One week ago, the groups urged the FTC to reopen a 2009 investigation of Facebook, arguing that
the disclosure of user data to Cambridge Analytica violated the 2011 order, which barred Facebook from «making misrepresentations about the privacy or security of consumers» personal information.»
Last week the organizations urged the Federal Trade Commission to reopen the 2009 investigation of Facebook, arguing that
the disclosure of user data to Cambridge Analytica violated the consent order, and noting that the order also prohibited Facebook from «making misrepresentations about the privacy or security of consumers» personal information.»
Not exact matches
But Lowe's
disclosure of just how much
data is involved triggered anxiety about the erosion
of user privacy.
The
disclosure that the personal
data of up to 87 million Facebook
users was improperly harvested by the consulting firm Cambridge Analytica has given privacy experts hope that the public will finally listen to them.
Facebook's late Friday
disclosure that a
data analytics company with ties to the Trump campaign improperly obtained — and then failed to destroy — the private
data of 50 million
users is gen
If you are a
user accessing this Site from any region with regulations or laws governing personal
data collection, use and
disclosure, that differ from United States laws / regulations, please note that through your continued use
of this Site, which is governed by U.S. Law, this Privacy Statement, and our Terms
of Use, you are transferring Personal Information to the United States and you consent to that transfer.
Seven companies — Apple, Baidu, Google, Kakao, Samsung, Tencent, and Oath — improved their
disclosure of options
users have to control their information, which includes options to control if and how their
data is collected for targeted advertising (P7)(See company report cards for details.)
By submitting
User Materials to or using the Site, you represent that you have the full legal right to provide the
User Materials, that such
User Materials will not: (a) divulge any protected health information or infringe any intellectual property rights
of any person or entity or any rights
of publicity, personality, or privacy
of any person or entity, including without limitation as a result
of your failure to obtain consent to post personally identifying or otherwise private information about a person or which impersonates another person; (b) violate any law, statute, ordinance, or regulation; (c) be defamatory, libelous or trade libelous, unlawfully threatening, or unlawfully harassing or embarrassing; (d) be obscene, child pornographic, or indecent; (e) violate any community or Internet standard; (f) contain any viruses, Trojan horses, worms, time bombs, cancelbots, or other computer programming routines that damage, detrimentally interfere with, surreptitiously intercept, or expropriate any system,
data or personal information, or that facilitate or enable such or that are intended to do any
of the foregoing; (g) result in product liability, tort, breach
of contract, personal injury, death, or property damage; (h) constitute misappropriation
of any trade secret or know - how; or (i) constitute
disclosure of any confidential information owned by any third party.
The qualitative
data reported in this article were collected as part
of a larger research project which surveyed a national random sample
of users of a large online dating site (N = 349) about relational goals, honesty and self -
disclosure, and perceived success in online dating.
Should The Hotel Erwin inadvertently acquire personal information or any other
data from
users under the age
of 18, The Hotel Erwin will not knowingly provide this
data to any third party for any purpose whatsoever, and any subsequent
disclosure would be due to the fact the
user under 18 used the Site and submitted personal information without solicitation by or permission from The Hotel Erwin.
Although the We - Vibe maker maintains that
users consented to the conduct alleged in the complaint and that it disclosed the collection
of data in its privacy policy, this settlement highlights the importance
of drafting company - and product - specific privacy policy
disclosures as opposed to pro forma policies that use generalized statements.
I fully agree with Michael that true innovation builds on open access to public legal
data to deliver new tools that solve real problems and enable
users to do more (
disclosure: we're proudly part
of the LegalX cohort too).
