Sentences with phrase «disastrous consequences of a warming»

Not exact matches

Fossil fuel emissions of 1000 GtC, sometimes associated with a 2 °C global warming target, would be expected to cause large climate change with disastrous consequences.

Cumulative emissions of ~ 1000 GtC, sometimes associated with 2 °C global warming, would spur «slow» feedbacks and eventual warming of 3 - 4 °C with disastrous consequences.

If it's a dataset issue with the rate of warming, it is not so disastrous and the consequences and solutions can be be drastically different.

Consider the possibility that not just millions, but billions face disastrous consequences from the likes of (including but not limited to): Sandy (and other hybrid and out - of - season storms enhanced by the earth's circulatory eccentricities and warmer oceans); the drought in progress; wildfires; floods (just last week, Argentina had 16 inches of rain in 2 hours *); derechos; increased cold and snow in the north as the Arctic melts and cracks up, breaking up the Arctic circulation and sending cold out of what was previously largely a contained system, and losing its own consistent cold, seriously interfering with the Jet Stream, pollution of multiple kinds such as in China, the increase of algae and the like in our oceans as they heat, and food and water shortages.

Hansen's 2013 paper argued that «cumulative emissions of 1000 billion tons, sometimes associated with 2C global warming, would spur «slow» feedbacks and eventual warming of 3 - 4C with disastrous consequences.»

The orthodox organized religion of global warming and its disastrous consequences for our freedom of speech, freedom of mobility and our right to remain outside of the system, needs to be questioned on the foundational basis that the phenomenon is solar - system wide and it is mainly caused by the natural evolution of the sun and not human activity.

We're still heading for global warming of 3 - 4 °C with disastrous consequence for millions of people around the world living on the frontlines of climate change as droughts, storms and floods threaten their homes, their harvests and their livelihoods.

However, the majority of these greenhouse gas reduction targets are still not ambitious enough to align with the global effort to keep warming below 2 °C, the temperature limit scientists say is necessary to prevent some of the most disastrous consequences of climate change.

But the Global Warming doomsayers continue to grab headlines with their International Meetings, Nobel Peace Prize and predictions of disastrous consequences from «CO2forcing.»

«Fossil fuel emissions of 1,000 gigaton, sometimes associated with a 2C global warming target, would be expected to cause large climate change with disastrous consequences.

The limit of 2C of global warming agreed by the world's governments is a «dangerous target», «foolhardy» and will not avoid the most disastrous consequences of climate change, new research from a panel of eminent climate scientists warned on Tuesday.