Sentences with phrase «discuss it with anyone»

Asked about his contract situation at an England press conference on Sunday, Smalling said: «That is one that I have not really discussed with anyone.

Other than my sister and one friend, I don't discuss it with anyone.

«We are surprised by the conduct of the media sometimes; since the issue happened I know for a fact that my boss never discussed with anyone that he'll be a witness in court.

Our bowel movement is a topic we rarely feel comfortable discussing with anyone, except our doctor.

It has been a challenge to find clothes that fit without making me feel awful, and I can't really discuss it with anyone because everyone just tells me that it's beautiful because I'm pregnant.

I am a good cook and love for people to enjoy my cooking????, I am an older man and there are some things that I can do and there are some things I may not be able to do, which I would discuss with anyone who...

Again, I've never discussed this with anyone, but it seems to me that we do less coverage on a scene.

We are here to discuss that with anyone who is interested.

In other words, he made a claim, then refused to discuss it with anyone who disagreed.

Do not discuss with anyone other than the police responding to the scene.

At the conclusion of an interview with a witness (and some interviews with suspects), the investigator will often inform the witness that they consider the interview to be confidential and that the witness should not discuss it with anyone other than their legal adviser.

During the first meeting with your potential lawyer, you will be discussing things that are very personal, some of which you might have not discussed with anyone else.

I am always happy to discuss with anyone if I can be of assistance to them.

The medical assistant, MA, job description entails performing administrative and clinical duties, including taking and recording of patients» personal information and medical history, which they must keep confidential and should never be discussed with anyone else except other medical practitioners involved in the patients» treatment.

Not exact matches

«We have a legally binding lease with AMC Theater on the space, so we are not at liberty to discuss lease specifics with anyone other than the leaseholder,» a spokesman for Lexin told Business Insider via email.

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions declined to say last week if anyone from the White House had discussed the merger with any Justice Department officials.

Flynn resigned as national security adviser on Monday night after just 24 days on the job, the shortest tenure anyone has ever served in the role, amid revelations that he discussed sanctions with the Russian ambassador during the presidential transition period, and may be susceptible to foreign blackmail.

We recently caught up with Khan, who discussed how his own education shaped his passion project, his belief that anyone can learn anything and what's next for Khan Academy, online and off.

During his opening statements Tuesday, attorney Becker Jr. told a judge hearing the case that Coppedge's supervisor threatened him with termination if he «pushed his religion» and ordered Coppedge to refrain from discussing politics or religion with anyone in the office.

Generally, they are asked by the patient or family member to visit, so that they may discuss personal issues that may be to painful to speak to with anyone else.

The obvious answer is that Buchanan has not asked Sullivan or anyone else to discuss in public his relationship with Mrs. Buchanan.

The show ended in good humour with Darren replying: «That is possibly the nicest thing anyone's ever said to me on this programme and I don't imagine I'll be able to take you up on it for the reasons we've discussed but I appreciate the sentiment.»

I am an avid reader of the sciences and philosophy as well so I believe that with my educational and life's background I can speak intelligently on these subjects but certainly not exhaustively and stand ready to discuss evidence (s) for and against with anyone willing to dialog without rancor or name calling or nastiness.

@ME II — Discussing odds is another subject for another day and as far as poker goes I'll play anyone any time or any amount my bankroll can afford I do play the odds there and not try to donk my way to a win with some one outer on the river!

Even with a BSC in physics I often feel inadequate discussing physics with anyone who has had more than two or three years of grad - level schooling on the subject.

I'm open to discussing that point, but didn't realize anyone (including you) disputed the idea that most religious people were raised with that particular religion.

Often it appears in symposia about the relative incapacity of anyone to say much of anything with security about God, since everything we can say is a perspectival construal conditioned decisively by the sociohistorical situation from which one comes — a view that, oddly, always seems to be coupled with a plea to discuss the matter a lot more.

Oh and Beth, I'm always open to discussing what it is I belief and why with anyone.

Why would anyone want to discuss evolution with Topher?

In addition, he should let it be known that he welcomes the opportunity to talk individually with anyone who wishes to discuss any issue raised by his sermons.

I definitely love to debate, discuss religious matters with just about anyone, always taking the devil's advocate's position.

If this were the way everyone did theology, I would be willing to discuss theology (referring back to the post I wrote a couple of years ago about why I will not «argue» theology with anyone).

He was reading, discussing and doing literary criticism with anyone who was interested — students and colleagues alike.

At the same time, throughout August, Luther was composing a formal and personal letter to the young Emperor and a public Offer and Protest — these were personal matters and both texts he discussed in detail with Spalatin in sharp distinction from his polemical works about which he seldom consulted anyone once he had settled the truth of the matter in his own mind, and the text began to flow like molten metal.

He wrote to prelates about the matter, and «I published my theses, inviting learned men and them alone to discuss them with me... By a miracle which astounded me more than anyone, these theses were spread through almost the entire world», even though, being academic theses, the text was dense and summary.

I've noticed that whenever I discuss making nut milk with anyone, the question of utilizing the leftover nut pulp is bound to come up.

I have tried many times to discuss in a mature way with Jon, but it seems that he has to belittle anyone who disagrees with him.

That's a cool 21 players whom I would at least discuss earnestly with anyone who was passionate about the subject.

And I mean DISCUSS, not a platfom to abuse anyone who doesn't agree with your personal opinion.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

One of the first things discussed was relationship contracts — yep, the contract in The New I Do that asks couples to talk, agree to and write down how they want to structure their relationship based on their goals and values, the same contract that Modern Love essayist and creative writing professor Mandy Len Catron used when moving in with her romantic partner, Mark, and that she highlights in her book, How to Fall in Love With Anywith her romantic partner, Mark, and that she highlights in her book, How to Fall in Love With AnyWith Anyone.

That was one of the topics discussed at a workshop in Vancouver, B.C., on love put on by Carrie Jenkins, a philosophy professor at the University of British Columbia, that featured many wonderful speakers besides Jenkins, whose thought - provoking book, What Love Is And What It Could Be, comes out in a few weeks, including Marina Adshade, UBC professor of economics, author of of Dollars and Sex: How Economics Influences Sex and entertaining TEDx speaker; and Mandy Len Catron, who teaches writing at UBC and whose Modern Love essay on how to make anyone fall in love with you was one of the most - read Modern Loves, and that lead her to write a book on love essays that comes out in 2017.

She makes this clear every time she is pressed to substantiate her claims; she can't do it, so she falls back on refusing to discuss anything with anyone who is «disrespectful» as if challenging her claims is a sign of disrespect.

And yet she failed to disclose it to anyone, but instead acted like she'd just stumbled across this story and, as a completely uninvolved stranger, wanted to discuss it with us?

These ideas should be discussed with your spouse, doula, doctor, midwife, and anyone else involved in the birth process.

Make sure that you discuss the importance of safe sleep practices with anyone taking care of your baby.

I mean of course I think it should be discussed with a significant other or boyfriend, but ultimately I don't think anyone should be pressuring a mom into breastfeeding.

We'll also discuss wear and care information, making sure all your questions are answered and you're fully prepared to share this information with anyone else who cares for your baby (mom, dad, grandparents, aunts and uncles, babysitters, daycare employees, etc.).

Having discussed the purpose and advantages of cribs designed for small spaces, you might be wondering why anyone ever opts for a regular, standard sized crib when there's an option of buying a smaller crib with almost all the crib features available at a lower price.

When we found out we were having two boys, I decided in that moment that I would not be discussing their genitals with anyone outside of our immediate family just as I never have and never will discuss my daughters» genitals in any kind of public or written forum.