written
disclosures under Division 2 [Disclosures] of Part 5 [Relationships with Principals and Parties] or Part 9 [Licensee Exemptions] of these rules and any related acknowledgments;
Not exact matches
Agreements made without appropriate
disclosure may be set aside if they are challenged in property
division and spousal support cases
under the following sections:
In Scheeler v. Office of the Governor, the Appellate
Division held that third - party requests for documents
under the Open Public Records Act (OPRA) are subject to
disclosure under OPRA.
We do not intend to require authorization for uses and
disclosures made by sale, rental, or barter or for
disclosures made to non-health related
divisions of the covered entity, if those uses or
disclosures could otherwise be made without authorization
under this rule.
In the final rule, we clarify that
disclosure to a non-health related
division does not require authorization if the use or
disclosure is otherwise permitted or required
under the rule.
We determined that the example could lead covered entities to the mistaken conclusion that some uses or
disclosures that would otherwise be permitted
under the rule without authorization would require authorization when made to a non-health related
division of the covered entity.
Filed
Under: Divorce - General, How we work, Practical Advice Tagged With: Asset
Division, Collaborative Divorce, Collaborative Law, divorce, Equitable Distribution, Financial
Disclosures