You forgot one,
discrimination against religion, use of federal ID to track a person.
While they believe, in theory, there ought to be vouchers, that parental choice is a good idea, that there has been
discrimination against religion, they're perfectly cognizant of the fact that many voucher advocates are really less concerned with the well being of religious education as they are with dismantling, disestablishing, literally, the public schools from their preferred place in American life.
Washington courts may approve of state
discrimination against religion, but the U.S. Supreme Court has adopted instead a rule of neutrality: «State power is no more to be used so as to handicap religions, than it is to favor them.»
Thats
discrimination against a religion!!!
«First and foremost, we always will abide by the U.S. Constitution which prohibits
discrimination against religions,» de Blasio said.
Not exact matches
Nor should you insert
religion into your political speech, as Title VII and many state laws protects
against discrimination based on
religion.
It is the policy of Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to provide equal opportunity in employment throughout the corporation for all qualified applicants and employees without
discrimination against any person because of a person's race, color,
religion (including religious dress and grooming practices), sex / gender (including pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions and breast feeding), national origin, ancestry, gender identity, gender expression, legally - protected medical condition, physical or mental disability, age, military or veteran status, marital status, sexual orientation, genetic information or any other basis protected by applicable law.
«ACT for America has never, and will never, tolerate any bias,
discrimination, or violence
against anyone, based on their
religion, gender, race, or political persuasion,» Act for America told Newsweek in a statement.
Freedom of
religion and freedom of speech should mean there is no
discrimination for or
against a group because of what it is teaching.
I have heard believers den.igrate my friends because of their natural se.xual orientation, and have heard politicians try to legislate
discrimination against women and gays based on their
religion.
I'm not defending their current policies which need more transparancy and alterations to allow anyone to believe in any
religion they want, but this article masks real religious injustice of the
discrimination against Tibetians and their religious practices by making it a «Christian» persecution thing.
This untoward result - interpreting a Constitution intended to guarantee religious liberty as requiring affirmative
discrimination against people of faith - would seem to be the necessary result of a doctrine of separation that invalidates government action that lacks a «secular purpose» or has the effect of «advanc [ing]...
religion» (Lemon v. Kurtzman [1970]-RRB-.
Are you suggesting that
discrimination against someone's
religion is ok?
reveals no instance where the Court ruled on the merits of a civil, criminal, or administrative action involving government favoritism or
discrimination against a particular
religion.
They outlaw the
discrimination against any citizen on the ground only of his
religion, whether it be in the matter of public employment or access to public places and even charity.
Yet even in his own
religion there was
discrimination against non Jews.
Feel sorry for those and my heart feels for them and wish them guidance to God and true peaceful belief brings love and mercy to humanity which is losing it meaning every day with what's happening all through the world because of disrespect, loss of morals,
discrimination, unexplained hatred
against nations and
religions?!
The meaning of scripture can be twisted to serve the purposes of men so we must do everything that we can to ensure that the «Good Words» that are taught are the actual words of Yehoshua rather than the selected words of Paul and the Old Testament that form the basis of
discrimination against women, racial minorities, homosexuals, and «different»
religions (including atheism).
The ever vigilant state charged her with illegal
discrimination and took her to court, where the California Supreme Court ruled
against her appeal to the free exercise of her
religion.
A
religion is not a
religion when it promotes
discrimination, hate
against another
religion and people of different orientation.
The declaration highlighted that, despite the Russian Constitution guaranteeing every citizen the right to freedom of
religion or belief, Russian authorities «continue to foster an atmosphere of intolerance,
discrimination and persecution
against religious minorities throughout the entire Federation».
In the UK according to the Equality Act 2010 there are certain «protected characteristics» which include
religion (including atheism) and sexual orientation
against discrimination.
No more
discrimination against atheists in politics, adoption, divorce, no more pushing
religion on kids in schools.
«Vistaprint in no way condones - and does not tolerate -
discrimination against any of our customers based on their race,
religion, gender or sexual orientation.»
Therefore, BWI does not condone silencing, tone policing, or otherwise oppressing marginalized groups, nor does BWI discriminate or permit
discrimination by any member of its community
against any individual on the basis of age, citizenship status, class, color, disability, gender expression, gender identity, marital status, national origin, parental status, race,
religion, sex, or sexual orientation.
«I vividly remember her work to break the cycle of violence
against women and to stop
discrimination based on race, income,
religion, ability, region, gender identity, or genetic information.»
These policies were found not to constitute direct
discrimination against the employees, as it did not target them on the basis of their specific
religion.
Equality We want a society which is based on equality and respect for diversity with robust equality laws
against irrelevant
discrimination, not least in the context of the «
religion or belief» and «sexual orientation» equality strands.
