In addition to a written report prepared by the Stixrud Group, a feedback session is scheduled with your child to
discuss evaluation results.
The partnership is encouraged to
discuss evaluation results, observe each other's teaching, share strategies and tactics, and follow - up with each other.
Time is allotted at a Board meeting to
discuss the evaluation results.
Not exact matches
Such factors include, among others, general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties; the actual
results of current and future exploration activities; the actual
results of reclamation activities; conclusions of economic
evaluations; meeting various expected cost estimates; changes in project parameters and / or economic assessments as plans continue to be refined; future prices of metals; possible variations of mineral grade or recovery rates; the risk that actual costs may exceed estimated costs; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry; political instability; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of development or construction activities, as well as those factors
discussed in the section entitled «Risk Factors» in the Company's Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2017 dated March 15, 2018.
The board also
discussed the
results of teacher
evaluations from last year.
During the workshop, participants will (1) examine the current tools available to evaluate the impacts of public engagement on scientists and members of the public; (2)
discuss how to compare
results and use paired
evaluations to improve public engagement practices; and (3) identify opportunities to increase the use of
evaluation tools for scientists and members of the public.
Following the
evaluation, together we will review a detailed report of your child's
results and
discuss how Brain Balance may be able to help.
This paper
discusses the history of SLOs in NYS, in - district considerations for developing SLOs, regression model methodology, and an
evaluation of the model comparing actual 2014 student
results to predicted 2014 student
results.
Researchers and district officials
discussed the first
evaluations of the California Office to Reform Education, Read more about Early
Results in California's CORE Districts -LSB-...]
Panelists
discussed the program's development, review the
evaluation results, and consider the implications for policy.
The board also
discussed the
results of teacher
evaluations from last year.
Major factors for success and overall
results from BGCA's two - year
evaluation of computer science in Clubs will be shared and participants will
discuss plans and frameworks for implementing computer science in their own programs.
A Tool that provides a framework for evaluating the quality of an SLO and serves as a companion to the SLO Rubric: SLO Review Tool Considerations for Analyzing Educators» Contributions to Student Learning in Non-tested Subjects and Grades with a focus on Student Learning Objectives This paper
discusses the many challenges of measuring student academic growth for teacher
evaluations in non-tested subjects and grades, while offering potential solutions for incorporating student performance
results in these
evaluations.
Early
results of the controversial teacher
evaluations will be
discussed in Trenton today, when the
Evaluation Pilot Advisory Committee's report is presented at the monthly state Board of Education meeting.
This short video presentation will help you prepare for your meeting with the school to
discuss the
results of your child's special education
evaluation.
Discuss how student CMT and CAPT scores are to be used in
evaluation, given that March test administration
results are not received until August, well after the teacher's
evaluation based on those students must be completed.
Presenters will describe and
discuss this unique community approach to innovative learning and share
results from a ten - year impact
evaluation.
(c) You must explain that, if further medical
evaluation is needed for the verification process, the employee must comply with your request for this
evaluation and that failure to do so is equivalent of expressly declining to
discuss the test
result.
Before we
discuss the
results of our
evaluation of the 2016 Chrysler 300, it is helpful to understand who buys this sedan and what they like most and least about it.
Before we
discuss the
results of our
evaluation of the 2017 Tacoma, it's helpful to understand who buys this pickup truck and what they like most and least about it.
Before we
discuss the
results of our
evaluation of the 2017 Pilot, it's helpful to understand who buys this SUV and what they like most and least about it.
Before we
discuss the
results of our
evaluation of the 2017 Mazda 6, it's helpful to understand who buys this midsize car and what they like most and least about it.
What Owners Say Before we
discuss the
results of our
evaluation of the new 2018 Q5, it is helpful to understand who bought the previous version of this SUV, and what they liked most and least about it.
Not every implementation of an intervention is equally effective, so in our intervention
evaluations we try to consider representative implementations, and we
discuss the factors that are most likely to affect
results when they vary.
After we have gathered information about your pet and the exam and
evaluation are complete, we will
discuss the
results and options with you so you can make the best decision for your pet.
Chief Justice Mark E. Recktenwald and the Judicial
Evaluation Review Panel
discuss the
results with the individual judges.
Topics
discussed include: strategies for identifying the required elements for a potential malpractice action; the
evaluation of the defenses that might bar recovery or defeat a claim; establishing or refuting the applicable standard of care with expert testimony; identifying when a conflict of interest
results in divided loyalties, when such a conflict may form the basis of a claim, and the defenses to such conflict of interest claims; and distinguishing malpractice liability from a violation of professional ethical standards and if or when such standards are relevant to litigating a malpractice claim.