In November 2017, the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (the Board) ordered EfficiencyOne (E1) to provide Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) with an indemnity in respect of any liability that NSPI argued could arise under Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) as a result of NSPI
disclosing customer names, e-mail addresses and electricity usage data to EfficiencyOne.
The debate has raged over differing interpretations of «lawful authority», and there are conflicting decisions from the Courts over whether internet service providers can
disclose customer name and address information to the police in response to a request.
Not exact matches
Specifically, Defendants made false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to
disclose that: (i) the Company was engaged in predatory lending practices that saddled subprime borrowers and / or those with poor or limited credit histories with high - interest rate debt that they could not repay; (ii) many of the Company's
customers were using Qudian - provided loans to repay their existing loans, thereby inflating the Company's revenues and active borrower numbers and increasing the likelihood of defaults; (iii) the Company was providing online loans to college students despite a governmental ban on the practice; (iv) the Company was engaged overly aggressive and improper collection practices; (v) the Company had understated the number of its non-performing loans in the Registration Statement and Prospectus; (vi) because of the Company's improper lending, underwriting and collection practices it was subject to a heightened risk of adverse actions by Chinese regulators; (vii) the Company's largest sales platform and strategic partner, Alipay, and Ant Financial, could unilaterally cap the APR for loans provided by Qudian; (viii) the Company had failed to implement necessary safeguards to protect
customer data; (ix) data for nearly one million Company
customers had been leaked for sale to the black market, including
names, addresses, phone numbers, loan information, accounts and, in some cases, passwords to CHIS, the state - backed higher - education qualification verification institution in China, subjecting the Company to undisclosed risks of penalties and financial and reputational harm; and (x) as a result of the foregoing, Qudian's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
· All public officials who personally provide services whether they work individually or as a member or employee of a business or firm, such as lawyers and real estate brokers, and receives compensation from a client /
customer in excess of $ 5,000 must
disclose the
name of the client /
customer, the services rendered, the amount of compensation and whether the services were related to governmental action.
When an agreement was made on the bill, Cuomo described the measure as a «tough and aggressive approach we need» that did things like requiring legislators to «
disclose income from outside employment and the
names of clients or
customers.»
All public officials who receive at least $ 5,000 for representing a client or a
customer must
disclose the client's
name and the actual work performed, and state whether the work was related to government business.
The receiving broker / dealer, usually a general securities firm, carries the account with the
names and addresses of the
customers fully
disclosed.
An account carried by one Futures Commission Merchant (FCM) with another FCM in which the transactions of two or more persons are combined and carried in the
name of the originating FCM rather than of the individual
customers; the opposite of Fully
Disclosed.
Would you employ a consultant who refused to publish accounts, had no verifiable references, could not
name his last successful
customer and refused to
disclose his methods of working?
Attorneys in our Class Action Practice represent «household
name» corporations in defense of consumer and false advertising class actions; Big Four accounting firms and corporate issuers in securities class actions; companies who have been accused of improperly
disclosing customer data; employers alleged to have violated labor and employment laws; and industrial manufacturers in products liability class and mass tort actions, among others.
(Webster is not allowed to
disclose Sayspring's
customers by
name at this time.)