«The further suggestions in Lord Carey's statement that recent court judgments which have not upheld claims of unlawful
discrimination against Christians in the workplace are a threat to the social order and a step away from barring Christians from any employment is scaremongering, and a desperate cry from those unrepresentative few who are trying to retain the kind of privileges for
religion that have no place in our society.»
He should learn how to abide by our laws that reject employment
discrimination against people because of sex, color, race nationality,
religion, sexual preference, etc..
She was the first member of Congress to introduce gay rights legislation, her approach being a full - scale incorporation of sexual orientation into the protections afforded by the 1964 Civil Rights Act
against discrimination based on race,
religion, sex, and other categories.
Discrimination could include bias
against a staff member based on their
religion, ethnicity, age or sexual preference.
In this respect, the law shall prohibit any
discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and effective protection
against discrimination on any ground such as race, colour, sex, language,
religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
The Department of Transportation Civil Rights Offices are here to help eliminate, prevent, reduce, and remedy unlawful
discrimination on the basis of race, color,
religion, national origin, sex, age, disability, and sexual orientation
against beneficiaries and employees of the Department of Transportation.
Implementing equal opportunity laws and policies to prevent
discrimination based on race, color, national origin,
religion, sex, age, sexual orientation, and disability status, as well as protecting individuals
against reprisal / retaliation for filing a charge of
discrimination, participating in an investigation into alleged discriminatory practices, or opposing discriminatory practices
EEO requirements protect
against discrimination on the basis of race, color,
religion, national origin, sex, age, genetic information, disability, or veteran status.
Implementing equal opportunity laws and policies to prevent workplace
discrimination based on race, color, national origin,
religion, sex, age, sexual orientation, and disability status, as well as protecting individuals
against reprisal / retaliation for filing a charge of workplace
discrimination, participating in an investigation into alleged discriminatory practices, or opposing discriminatory practices.
The U.S. Fair Housing Act of 1968 and its amendments provide protection
against discrimination based on race, color, national origin,
religion, gender, disability and familial status, but in an announcement on July 2 HUD Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, John Trasvina noted «Our job to prevent and control housing
discrimination is not complete until we address 21st Century issues.»
This law forbids
discrimination against an applicant on the basis of race, color,
religion, national origin, sex, marital status or age.
Seattle Area Feline Rescue prohibits
discrimination against its employees, volunteers, applicants for employment, and customers or other business associates on the basis of a person's race,
religion, creed, color, sex, age, marital status, national origin, citizenship status, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, gender expression or identity, military or veteran status, any other characteristic protected by federal and applicable state laws.
It is the policy of IVHS not to engage in
discrimination against or harassment of any person employed or seeking employment with the Inland Valley Humane Society on the basis of race, color, national origin,
religion, sex, gender identity, pregnancy, physical or mental disability, medical condition, ancestry, marital status, age, sexual orientation, citizenship, or status as a covered veteran.
«Childhood, sexuality, memory, loss,
religion and
discrimination are themes that have always preoccupied Gober and for which he has developed his own unique pictorial language, influenced by Surrealism and by Minimal and Conceptual Art, though all read very much
against the grain.»
Later in life, I realized that the church was
against many other ways of life, cultures, other
religions, and beliefs and that instead of spreading peace and love, it often promotes hate and
discrimination.
In comments to that post, I approved a comment which was a diatribe
against religion (Christianity in particular) because of church - sanctioned
discrimination against homosexuals.
Workplace
discrimination occurs when an individual is unfavorably discriminated
against because of one or more factors, such as race, gender,
religion, age, sexual orientation, or ethnicity.
One of those cases, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, No. 16 - 111, pits allegations of unlawful sexual - orientation
discrimination against First Amendment values of free speech and free exercise of
religion.
Thompsons NI has a long history of representing workers who have been discriminated
against on the grounds of
religion or political opinion, as well as disability, gender, race, age and sexual orientation
discrimination claims.
The committee's proposal «moves beyond the comment to craft a distinct rule within the black letter of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct prohibiting lawyers from engaging in harassment and knowing
discrimination in conduct related to the practice of law»
against people on the basis of race, sex,
religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status or socioeconomic status.
For example, the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission investigates complaints about
discrimination stemming from a list of prohibited grounds set out in the legislation (race, sex,
religion etc.) If the Commission decides that an individual was wrongfully discriminated
against because they drove a red car, then it has stepped outside its jurisdiction.
Ontario's Human Rights Tribunal and Canada's Human Rights Tribunal provide protections
against discrimination and harassment on the basis of creed or
religion in most of the common forums listed in the Environics survey.