DiNapoli's plan calls on the state to bring more transparency and accountability to state finances by eliminating discretionary lump sum appropriations, restricting «backdoor spending» by public authorities, requiring more
disclosure of public authorities» spending and financing, and making the state budget more understandable and accessible.
His proposal also requires more
disclosure of public authorities» spending and financing activities.»
Not exact matches
To the extent permitted by law, we will disclose your information to government
authorities or third parties if: (a) required to do so by law, or in response to a subpoena or court order; (b) we believe in our sole discretion that
disclosure is reasonably necessary to protect against fraud, to protect the property or other rights
of us or other users, third parties or the
public at large; or (c) we believe that you have abused the Sites or the Applications by using them to attack other systems or to gain unauthorized access to any other system, to engage in spamming or otherwise to violate applicable laws.
Among the Buffalo Billion related questions were the review
of Joe Percoco's
disclosure form revealing outside income from Buffalo Billion vendors, details
of Cuomo's last conversation with Percoco, the recent
disclosure by Solar City
of a reduction in the expected number
of jobs, why the
Public Authorities Control Board delayed a decision of funding certain payments related to Solar City and whether public money funding the Buffalo Billion was treated «as sacred» and if so, why an investigation is occu
Public Authorities Control Board delayed a decision
of funding certain payments related to Solar City and whether
public money funding the Buffalo Billion was treated «as sacred» and if so, why an investigation is occu
public money funding the Buffalo Billion was treated «as sacred» and if so, why an investigation is occurring.
Today, we applaud the New Jersey Assembly for voting in favor
of two reform bills that would significantly improve
public disclosure and accountability at the Port
Authority of New York & New Jersey: S2181 / A3417 and S2183 / A3350.
DiNapoli's proposal would require state - funded
public authority projects to be «scored and ranked using measurable and objective criteria,» he said, as well as greater
disclosure of those
authorities» activities.
Authorities say Silver shifted state healthcare funding to a pool that he directly controlled so that he was able to distribute the cash «at his discretion, with no
public disclosure of the disbursements,» the documents say.
Section 77
of the Freedom
of Information Act makes it an offence for
public authorities to act so as to prevent intentionally the
disclosure of requested information.
Before a single child's information is turned over to any 3rd party, policymakers should give assurance to parents and educators that no harm will come to Tennessee school children by adopting the following principles: The state and districts should be required to publish any and all existing data sharing agreements in printed and electronic form, and include a thorough explanation
of its purpose and provisions, and make it available to parents and local school
authorities statewide; The Department
of Education should hold hearings throughout the state or testify before the legislature to explain any existing data agreement, and answer questions from the
public or their representatives, obtain informed comment, and gauge
public reaction; All parents should have the right to be notified
of the impending
disclosure of their children's data, and provide them with a right to consent or have the right to withhold their children's information from being shared; The state should have to define what rights families or individuals will have to obtain relief if harmed by improper use or release
of their child's private information, including how claims can be made; and finally, any legislation must ensure that the privacy interest
of public school children and their families are put above the interests
of any 3rd Party and its agents and subsidiaries.
The U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT) is committed to protecting current and former Federal employees and applicants for employment from interference and retaliation when making protected
disclosures, or «whistleblowing,» which includes disclosing information related to a violation
of law, rule, or regulation; gross mismanagement; gross waste
of funds; abuse
of authority; or a substantial and specific danger to
public health or safety.
It occurs to me that a bottomless pit
of public money is available to resist unwelcome efforts to obtain
disclosures from
public authorities — not only on climate issues, but especially for them.
Section 77
of the Freedom
of Information Act makes it an offence for
public authorities to act so as to prevent intentionally the
disclosure of requested information..
The FOI Act makes it an offence for
public authorities to act so as to prevent intentionally the
disclosure of requested information.
(a) a request for information has been made to a
public authority, and (b) under section 1
of this Act or section 7
of the Data Protection Act 1998, the applicant would have been entitled (subject to payment
of any fee) to communication
of any information in accordance with that section, any person to whom this subsection applies is guilty
of an offence if he alters, defaces, blocks, erases, destroys or conceals any record held by the
public authority, with the intention
of preventing the
disclosure by that
authority of all, or any part,
of the information to the communication
of which the applicant would have been entitled.
any person to whom this subsection applies is guilty
of an offence if he alters, defaces, blocks, erases, destroys or conceals any record held by the
public authority, with the intention
of preventing the
disclosure by that
authority of all, or any part,
of the information to the communication
of which the applicant would have been entitled.
