Probably it was no coincidence that this new readiness of scientists to consider rapid and
disastrous global change spread in the early 1960s.
Not exact matches
«Add to this the
disastrous effects of climate
change, and we are looking at a highly unstable
global system by the middle years of the century unless urgent action is taken now.»
Fossil fuel emissions of 1000 GtC, sometimes associated with a 2 °C
global warming target, would be expected to cause large climate
change with
disastrous consequences.
A slowly dropping rate of increase would still be
disastrous, but encouraging because it would suggest that we have done something real and significant to start moving the needle int the right direction, but sooner or later, the needle has to start moving down or our
global warming troubles will continue to build and the only
change we are creating is the rate at which are troubles will build.
Global Warming: Computer models used by environmentalists predict imminent and
disastrous climate
change.
I understand that the
global warming on its own affects the churning up of nutrients, and the mixing of water — even without any
changes to the THC at all (although a shut - down of the THC or even a slow - down would be absolutely
disastrous for marine life).
The whole crux of the CO2 issue is that it crystallises our fears for the future and provides a pressure point which might force political action if CO2 can be linked to something as potentially
disastrous as a runaway unnatural
change in
global climate.
(3) The supposed
global warming you claim has such
disastrous impact was — real world now, not exaggerated political propaganda — 1/2 of ONE degree
change in temperature in 1998, and is right now, real world, actual numbers remember 0.0 degrees
change over the past 30 years.
The supposed
global warming you claim has such
disastrous impact was — real world now, not exaggerated political propaganda — 1/2 of ONE degree
change in temperature in 1998, and is right now, real world, actual numbers remember 0.0 degrees
change over the past 30 years.
-- > a coming Ice Age — >
global warming — > anthropogenic
global warming — > runaway
global warming — > climate
change — >
disastrous climate
change — > a «warming hiatus» (currently)-- > irreversible and catastrophic climate
changes (the future)
The melting of the Arctic ice will bring about
changes that go way beyond the
disastrous weather events we are seeing (and are clear to anyone looking down here in the South Pacific) but will lead to immediate increases in
global temperatures which will make the large - scale growing of grain crops impossible.
The topics were broad but there was a clear premise ¨
change the system, not the climate ¨, and the outcome of discussion during these days is the Margarita Declaration consisting of 62 points some on specific issues within the climate
change negotiations, as well as other crosscutting issues which delegates at the UNFCCC usually do not take into account such as the impact on education, food sovereignty, the rights of Mother Earth, the adoption of new ways of life unattached to the idea of development and intergenerational exchange as solutions to the rising
global temperatures and its
disastrous effects.
The year ended on high note with 195 nations joining together in establishing the Paris Agreement to limit
global temperature rise to 1.5 - 2 degrees C and prevent the most
disastrous impacts of climate
change.
The suite of climate models that Western academia provide to us have been made de facto fortunetellers depicting what many of us believe to be a failed forecast of
disastrous climate
change calamity caused by industrial man in general and America in particular and I think such
global warming fearmongers, really require a willing suspension of disbelief.»
Perhaps Pope will write to chide Tim Flannery's latest alarmist diatribe, this one blaming
global warming for Australia's
disastrous fires («A deadly reminder that we must tackle climate
change,» Sydney Morning Herald, Feb. 12, 2009).
Thus the United States, more than any other developed country, has been responsible for the
disastrous 30 year delay in formulating a serious
global response to climate
change, while delays make the problem harder and more expensive to solve and increase the likelihood of triggering dangerous climate
change.
In summary, the combined CET and U.S. climate records add to the empirical evidence disproving the hyperbole for CO2 - caused
disastrous global warming and catastrophic climate
change.
Posted in Advocacy, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Biodiversity, CLIMATE SCIENCE, Development and Climate
Change, Disasters and Climate
Change, Ecosystem Functions, Environment, Events, Flood, Forest, Glaciers,
Global Warming, Government Policies, Health and Climate
Change, India, Land, Lessons, Nepal, News, Opinion, Water Comments Off on Working In The Himalayas To Prevent
Disastrous Flooding
Renaming
global warming to a concern about climate
change and adding a few adjectives when that didn't work — like
disastrous and calamitous climate
change — hasn't worked out so well for the
global alarmists.
Climate
changes resulting from
global warming can have
disastrous effects on the livelihood of people in the developing world:
The bottom line is that it's still possible to limit
global temperature rise to 2 °C, thus preventing some of the more
disastrous consequences of climate
change — but it will require ambitious cuts to
global greenhouse gas emissions.
Yet the
disastrous Kyoto story is repeating itself; adherence to Paris has become a totem of
global determination to tackle climate
change while the agreement seems purpose - built to prevent the very economic sophistication on which any low - carbon future depends.»
We're still heading for
global warming of 3 - 4 °C with
disastrous consequence for millions of people around the world living on the frontlines of climate
change as droughts, storms and floods threaten their homes, their harvests and their livelihoods.
National Academy of Sciences (1975): «We do not know what causes... climatic
change» By Kenneth Richard After having switched from warning the masses in the 1970s about imminent human - caused
global cooling to warning the masses in the 1980s about an imminent human - caused
global warming, the late Dr. Stephen Schneider suggested that, to avoid «potentially
disastrous -LSB-...]
However, the majority of these greenhouse gas reduction targets are still not ambitious enough to align with the
global effort to keep warming below 2 °C, the temperature limit scientists say is necessary to prevent some of the most
disastrous consequences of climate
change.
As Archbishop Desmond Tutu argued at the 2009 Copenhagen climate conference, a two - degree
global mean temperature rise might result in Africa's temperature rising as much as 3.5 degrees — a potentially
disastrous change.
The final decision by all countries at COP 17 in Durban recognized that current GHG - reduction pledges are not adequate to keep
global average temperature below 2 degrees C (the limit science says is necessary to prevent climate
change's most
disastrous impacts).
We can see very clearly that when it comes to having an intelligent discussion about
global warming then, climate
change then,
disastrous climate disruption then, «
global weirding,» etc., that it is communication itself that has been the most attacked and then undermined.
With hope waning that we can limit climate
change to an average increase of 2 degrees centigrade,
global warming threatens many species (including our own) with loss of habitat,
disastrous weather events, and evolving illnesses.
Ten
global corporations have committed to greenhouse gas reduction targets consistent with limiting
global warming to less than 2 °C — the threshold that scientists widely agree would help avoid the most
disastrous effects of climate
change (Table 1).
«Fossil fuel emissions of 1,000 gigaton, sometimes associated with a 2C
global warming target, would be expected to cause large climate
change with
disastrous consequences.
The limit of 2C of
global warming agreed by the world's governments is a «dangerous target», «foolhardy» and will not avoid the most
disastrous consequences of climate
change, new research from a panel of eminent climate scientists warned on Tuesday.