Customer shall: (a) have sole responsibility for the accuracy, quality, and legality
of all Customer
Data that is transmitted or otherwise provided to IEC and the means by which Customer acquired Customer
Data; (b) ensure that all
users receive any required disclosures and appropriate training concerning the use of the Services; (c) use commercially reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized access to, or use of, the Services, and notify IEC promptly of any such unauthorized access or use; (d) promptly inform IEC when the number of Active Users increases; and (e) use the Services (s) only in accordance with this Agreement, the Documentation and any applicable
users receive any required
disclosures and appropriate training concerning the use
of the Services; (c) use commercially reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized access to, or use
of, the Services, and notify IEC promptly
of any such unauthorized access or use; (d) promptly inform IEC when the number
of Active
Users increases; and (e) use the Services (s) only in accordance with this Agreement, the Documentation and any applicable
Users increases; and (e) use the Services (s) only in accordance with this Agreement, the Documentation and any applicable Laws.
«Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and indirect branch prediction may allow unauthorized
disclosure of information to an attacker with local
user access via a side - channel analysis
of the
data cache,» reads today's security advisory.
Facebook's late Friday
disclosure that a
data analytics company with ties to the Trump campaign improperly obtained — and then failed to destroy — the private
data of 50 million
users is generating more unwanted attention from politicians, some
of whom were already beating the drums
of regulation in the company's direction.
The Facebook Container add - on is one
of several steps Mozilla has taken to distance itself from Facebook following the
disclosures that Cambridge Analytica gained access to 50 million
users»
data without permission during the 2016 presidential campaign.
Description: Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and indirect branch prediction may allow unauthorized
disclosure of information to an attacker with local
user access via a side - channel analysis
of the
data cache.
Some called for investigations into whether Mr Zuckerberg's company may have violated laws governing
disclosure of a
data breach - and also rules on properly obtaining a
user's consent to collect personal information.
The proposed class action would represent people who bought Facebook shares from Feb. 3, 2017, when Facebook filed its annual report and cited security breaches and improper access to
user data, through March 19
of this year, two days after a New York Times report revealed how
data from Cambridge Analytica obtained through Facebook were used without «proper
disclosures or permission.»
Because
of the awkward timing
of the reporting — just days after Stamos struggled to publicly defend the company's fraying reputation in the aftermath
of its stunning
disclosures involving the
data firm Cambridge Analytica — and because
of the internal debate that apparently led to Stamos» exit in progress: It was between those who think Facebook should prioritize doing right by its
users and those who think its first responsibility is to its profits.
The Menlo Park, California, company, whose social network is a ubiquitous venue for social and political life, is drawing the unaccustomed unwelcome attention after the
disclosure that it released the personal
data of 50 million
users to an analytics firm that helped elect President Donald Trump.
In the complaint, EPIC asks the FTC to investigate Facebook, determine the extent
of the harm to consumer privacy and safety, require Facebook to cease collection and use
of users» biometric
data without their affirmative opt - in consent, require Facebook to give
users meaningful control over their personal information, establish appropriate security safeguards, and limit the
disclosure of user information to third parties.
The proposed class action would represent people who bought shares
of Facebook from Feb. 3, 2017, when Facebook filed its annual report and cited security breaches and improper access to
user data, through March 19, two days after a New York Times report revealed how
data from Cambridge Analytica obtained through Facebook was used without «proper
disclosures or permission.»
In a truly remarkable turn
of events, Yahoo in 2016 not only claimed the crown
of Biggest
Data Breach Ever with the September
disclosure of a 2014 breach that affected 500 million
users.
Facebook's late Friday
disclosure that a
data analytics company with ties to the Trump campaign improperly obtained — and then failed to destroy — the private
data of 50 million
users is generating...
A US Coinbase
user has filed a class action lawsuit against Coinbase, accusing the platform
of insider non-public
data disclosure regarding Bitcoin Cash trading.
While the exact nature
of their role remains somewhat mysterious, Facebook's
disclosure suggests that the company improperly obtained
user data that could have given it an unfair advantage in reaching voters.
The revelation came weeks after the
disclosure of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, wherein personal
data of 77 million
users was improperly gathered and misused by the political consultancy firm, who reportedly also helped Donald Trump win the US presidency in 2016.
However, an «alleged» information
disclosure vulnerability discovered in Hotspot Shield results in the exposure
of users data, like the name
of Wi - Fi network name (if connected), their real IP... (continued)
Quick actions prevented the
disclosure of National Security
data to 165000
users.