When entering into contracts with non-
public authority contractors,
public authorities may be under pressure to accept confidentiality clauses so that information relating to the terms
of the contract, its value and performance will be exempt from
disclosure.
Thus in the words
of Judge LJ: ``... the 2000 Act may properly be seen as Parliament's considered statutory framework for the
disclosure of information held by
public authorities, whose enactment militates against the incremental judicial perception
of a common law duty to the same or any wider extent.»
If it does not, there is cause for concern and it may be that the arrangements between those parties need to be revisited, whether by means
of contractual changes or protocols for information
disclosure to secure appropriate
disclosure to the
public authority to allow it to meet its
public obligations.
The Commission said, in effect, that the absolute exemption to
disclosure at section 32 (2)
of FOIA was the end
of the story, while Kennedy argued that Article 10
of the European Convention on Human Rights imposed a positive obligation
of disclosure on
public authorities, particularly when the requester was a «
public watchdog» like the press, and that s32 (2) should be read down accordingly to require
disclosure in the circumstances (I paraphrase).
As pointed out elsewhere, contracting
authorities and review courts should be particularly careful in not imposing excessive
disclosure when there are actual risks
of strategic use
of challenge procedures or the market structure is such that the increased degree
of transparency could (inadvertently) facilitate or reinforce collusion [Sanchez Graells, A.
Public Procurement and the EU Competition Rules (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2011) 358 - 9].
An award may be made
public with the consent
of all parties or where and to the extent
disclosure is required
of a party by legal duty, to protect or pursue a legal right or in relation to legal proceedings before a court or other competent
authority.
(xiii) in case
of minor breaches which are no longer effective, as alternative to the above penalties, competent
authorities may apply the penalty
of a
public disclosure of the identity
of the breach committed and the offender.
For example, if under § 164.512 (b), a covered entity discloses the same protected health information to a
public health
authority for the same purpose every month, it can account for those
disclosures by including in the accounting the date
of the first
disclosure, the
public health
authority to whom the
disclosures were made and the
public health
authority's address, a brief description
of the information disclosed, a brief description
of the purpose
of the
disclosures, the fact that the
disclosures were made every month during the accounting period, and the date
of the most recent
disclosure.
Comment: Several commenters recommended expanding the scope
of disclosures permissible under proposed § 164.510 (b)(1)(iii), which would have allowed covered entities to disclose protected health information to private entities that could demonstrate that they were acting to comply with requirements, or at the direction,
of a
public health
authority.
As discussed above, in the final rule we narrow the scope
of this paragraph as it applies to
disclosures to persons other than
public health
authorities.
Other common exemptions include
disclosures for emergency care, and for
disclosures to government
authorities (such as a department
of public health).
(C) If the
disclosure is to a person acting on behalf
of a
public official, a written statement on appropriate government letterhead that the person is acting under the government's
authority or other evidence or documentation
of agency, such as a contract for services, memorandum
of understanding, or purchase order, that establishes that the person is acting on behalf
of the
public official.
Comment: A number
of the comments called for the elimination
of all permissible
disclosures without authorization, and some specifically cited the
public health section and its liberal definition
of public health
authority as an inappropriately broad loophole that would allow unfettered access to private medical information by various government
authorities.
Pursuant to § 164.512 (c)(1)(iii), a covered entity may make a report only if the specific type or subject matter
of the report (e.g., abuse or neglect
of the elderly) is included in the law authorizing the report, and such a
disclosure may only be made to a
public authority specifically identified in the law authorizing the report.
While it does not provide for
public disclosure, although the Commission is currently pressing for
public disclosure of the country - by - country tax reports which must be filed with tax
authorities by large businesses, the new Directive requires tax rulings to be disclosed to the Commission.
For section 41 to apply: (i) the information must be confidential; (ii) the information must be obtained by the
public authority from any other person; and (iii)
disclosure of the information by the
public authority must constitute an actionable breach
of confidence.
Other Legally Required
Disclosures CareerBuilder Employment Screening preserves the right to disclose without your prior permission any Personal Information about you or your use
of this Site if CareerBuilder Employment Screening has a good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) protect and defend the rights, property or safety
of CareerBuilder Employment Screening, employees, other users
of this Site, or the
public; (b) enforce the terms and conditions that apply to use
of this Site; (c) as required by a legally valid request from a competent governmental
authority; or (d) respond to claims that any content violates the rights
of third - parties.