Not exact matches
This seems highly unwise, and, as I
discussed in a piece on HuffPost
about it, «Methane in the Twilight Zone, Episode 2,» * the more that you're planning on doing
anything about climate change — i.e., lowering GHG emissions, pulling carbon out of the system through biochar, afforestation, etc — the less sense it makes.
«I don't like to claim that I am an expert on
anything, but I have enough knowledge
about climate science and
climate system to be able to write scientific papers and go to meetings and talk
about monsoon systems and talk
about any other things that you want to
discuss about climate science issues.
All of which is a longer version of what President Clinton glibly said during the Clinton Global Initiative in September: The current US inaction on
climate, the denial of the science, and unwillingness to meaningfully even
discuss doing
anything about it all, means the US increasingly looks like a fool in the international community.