Sentences with phrase «discuss observations you have»

If you are an S, you should discuss the observations you have made in the lab and ask the Ns involved what picture they see emerging.

After face painting is complete, allow time at the end to discuss observations you have made throughout the activity and for clients to process their thoughts and feelings from the experience.

Not exact matches

One observation that stands out, probably because it is rarely discussed, is how many founders have relationship struggles with their significant others and families.

I'm still working all this out in my head, but as a woman who has grown to accept her ambitious spirit rather than resist it (perhaps because of my upbringing, perhaps because of Dan's influence and support, perhaps because of that whole Enneagram Type 1 thing), I offer just a few observations that I hope we can discuss further in the comment section:

Two recurring items that were discussed on the Cats side of the ball were that Duke had run roughshod over the defense and that Jackson has had no success agaist Power 5 teams; none of the observations on the two topics took into account the defensive back injuries that depleted the defense for Duke or the fact that Jackson has been banged up.

This observation would suggest that these tactical changes must have been discussed and practiced before the match.

Another thing: radio is an inherently personal medium — because people have to imagine what's being discussed, radio tends to draw them in in a much more intimate way than television (an observation that gets repeated over and over when NPR has a pledge drive).

In a press conference Monday at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco, three researchers discussed how detailed satellite observations have facilitated ecological studies of change over time.

In fact, UTC combines atomic frequency - standard data with observations of the astronomical time - scale UT1, a combination that has both advantages and problems, as discussed in this paper.

She reports on her pioneering observations and discusses some of the surprising results this work has led to.

As has become a habit (2009, 2010, 2011), here is a brief overview and update of some of the most discussed model / observation comparisons, updated to include 2012.

In my clinical experience, I've made some observations and have discussed the topic of correlation of different ketone bodies at length with colleagues.

I've already discussed how many critics seem to be misinterpreting Mike Leigh's «Happy - Go - Lucky» and its protagonist, Poppy, by interpreting it as a sheer feelgood work — and in doing so, missing much of the film's complex, subtle social observation.

Matt's (Josh Hartnett) idea is to take sex off the table in observation of Lent (but mainly to get over an ex-girlfriend) and — surprise — ends up spending the entire forty days discussing why he isn't having sex, what else he can do besides having sex, and, generally, sex (in the same way he says he's over the girl but keeps bringing up how he's so over her).

The videos could have other benefits as well — allowing a principal to time - shift their observations to quieter times of the day or week, providing material to discuss with peers and colleagues, facilitating the use of external experts who may not be on the school site.

This lesson calls upon observation and analysis skills as students explore and then discuss the changes that have been made to the natural environment.

You had plans to visit a few classrooms, catch up on some paperwork, and meet with a couple of teachers to discuss upcoming classroom observations.

As children explore, they discuss their observations and enjoy recording what they have observed.

I have used this for an observation and presented it during a whole school meeting when discussing innovative lessons and Mantle of the Expert.

While Kraft and Gilmour assert that «systems that place greater weight on normative measures such as value - added scores rather than... [just]... observations have fewer teachers rated proficient» (p. 19; see also Steinberg & Kraft, forthcoming; a related article about how this has occurred in New Mexico here; and New Mexico's 2014 - 2016 data below and here, as also illustrative of the desired normal curve distributions discussed above), I highly doubt this purely reflects New Mexico's «commitment to putting students first.»

They have now been able to talk together about the observation process, discuss the best way to see how students are mastering the material, and have conversations about the rubric to come to a common district understanding of their evaluation plan.

However, this study has a wider focus, as it discusses four areas, namely student evaluation of the primary sources, the impact on cross-curricular activities, skill development, and observations of the authentic challenges.

What perhaps we don't hear through her observations are how these students have been supported by their schools to engage with, confront, and then productively discuss their personal experiences in an open, yet safe setting.

We are honored to feature Scott Nyary, the EL Coordinator, Lead ESL Teacher and Title III Coordinator for Lamar County School District located near Hattiesburg, Mississippi discussing his observations following the announcement that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program has been rescinded:

The study looked at whether instruction and student outcomes would be influenced by having teachers discuss evidence about their practice, derived from classroom observations, along with student learning data.

Have students record or discuss their observations and remove any damaged houses.

As will be discussed later, many states and districts use teacher evaluation systems, particularly teacher observation, to try to determine which instructional moves lead to increased student learning, but research has yet to definitively identify a consistent and robust catalogue of specific practices that constitute effective teaching.

It is generally a positive number with statistical significance (albeit its efficacy has waned in recent years, and we will discuss this observation in the next blog post).

By introducing the topic as your observation, you provide an opportunity for associates to discuss their level of confidence without having to raise this sensitive topic themselves.

He said the decision had been made during the evaluation meeting to discuss reports from the Volcanology and Geological Disaster Mitigation Center (PVMBG), the Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Agency (BMKG) and the Volcanic Ash Advisory Center (VAAC) in Darwin as well as pilots» observation and tests conducted at the airport.

