous anthropogenic global warming (AGW)?
It is perhaps no accident that they are most often quoted in the context of outright advocacy for the idea of
disastrous anthropogenic global warming (AGW).
(2) What is the effect on climate science of public advocacy for the message of
disastrous anthropogenic global warming (AGW)?
Not exact matches
-- > a coming Ice Age — >
global warming — >
anthropogenic global warming — > runaway
global warming — > climate change — >
disastrous climate change — > a «
warming hiatus» (currently)-- > irreversible and catastrophic climate changes (the future)
It may then be possible to limit the
disastrous effects of
anthropogenic global warming.»