Getting sidetracked about discussions concerning how far they can swim is just sick obfuscation being propagated by deniers who want to
discredit any global warming science.
Consider the oddball doctors who took tobacco money to deny a link between cigarette smoking and cancer, or the handful of scientists who take oil and coal money to
discredit global warming science, or the people who have done both.
Not exact matches
Sadly, in recent years we have become accustomed to a ritual in which the publication of each new result on anthropogenic climate change is greeted by a flurry of activity from industry - funded lobby groups, think tanks and PR professionals, who try to
discredit the
science and confuse the public about
global warming.
Whenever the treaty's advocates, including the Clinton Administration, discuss
global warming, they present the
science as essentially settled and unchallengeable, and they compare dissenting scientists to
discredited apologists for the tobacco companies.
As their «
science» continues to be exposed and
discredited by genuine scientists and astute researchers, we can expect their noisy chorus to get even noisier, in a desperate attempt to push through a new UN climate regime in Paris — before taxpayers completely pull the plug on their
global -
warming gravy train.
The biggest danger represented by Brulle and other Great
Global Warming Conspiracy theorists is that, as they work to
discredit their adversaries and ban them from the public debate, they attack
science itself.
«Climate Depot is one of the very best compilations of the exploding climate
science literature which is now
discrediting and destroying the
global warming fraud.
One might have thought the revelations would
discredit the
science underlying proposed
global warming policy.
The spectacular implosion of the alleged «
science» behind now -
discredited global warming theories in recent years has led many experts and scientists to distance themselves from the hysteria.
«Climate Cover - up: The Crusade to Deny
Global Warming is a remarkable deconstruction of what he argues is a carefully orchestrated propaganda campaign whose goal is to set the agenda in climate policy by
discrediting legitimate
science and manipulating public perceptions of the scientific evidence... I have no doubt that Climate Cover - up is going to stir up controversy, particularly in the United States where many of these strategies were deployed and fine - tuned.»
Second, in his courage, his decency, and his understanding of the truth about
global warming science, Happer is exactly what America needs to restore a semblance of integrity to the
discredited world of US government
science after years of corruption, incompetence and neglect.
In 1998, following the negotiation of the Kyoto Protocol on
global warming, the American Petroleum Institute convened a task force to spend more than $ 5.9 million to
discredit climate
science and quash growing public support of curbing emissions.
By calling the
science «still incomplete,» Bush also lent new credibility to the tiny handful of industry - sponsored «greenhouse skeptics» who have been thoroughly
discredited by the mainstream community of climate researchers — including the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the National Academy of Sciences and other blue - ribbon scientific groups that deem
global warming to be real, immediate and ominous.
Additionally, UCS» Sound
Science Initiative attempted to
discredit the
Global Warming Petition Project, a statement signed by more than 31,000 scientists stating humans are not causing a global warming c
Global Warming Petition Project, a statement signed by more than 31,000 scientists stating humans are not causing a global warming
Warming Petition Project, a statement signed by more than 31,000 scientists stating humans are not causing a
global warming c
global warming warming crisis.
«Manmade
Global Warming» is a collection of ideas that have been thoroughly
discredited by real
science for years.
Yet after a decade of internal discussions and research on
global warming, Exxon spent more than 20 years
discrediting climate change
science.
Democratic Reps. Mark DeSaulnier and Ted Lieu, both members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said they were «alarmed» by the possibility that Exxon withheld significant climate change information and went so far as to try to
discredit the
science confirming
global warming.
The hubbub was sparked when retired NOAA data scientist John Bates claimed in a blog post that his boss, then - director of the National Centers for Environmental Information Thomas Karl, «constantly had his «thumb on the scale» — in the documentation, scientific choices and release of datasets — in an effort to
discredit the notion of a
global warming hiatus» and rushed a study published in the journal
Science before international climate negotiations.
He has done that.The «holy grail» of
Global Warming has been
discredited & the
science is inconclusive.
The excellent
science and statistics blogger Tim Lambert has proposed a game called»
global warming skeptic bingo,» in which all of the various
discredited arguments that are repeatedly used to undermine the consensus view of human - caused climate change are arranged in a series of squares.
During the show, Beck and those he featured rehashed several falsehoods and misleading talking points in an attempt to
discredit the scientific consensus on
global warming and to claim that former Vice President Al Gore «exaggerate [d]» and misrepresented climate
science in the documentary An Inconvenient Truth (Paramount Classics, 2006).
If that happens, the activists crying «wolf» (e.g., attributing any severe weather to
global warming, even when scientists and history say otherwise) might
discredit not just themselves but climate
science — and perhaps even
science.
Pat Michaels: High School
Science Discredits The New York Times» Latest
Global Warming Whopper — Forbes