Lowry: I think David's observation discusses one of the most interesting developments that has occurred, in the last decade, which is, with the advent of a handful of mega-galleries that have the financial resources and the physical space to produce major exhibitions, there is a real blurring of the line between what we do as museums and what those galleries are doing.

It is worth quoting from this idiosyncratic piece by Judith Benhamou - Huet about the ascendancy of Hauser + Wirth and Zwirner galleries because it somewhat echoes and confirms the observation made by others that in today's global art world, these two veteran galleries have begun to eclipse (if that's even the appropriate word) Gagosian in the art world's imagination as the most - discussed art enterprises.

The work of an award - winning astrologer (one Theodor Landscheidt, who also thought that the rise of Hitler and Stalin were due to cosmic cycles), a classic Courtillot paper we've discussed before, the aforementioned FoS web page, another web page run by Doug Hoyt, a paper by Garth Paltridge reporting on artifacts in the NCEP reanalysis of water vapour that are in contradiction to every other reanalysis, direct observations and satellite data, a complete reprint of another un-peer reviewed paper by William Gray, a nonsense paper by Miskolczi etc. etc..

As has been noted by others, this is comparing model temperatures after 2020 to an observation - based temperature in 2015, and of course the latter is lower — partly because it is based on HadCRUT4 data as discussed above, but equally so because of comparing different points in time.

It is very encouraging, educational, and enlightening for non-experts to have esteemed scientists like Drs. Curry, Kossin, and Trenberth discussing their observations and hypotheses about this important topic for all to see, rather than simply leaving it to a conference setting where scientists are the only ones present.

There's nothing inherently wrong with this, but none of these topics (in my view) require a critical, zeroth - order silver bullet to reconcile observations, models, and theory, at least beyond what has so far been extensively discussed in the literature (observational issues, natural variability, etc).

But quite a few papers have also been published discussing the distortions to the daily mean that are caused by changing the once - daily time of observation.

It relates both to Rockwell's observation of a high birth rate and a discussion I had with Amstrup, on the idea that tougher ice conditions from warming might drive polar bears to interbreed and hybridize with their terrestrial kin at a worrisome rate, as was discussed in another notable paper last week.

I have a dream that someday science will be judged on the evidence and not on its policy considerations; a dream that someday scientists can meet together and discuss climate openly and without fear of censure, loss of employment or lost opportunities for advancement; a dream that scientists will be judged on the basis of the quality of their observations and logic and not on their politics.

In January 2008, I discussed here and here how Hansen's projections compared against the most recent RSS and MSU data, noting a downtick which resulted in a spread not merely between observations and Scenario A, but between observations and Scenario B, sometimes said to have been vindicated.

Apart from the fundamental scientific advances of the breakthrough papers, there is an hierarchy of classes of lesser papers, along the lines of those which — • Confirm or deny the main thrust of a breakthrough paper by arriving from other angles • Provide an alternative or improvement to the main findings of breakthrough papers • Contribute more observation to the breakthrough paper and discuss its relevance • Seek to set a complementary base for a breakthrough in a related aspect of science • Report the views of a clutch of authors about a topic they deem to have political importance • Ditto for educational importance • Write papers that are knowingly lacking good science to place authors in one camp or another • Lambast an author or authors for being on the «wrong» side of a polarised topic • Perform meta analysis Etc..

My observation is that Judith's honesty and itegrity and willingness to openly discuss what the rest of the world already knows, in contrast to the omerta of the cadre of scientists made it inevitable she would be shunned by them.

Field observations summarized in the contribution by Hutchings and discussed in this month's Regional Outlook indicate that starting ice thicknesses were comparable to last year in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas, and that after getting off to a fast start, melt has slowed down considerably, resulting in below - normal melt rates.

Many climatologists, when faced with «the divergence problem» with tree - ring proxies hid behind the standard observation that «this has been discussed in the literature», as if the act of discussing it made the problem somehow go away.

In this post, I'd like to (i) describe the significance of using the financial industry as a lever point for environmental change, (ii) summarize the different ways in which the concept of «green finance» plays out with Chinese banks, (iii) discuss some of the more interesting observations by the Report, and (iv) conclude with the Report's recommendations.

As we have discussed, there is a skill required in comparing models to observations in ways that are most productive, and that requires a certain familiarity with the history of climate and weather models.

The issue that is being discussed here (if I have it right) is the observation that temperature and CO2 concentration time series observations seem to exhibit autocorrelation, that is what you get today is dependent to some extent on what happened in the past.

So if certain aspects have not been discussed, in the written observations or in the hearing, it is difficult for the Court then to raise new legal issues.

The cases that I have discussed or referred to above are but a small selection but I believe that my observations above and that I will make hereafter reflect a much broader knowledge and experience of the Court and the judgments that it has delivered.

In dissent, Justice Alito vehemently disagreed with that observation, asserting that the report was «highly relevant» and had been discussed by the respondent university both at the certiorari and the merits stage.