Sentences with phrase «discovering skeptic climate»

But her overall situation worsens through an apparent inability to keep her stories straight on what led her to discover skeptic climate scientists were «industry - corrupted.»

Imagine how joyful environmentalists would be if they discovered skeptic climate scientists were the good guys all this time, bringing good news about a planet that's not actually in peril while warning about questionably - minded One Percenter enviro - activists apparently preying on a fearful public to enrich themselves.

Not exact matches

(As we discovered at a convention of climate change skeptics, polar bears are a flash point for those who oppose the regulation of carbon emissions, as well.)

And wouldn't those talking points pack a fatal punch with reporters if you could say a Pulitzer winning investigative reporter discovered a leaked coal industry memo which was proof for skeptic climate scientists being paid to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact.»

It's a major problem that the «industry - corrupted skeptic climate scientists are paid to lie» accusation has no evidence to support it, but now it appears the person widely credited with «discovering / exposing» that corruption is seen with significantly conflicting dates of when he actually started examining skeptic scientists.

Reporters need to actively ferret out these problems on a weekly basis rather than waiting until climate skeptics and blogs discover them and blow their significance out of proportion.

Many «skeptics» seem to argue from an unwritten assumption that warming happened, climate scientists saw it, asked «what caused this warming», discovered Co2 as a good candidate and the AGW theory was born.

In telling the tale of inadvertently discovering how skeptic climate scientists are corrupted, a person might be viewed as a hero or heroine, and it is understandably forgivable if the hero / heroine has a memory lapse about exactly when this event happened, or about minor narrative details surrounding it.

He said Gelbspan discovered leaked memo evidence proving the guilt of skeptic climate scientists.

Was he little more than a theatrical device to give her the appearance of «accidentally connecting the dots» on who Dr Singer was, much the way Ross Gelbspan's invitation to co-author a newspaper article supposedly led him to accidentally discover the «industry corruption» of skeptic climate scientists?

That's how I opened my April 25, 2014 post regarding his repeated overall tale of a) minding his own business, b) being contacted / approached by health / climate change article series writer Dr Paul Epstein, which, c) prompted him to co-author an article with Epstein, that, d) resulted in a backlash of letter - writers which e) is what led Gelbspan to look into the works of skeptic climate scientists, who, f) he learned / discovered / was tipped that they were «industry - corrupted.»

Nearly ten years before Greenpeace's supposed FOIA request, Ross Gelbspan personally received Dr Michaels» CV when both were attending the May 1995 Minnesota Public Utilities Commission hearings where Gelbspan supposedly discovered the «industry bribery of skeptic climate scientists.»

I've already detailed the way Desmog's founder James Hoggan essentially torpedoes his site's entire existence with the way he first admits he knows nothing about climate science, but is certain that skeptic climate scientists are liars, the latter of which he derives entirely from Ross Gelbspan, the «Pulitzer - winning investigator» who Al Gore says discovered the supposedly leaked Western Fuels Association «Information Council for the Environment» (ICE) PR campaign's sinister strategy to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact.»