In 2018, that cap is $ 549 billion for
discretionary defense spending, $ 54 billion below Trump's plan.
White House officials said today that they will ask Congress to increase
discretionary defense spending by $ 54 billion, to $ 603 billion, in the 2018 fiscal year which begins 1 October.
It calls for boosting
discretionary defense spending in 2018 by $ 54 billion, and paying for that increase by cutting discretionary spending at civilian agencies such as EPA.
Not exact matches
The February federal budget deal, meanwhile, hikes outlays in both of the two categories of «
discretionary»
spending,
defense and federal programs from foreign aid to housing subsidies, by an unprecedented 12 %, or $ 150 billion a year in 2018 and 2019.
Republican Presidents, including Trump, have promised to balance future budgets with gigantic reductions in
discretionary spending, a category that includes both outlays for
defense, and all other areas that are voted each year (as opposed to entitlements that provide benefits guided by a fixed formula).
«Republicans always wanted to raise
spending on
defense, Democrats wanted to raise
spending on the rest of the
discretionary budget across the board, and Republicans supported increased
spending on a lot of those line items as well.»
My guess is you'll see expenditure reductions in
defense because in terms of
discretionary spending, it's the largest department.
That amount would be about evenly split between plans for $ 530 billion in
discretionary nonmilitary
spending, and $ 561 billion in
defense spending, according to The Washington Post.
With mandatory
spending and interest costs growing rapidly, there is little room for growth in the
defense or non-
defense discretionary budgets.
On
discretionary (appropriated)
spending, the budget would adhere to the current
defense spending caps through 2021 and growing with the CBO baseline thereafter.
After that, the budgets make similar changes to
discretionary spending (higher
defense and lower non-
defense), though with different numbers.
However, the Senate budget allows the
discretionary spending level to be increased if Congress enacts legislation increasing the limit on
defense spending without requiring that increase be offset by savings elsewhere in the budget.
People keep forgetting that most government
spending is transfer payments, but it is only purchases of labor and goods that go directly into the GDP calculations, and it is these accounts that will get smacked by the sequester of
discretionary defense and non-
defense budgets.
Fiscal 2017
Defense Appropriations — Vote Passed (371 - 48, 10 Not Voting) The legislation would provide full - year appropriations for
Defense Department programs and activities for fiscal 2017, providing $ 577.9 billion in
discretionary spending, $ 5.2 billion more than fiscal 2016.
Both plans also contain significant reductions in funding for domestic non-entitlement (also known as «
discretionary») programs and significant increases in
defense spending.
For instance, the New York Democrat calls Ryan's proposed
spending cuts «totally unrealistic,» including the idea that
discretionary spending, including
defense, could be reduced to under 4 percent of gross domestic product in 2050.
This year's resolution, approved by the House Budget Committee earlier this month, has tax and entitlement reform as its major goals, but also recommends a big boost for
defense discretionary spending at the expense of nondefense
discretionary spending — a recommendation similar to what the White House proposed.
During a Thursday budget hearing, for instance, House Appropriator Rep. Ken Calvert (R - CA) told
Defense Secretary James Mattis, «Most if not all of us agree that the base on defense must go up... but the funding on military can not be obtained on the back of nondefense discretionary sp
Defense Secretary James Mattis, «Most if not all of us agree that the base on
defense must go up... but the funding on military can not be obtained on the back of nondefense discretionary sp
defense must go up... but the funding on military can not be obtained on the back of nondefense
discretionary spending.
The figures would also be affected, of course, by how Congress and the Administration chose to allocate the reductions between the major budget categories of
defense and nondefense
discretionary spending.
Over the past four decades, except in the 1960s during the heyday of the Apollo Program (which in respect to R&D funding was an exceptional situation), trends in nondefense R&D
spending have closely followed trends in overall nondefense
discretionary spending, and trends in total federal R&D, including
defense, have tracked total
discretionary spending.
While the Trump Administration has proposed deep cuts to nondefense
discretionary spending to allow a
defense increase, that approach has been widely rejected, if for no other reason than it would require the politically impossible hurdle of 60 votes in the Senate.
«Further, the president's budget, which cuts nondefense
discretionary spending while significantly increasing
defense spending eliminates the parity between
defense and nondefense
spending that has been a hallmark of America's recent fiscal policy.»
The bipartisan deal raises the caps on
defense and nondefense
discretionary spending by nearly $ 300 billion overall.
The assorted cuts described above and below are facilitated by changes to the current
discretionary spending caps, which dictate the size of annual appropriations each year, and which contain nearly all
defense and nondefense science and technology investments.
-- Since
Defense /
Discretionary spending's mostly for the «greater good `, politicians could reasonably hope some of these cuts would go unnoticed.
Remember, this is all
discretionary spending, so none of the big stuff — the
defense budget, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, etc — was touched.
Cook said he expects lawmakers to forge a deal before the end of the year on avoiding sequestration — the round of automatic
spending cuts that will impact
defense and other
discretionary spending categories — and take up some type of tax reform in 2013.