Sentences with phrase «discourse on climate science»

«Rather than empower scientists and researchers to expand the public discourse on climate science and other environmental topics, the [Democrats»] letter could be viewed as an attempt to silence legitimate intellectual and scientific inquiry,» the Republicans» letter said.

He writes basic level rebuttals and occasional blog posts for Skeptical Science, motivated in part by a concern for the environment, and partly as a counter-reaction to the demagoguery and disinformation that pervades the public discourse on climate science.

The «Heat» generated by political discourse on climate science is fierce as anybody knows.

Not exact matches

Nonsense on Stilts by Massimo Pigliucci (University of Chicago Press) A tour of solid science, shaky science, and pseudoscience, this crash course in critical thinking by biologist and philosopher Pigliucci includes handy rules for evaluating the confused public discourse on climate change, evolution, and even UFOs.

«The emotionally charged, politicized discourse on GMOs is mired in the kind of fever swamps that have polluted climate science beyond recognition,» the environmental writer Keith Kloor wrote in a Slate article that proclaimed GMO opponents «the climate skeptics of the left.»

But of course in the polarized discourse on climate change, you know both will be reverberating for quite awhile wherever their conclusions are seen as useful, regardless of the final word on the science.

If Mann had wanted to point to an opposite end to the spectrum of ways in which scientists can contribute to public discourse on global warming science and risks, a better choice (in my view) would have been Susan Solomon's handling of the rollout of the 2007 science report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

how refreshing to know that there can still be a civil discourse between «advocates on both sides of the charged debate over climate science and its implications for society.»

The need for «sweating the details in climate discourse» came up here in 2010, after the journal Science picked a faked image of a polar bear on an ice floe to accompany a letter on the seriousness of global warming from 255 members of the National Academy of Sciences.

Steven E. Koonin, once the Obama administration's undersecretary of energy for science and chief scientist at BP, stirred up a swirl of turbulence in global warming discourse this week after The Wall Street Journal published «Climate Science is Not Settled,» his essay calling for more frankness about areas of deep uncertainty in climate science, more research to narrow error ranges and more acknowledgement that society's decisions on energy and climate policy are based on values as much ascience and chief scientist at BP, stirred up a swirl of turbulence in global warming discourse this week after The Wall Street Journal published «Climate Science is Not Settled,» his essay calling for more frankness about areas of deep uncertainty in climate science, more research to narrow error ranges and more acknowledgement that society's decisions on energy and climate policy are based on values as much aClimate Science is Not Settled,» his essay calling for more frankness about areas of deep uncertainty in climate science, more research to narrow error ranges and more acknowledgement that society's decisions on energy and climate policy are based on values as much aScience is Not Settled,» his essay calling for more frankness about areas of deep uncertainty in climate science, more research to narrow error ranges and more acknowledgement that society's decisions on energy and climate policy are based on values as much aclimate science, more research to narrow error ranges and more acknowledgement that society's decisions on energy and climate policy are based on values as much ascience, more research to narrow error ranges and more acknowledgement that society's decisions on energy and climate policy are based on values as much aclimate policy are based on values as much as data.

«Risks of Communication: Discourses on Climate Change in Science, Politics, and the Mass Media.»

However, the IPCC body of work is not the whole conglomeration of Climate Science knowledge, theories and ideas, and there is good reason to ask for a network of the individual and disparate parts of the discourse to be treated as if they (the ideas) agreed to seek deliberate process improvement on both sides.

We face a tremendous gap between what scientists warn about the dangers of global warming and what the public understands, and a discourse that has been hijacked by toxic, politically motivated attacks on the credibility of the climate science community.

Please let me (very seriously and sincerely) that in regard to climate - change science, Judith Curry's sustained commitment to open public discourse is among valuable contributions of any scientist, and that (as it seems to me) the name «Curry» amply deserves to be on the short list of prize committees around the world.

Good on «yah TonyB for consistently rational respectful responsible climate - science discourse!

A 2016 analysis in the Journal of Environmental Studies and Science found that, between Hurricane Katrina and the pre-election Hurricane Sandy in 2012, the public discourse surrounding extreme weather shifted dramatically from a purely economic and energy discussion to one focused on climate.

I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide sound science for the people and reassurance to the scared - snipless; this was the moment when the rise of bullsnip began to slow and our political discourse began to heal; this was the moment when we ended the climate - war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on earth.

In the USA, the «Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change» (NIPCC) report (Idso et al. 2009; NIPCC 2013), the «Science & Environmental Policy Project» (SEPP), and the Heartland Institute have played an active role in the public discourse, providing a platform for the public dissemination of papers at variance with the notion of anthropogenic climate Climate Change» (NIPCC) report (Idso et al. 2009; NIPCC 2013), the «Science & Environmental Policy Project» (SEPP), and the Heartland Institute have played an active role in the public discourse, providing a platform for the public dissemination of papers at variance with the notion of anthropogenic climate climate change.

Last year, he gave evidence to and answered questions from, a UK House of Lords Committee investigating the economics of climate change, in which he discoursed freely on the science.

But there is one important difference: The idea that basic climate science is not only yet to be «settled», but based on a hoax and fraud, has itself become part of acceptable civil discourse.

On a previous thread I thought that I had heard «academic discourse» for the first time in climate science.

2000 Peter Weingart, et al., «Risks of Communication: Discourses on Climate Change in Science, Politics, and the Mass Media.»